V.N.K. MENON
14 October 2019 at 09:07
Dear experts,
Since I have no experience in trial court, I submit herewith a draft of List of Witnesses which may please be examined and valued opinion be given for which I would be much grateful.
In one format of High Court Rules, I have seen the List of Witnesses in fabular form.
(DRAFT)
1. The Complainant CW-1 (address on record)
Facts Sought to be proved by the evidence of the witness:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intentional insult [S-504 IPC] by Accused No. 1 by returning consignment after pilferage and cello-taped by
her which at the time of delivery to her weighed 300 gms evidenced by speedpost receipt and after pilferage
by Accused-1 weighed 68 grams [exhibit CW-1/A]; and whereas Accused No. 2 (Postman) for extraneous
considerations after delivery took back the pilfered consignment after 6 days and in conspiracy with Accused-
1 sent it back after another 10 days marking it as “refused”.
Documents sought to be proved by the evidence of the witness:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reliance on attested copy of Delivery Slip: [1] Ex CW-1/A & [2] pilfered consignment weighing 68 gms
marked as Ex CW-1/B submitted vide statement dated: 14/08/2019.
2. Mr. ______ Senior Supdt. of PO/CPIO
Naraina I.E. Head Post Office
New Delhi-110028
Facts Sought to be proved by the evidence of the witness:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The witness has provided attested copy of Delivery Slip, which is in response to RTI application sent to
Accused No. 3 [Post Master] who “intentionally” aided the commission of the crime by Accused No. 2 in
fabricating false evidence for extraneous
considerations. It is judicially noticeable that the signature of actual recipient was camouflaged by stapling a
piece of paper with a forged signature over it and then photocopied and attested [CW-1A].
Documents sought to be proved by the evidence of the witness:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Witness to give oral evidence & to produce original Delivery Slip fabricated (S-192 IPC) by Accused-2
Postman & Accused-3 wilful abettor of crime (S-107 IPC).
3. Mr. -------
(address)
Father of Accused-1
who took delivery of consignment
Facts Sought to be proved by the evidence of the witness:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Witness had initialed* the Delivery Slip (CW-1/A) and handed over the consignment to Accused-1
(addressee) on 13.07.2016 who resorted to intentional insult in collusion with Accused-2 pilfered the consignment
and Accused No.2 took it back after 6 days and sent it back after another 10 days as evident from CW-1/B.
[* admitted/authentic specimen of initial is available].
Documents sought to be proved by the evidence of the witness:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It proves that the consignment was delivered to Accused-1 at her residence.
4. I/O F.I.R. No. ----------
P.S: C.R. Park
New Delhi
5. Any other relevant witnesses as per the outcome.
Witnesses required to give oral evidence and also to produce documents
Filed by COMPLAINANT IN PERSON
Filed on.....................
Santhosh kumar
13 October 2019 at 14:05
Kindly let me know as soon as Possible that What are the grounds to be taken in the counter of 205 Crpc Petition.
Santhosh kumar
13 October 2019 at 14:01
Kindly let me know as soon as Possible that What are the grounds to be taken in the counter of 311 Crpc Petition.
Santhosh kumar
13 October 2019 at 13:31
Bailable warrant has been misplaced by the Police Department. what is the procedure to obtain fresh Bailable Warrant in the court
JAYARAJ, NOTARY PUBLIC
10 October 2019 at 17:38
Sirs,In a Domestic violence case the husband was working in a multinational company in Bangalore but now he has gone to America and is working there. The magistrate Court has order that the husband should pay the compensation and maintenance to the wife and the child. Since the husband is in America, the wife could not execute the court order . What is the remedy to execute the court order.
Thirumalai Dasan K
09 October 2019 at 15:20
Sir/Madam, I am working in a private ltd co. in Chennai and is authorised signatory for business activities except for signing cheques. A cheque for INR 12,00,000 / - signed by MD issued to a supplier in Gujarat. Before the cheque date, we paid around 6,50,000/- through NEFT. Despite this the supplier deposited the cheque and filed a case u/s 138 at Magistrate Court in Ahmadabad against me and my former purchase colleague. Kindly explain pros and cons and advise on this. Thanks in advance
Anonymous
08 October 2019 at 21:06
In a contempt order madras high court ordered two contractors n an officer to pay 40000 to a charitable trusts. In the counter affidavit also contractors submitted fake non judicial stamp papers as docs. Treasury officer says that the stamp paper are not issued to the stamp vendor. So it is fake. Now what type of case should I file in the same HC? Contempt r fresh WP etc. Kindly let me know sir
mohamed haseeb ahmed
07 October 2019 at 19:51
DEAR MEMBERS
IS AN ORDER OF NBW IS INTERLOCUTERY ORDER.HOW
IS REVISION MAINTANABLE AGAINST CANCELLATION OF NBW IN THE ABSENCE OF ACCUSED?
PLZ REPLY WITH RELEVANT CITATIONS
Anonymous
06 October 2019 at 19:18
A contract company has two partners. One is authorized to sign in contract agreement. He wants to give corruption complaint in an officer in VAC. Should the company pass resolution and give him permission?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Crpc
How the accused is prejudiced if a warrant case is tried as a summon case.. Can you illustrate this using an example