vivek
01 March 2012 at 17:21
sir I am very curious to know the following
I am a divorcee living in delhincr .and i have a 3 yrs long relationship with a foreigner woman who will be coming to India in march...we are planning to get married after a few days.She will not live with my family but i have arranged a house for her to live seperately till the marriage is over.In bwtween as nowadays police verification of the tenants are on rise .so if the police verification is done ..can in any way police harrass her or me in any way till we finally get msrried ? Is there any way out that we can live peacefully before we get married plss let us know whts the best way out thank u
pushpakrishna
01 March 2012 at 16:55
Dear Experts,A person is is having a general stores and purchesed Tea pockets from a manufacturer under sealed pockets having with a bill for selling purpose. Food inspecter visited the shop and purchesed tea pockets and booked a case stating the same adulterated and send the same for test.Food inspecter booked a case U/S16(i)a under Prevention of Food adulteration Act in the Court making the PERSON as A1 and the MANUFACTURER as A2.Later A2 died. Can the PERSON is liable for the offence?Kindly advice with CITATIONS.Thanq.
Vijay Tiwari
01 March 2012 at 12:00
Respected Sirs,
I am from Allahabad and my wife is from Delhi. Due to differences she left back to her parents home in Delhi. After that she filed 2 cases on me.
1. FIR in police station under 498a in 2009 only against me
2. Private complaint under 200 crpc for ipc 406 against all my family members (11) and me.
I was arrested from Allahabad and taken to Delhi first in the FIR case, i got bail after 5 days. and then all my family members got issued non bailable warrant in the 406 ipc 200 crpc case and we all had to run to Delhi and after much tension we all got bail.
My lawyers have difference in opinion and I want to know the correct thing.
1. In the FIR case they both filed for discharge for me in 239 crpc stating allegation of cruelty groundless as no medical is there and no witness from allahabad is there. But the Court rejected my discharge that allegations in the FIR prima facie disclose commision of offense and FIR is not an encyclopedia of all events.
2. Now the case is put up for framing of charge. My one lawyer says we will argue on charge that 498a is not at all attracted and get you discharged as 498a is not all made but the other lawyers says that you have already "exhausted the oppurtunity of argument" by arguing under 239 crpc and the court will not give you oppurtunity when framing charge in 240 crpc.
I dont know what is right please advice to me in this context.
3. My same lawyers in the 200 crpc ipc 406 case are fighting amongst themselves that "prima facie case is constituted by the documents, email sent by my father in law to me asking me to return back my wifes educational certificates and her sarees(no mention of jwellery)" while the other lawyer is arguing that there is some Supreme Court judgement that 202 crpc says that no issue to process can be done till the enquiry is not done as it is mandatory for people from outside states. Now I cant understand which of them is correct.
If some one can give the correct legal position, please I am highly obliged, there will be many people who might be trapped by wrong suggestions by their counsels.
LAXMINARAYAN - Sr Advocate.
01 March 2012 at 11:07
Whether complainant can be recalled for further cross in NI 138 cases u/s 311 of CRPC. There are conflicting judgments of various HC so any conclusive citation of supreme court.
rayu mahambare
01 March 2012 at 10:44
Sir,
u/s 138 of N I Act accused was convicted by d trial court. The accused has admitted his liability in the reply to my statutory notice. In appeal, Appellate Court passed an order and remanded d matter to lower court. Despite there is no such prayer from d Appellant, no pleading of adducing further evidence from either party. The court
has taken 3 months time to pass such order after both sides concluded their arguments. I
think something fishy. Please guide me -
1. What will be the next remedy for me?
2. Any other suggestion?
3. Any scope of lodging a complaint against
d judge?
Ravichandra
01 March 2012 at 10:28
Hi Sir,
could you please let me know what is the procedure to get the final judgement copy xerox from the court.
1) Please let me know the procedure , whom should we approach etc
2) how much will it cost officially
3) if we dont collect the copy now, will it be lost from court after some time ?
i dont want to spend any money to get the judgement copy xerox papers. I want to get it on own. please help me.
taylor
29 February 2012 at 22:29
if interim bail order r made then it is said notice shall b given to pub pros to hear him when application shall b finally heard by the COURT.presence of accused shall also b necessary before such COURT.
pls tell me to which court refrence is made above whether HC,COURT OF SESSION or MAGISTRATE taking cognizance.
thanks
Neeraj Thakur
29 February 2012 at 22:24
The Accused was Charged u/s 22 & 61 of NDPS Act 1985. The recovery from accused is only 23 injections of drugs. He is already in custody since last 4 months & First bail application was rejected by Add. Session Judge. How he could get bail...
Sandeep Naik
29 February 2012 at 20:14
The complaint is pending in JMFC and serious allegations are made against the accused. These allegations are not reflected in the complaint filed in the Police Station. The accused has filed defamation u/s section 500 of IPC against the complainants on those statements. Neither the JMFC nor the Session Court or Even HC under Writ accepted it. The HC stated that there is no such provision to challenge such statements. Till the case is finally decided by the JMFC nothing can be done. My query is the case may take further ten years. Does that mean the accused should stick stigma on his character till the case is decided ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Matter dismmissed
please advise me that i field a complaint under sec156(3) crpc. after inquiry magistrate had dismissed the matter without issuing a process. so what can i do next? appeal or revision please help me