Rajneesh Madhok
02 September 2009 at 18:08
RTI APPLICATION REPLIED BY PUTTING BACK DATE BY PIO ON FILING APPEAL TO FAA
I filed an RTI application on 13th July 2009, which had been delivered to the CPIO on 15.07.09. Any how we add five days in the date of delivery that will come out to be 18th July 2009. On getting no reply from the PIO, the First Appeal had been made to FAA on 19.08.09.
On 31.08.09 I received the reply by an official of the concerned department not mentioning his designation. He signed the reply as For Sr. Divl. Comml Manager, *****Name of Town. The concerned official is not PIO or FAA according to the website.
The PIO played the game by sending reply dated 18.08.09 which I received on 31.08.09. The reply made by ordinary pos. No seal on the envelope has been put by postal department. Neither at the place the envelope had been posted nor the place of delivery of document. The Postal stamps affixed at the back of the envelope has no seal.
Now the question is that.
1. Whether my First appeal that has been made on 19th Aug will be considered or not. Though I have documentary evidence of posting.
2. Whether I will have to file second appeal once again as I am not satisfied with the reply sent by the concerned official.
3. Should I make complaint to CIC.
4. How can I prove that the information that I received actually on 31st Aug 2009.
5. The PIO has sent reply on OIGS envelope. Whether we should make the enquiry of posting of that letter with evidence.
6. Our postal department is also funny. It does not put stamp.
7. Now the point is the proof of delivery.
8. What will be the intention of the CPIO to send reply after due date and putting back date on the replied letter.
Rajneesh Madhok,
B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar,
St. No. 2, Railway Road,
Phagwara
Sumir
02 September 2009 at 14:24
Can a PIL be taken back after filing in a court? I have some information obtained through net that it can't be taken back?
debasis MANDAL
30 August 2009 at 00:04
I want to know under which law a gazetted officer or any group-A officer can attested a document i.e. mark sheet and certificate of examination etc.?
monika
29 August 2009 at 18:17
please guide that if a person takes retirement from his services under VRS scheme , and his application has been accepted also ,is there any stipulated time period within which department is supposed to clear his dues if it is more than one and a half year what remedy does he have and how should he move about it,if there is any citation or case law related to this plz guide
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
28 August 2009 at 08:48
Experts,
is there any case law upon 29 cr.p.c.?
what about 29 ,357 cr.p.c.
Arun Purohit
27 August 2009 at 17:10
please let me know as soon as possible the facts & judgement of case "Krishna Sagar Mills V/s Union Of India, AIR 1959 SC 316"which is the clarification for the "Explaining the "Reasonableness for the Restriction to the Fundamental right to Freedom as per Article19(2)nto 19(6)
.
lalit rishi
26 August 2009 at 16:24
An Industrial Tribunal was established under the industrial tribunals Act. it provided powers only to create it. but the same authority also abolished it.
my contention was that the tribunal is discharging a constitutional function, hence it cant be abolished by the authority who has not been expressly provided with
the powers. in other words the act does not provide powers to abolish it. hence i say it has been wrngly abolished without there being powers to abolish it. Am I right. are there any
judgements to support this contention that power to abolish tribunal is not deemed , it has to be specifically provided. kindly help me.
Adinath@Avinash Patil
26 August 2009 at 08:54
Is Hon;ble justce Shailedra Kumar's statement regaing disclosing assets is correcct.
madhav
25 August 2009 at 17:07
Please refer the latest court judgement for further discussion.(If ailment's curable, you can't be denied job: HC) http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Mumbai/If-ailments-curable-you-cant-be-denied-job-HC/articleshow/4501144.cms
Here, HC clearly has ruled out the case in favor of the candidate.
Dear Members - Does this mean SBI is going to follow this judgement in amending their rules for future recruits.
If you say 'YES', then why they are so rude in disqualifying my friend saying he is 'medically ineligible' for the job. He's been selected for a clerk post in SBI this January'09, however he didn’t join because of his heart ailment (that is absolutely curable & mostly irrelevant to the job ) along with other selected candidates.
And SBI just doesn’t care to communicate this to him - that he is rejected 'IN WRITING'. He waited almost for 8 months to get some news from SBI in light of the above court judgement.
Do you think he need to file a case in court, as the case is similar to ranjit rajak's case in above judgement. If yes, which HC he needs to file a case (whether in Mumbai-SBI's corporate place or his local station i.e., Hyderabad).
Please advice & suggest. Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
about statement of peoples from ministry
Meanwhile mr.Jaswant and Yashwant made a statement about dicision .Is it not the breach of trust or contract or contrary to sworn in while to be minister.I am willing to file PIL at Aurangabad Highcourt,maharashtra.Weather petition will be maintainable?