Pushkar Damle
09 July 2009 at 11:17
Hi, This is Pushkar Damle,
Can anyone help me in finding the documentary proof related to "Medical test is mandatory for a person who is being appointed as Public Servant".
you can mail it to pushkar_damle@rediffmail.com
B.B.R.Goud.
08 July 2009 at 17:32
study of Enginineering, Medicine, Law, Management, Sciences etc professional courses, can any one claim the protection under Art 21, Constitution of India ?
Diana
08 July 2009 at 13:16
can summoning of documents be treated as vioative of article 20(3) of the constitution. On what grounds it can be violative.
Shree.
07 July 2009 at 18:35
Whether order passed in violation of principles of natural justice is void ab-initio?
Raghav Singh
07 July 2009 at 17:27
This is very interesting case that is currently being argued before the DB comprising of the CJ of MP high court.(w.p.no.4778/2009)
The dipute is regarding the reservation of one orthodonitics seat in MGM medical college indore. There are in total 5 seats, out of which 2 are reserved for the candidates selected through national admission test, and 3 are reserved for the state.
Now out of 3 seats, 2 are reserved for the Sc/St and the OBC's and there is only 1 seat left which is being reserved for the female candidate(4th rank merit list) at the cost of the student who scored maximum marks in the entrance test.
The college authorities are of the view that they are following the rotation policy whereby the seat would again be an open seat for the next two years. it is important to recognise the interest of the women as per article 15(3) of the constitution.
but what about article 15(4) which specifically lays down that merit should be given preference. and further would it not amount to 100% reservation?
Vijay Kumar
07 July 2009 at 09:19
My question is--
Who of the following cannot be removed by the parliament?
(a) Attorney General
(b) Auditor General
(c) Election Commissioner
(d) Chief Justice of India
Resp. expert members if possible pls give explanation also.
[The question was asked in UPHJS(Pre)2009 Exam, my brother was a candidate and I want to know the correct answer of this question.]
Thanks in advance.
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
30 June 2009 at 23:02
my friend servicing as 4th grade cader in the navy as civilian in dockyard as per his statements he has not got promototion while the other person who joined later than my friend all promototed and got promotion now he wants to proceeds in the highcourt for the promotion on the said matter under the article 226 is that really propery remedy
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
30 June 2009 at 22:59
my friend servicing as 4th grade cader in the navy as civilian in dockyard as per his statements he has not got promototion while the other person who joined later than my friend all promototed and got promotion now he wants to proceeds in the highcourt for the promotion on the said matter under the article 226 is that really propery remedy
siddhartha pydipati
28 June 2009 at 10:40
ramya is a govt. employee.an attempt on her life was made by ravi for rejecting his love proposal.ramya succumbed to injuries.now,the government issues an order
inducting krishna,ramya's brother,into govt. service on compassionate grounds.what is the legal position? is it constitutionally valid?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
WHAT IS THE MEANING OF 12 MONTHS FROM THE PRECEDING MEETING
I SHALL BE OBLIGED IF THE LEGAL LUMINARIES MAKE IT CLEAR THAT IF IS WRITTEN AS "MEETING HAS TO BE HELD WITHIN 12 MONTHS FROM THE LAST PRECIDING MEETING (MEETING WAS HELD ON 13.07.2008)". DOES IT MEAN 12 CALENDAR MONTHS i.e. NEXT AUGUST 2009 OR 365 DAYS FROM 13.07.2009 i.e. WITHIN 12.07.2009.
REQUEST FOR DETAIL LOGICAL CLARIFICATIOS.
Sriprakash Bhattacharya
bhattacharyasriprakash@gmail.com