Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 14:04
Ld Counsels,
A writ petition was allowed by High Court. Then the respondent filed a Writ appeal under clause 15 of Letters Patent.
High court dismissed the appeal at admission level itself and a reivew of this dismissal was not accepted.
What is next step available for the respondet in Writ Petition.
Should the SLP before Supreme Court need to be against the order of Writ Appeal or againt the order of Writ Petition.
Please clarify. Thanks
shantanu dekhane
12 November 2010 at 09:36
What is the Concept of the Secularism with Reference to Indian Socio Legal Context?
Anonymous
12 November 2010 at 08:29
The Hon Supreme Court had held in Union of India vs R Gandhi, president Madras bar association on 11-5-2010 that all tribunals should be transferred to ministry of law & justice to separate Judiciary from Executive. As held, functioning of DRT under Ministry of Fianance is unconstitutional. this message i am posting since some members wanted the citation.
Anonymous
11 November 2010 at 15:20
While interpreting the Constitution, if there is any doubt or conflict between various parts of Constitution, is there any order of precedence between various parts of the Constitution? If we say there is no order of precedence, then why is the need to mention the exceptions under Part III? Example: Article 13(4) says "Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under article 368." In other words if there was no order of precedence, then the sentence of Article 13(4) could have been very conveniently mentioned in article 368 itself.
Anonymous
10 November 2010 at 20:08
Despite Hon Supreme Court jdgmt that all Tribunals should be transferred to Ministry of Law & Justice, DRT is still functioning under Ministry of Finance. Is it not Contempt? If yes then who can file contempt case against Ministry of Finanace.
Anonymous
09 November 2010 at 00:42
Article 21 has the phrase "personal" liberty and not "individual" liberty. What would have been the difference in the meaning for the purpose of interpretation, if it had been "individual" liberty instead of "personal" liberty?
Anonymous
08 November 2010 at 19:00
Sir,
Please tell me, under which ruling compensation case can be filed against
below described university infinite delay in its working like declaration of results, examination schedule etc?
From where I can collect Act No. 1248(2)XVII-V-I-I-19-2000 ?
"Uttar Pradesh Technical University was established by the Government of Uttar Pradesh on 8th May 2000 vide Act No. 1248(2)XVII-V-I-I-19-2000 Uttar Pradesh Adhiniyam Sankhya 23 of 2000. Under the University Act, 'Technical Education' includes programmes of education, research and training in Engineering, Technology, Architecture, Town Planning, Pharmacy, Applied Arts & Crafts and such other programmes and areas that the central Government may in consultation with All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) by notification in Gazette declare."
Regards.
sk
Mr Sreejit
08 November 2010 at 02:47
PLS HLP WHAT CAN I DO IF 4 SPIOs OF WB FAILED AND THE STATE DONOT HAVE A INFO. COMMISSIONER TO HANDLE COMPLAINTS WHICH WERE LODGED ON JUNE 2010. IF COMSNR RETIRED OR NON APPOINTED SHD A CITIZEN SUFFER INJUSTICE.
CAN I MOVE SC OF INDIA OR RAISE SOS IN INTERNATIONAL FORUM..?
SRIDHAR
09047028232
Anonymous
07 November 2010 at 23:49
Ref: my post on 7/11 regarding notification
to police station about security agency
for residential flat's car parking.
Thanks all the respected lawyers for your's
valuable advices.now related to that another
two queries.pl.suggest.
1)one man committee for looking after security of the said car parking to be registered or not? if registered then which
way?
2)for monthly contribution by the residents
money receipts to be given or not?
Regards.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Non-speaking order
Ld counsels,
High Court passed a non-speaking order dismissing the writ appeal at admission.
Does this non-speaking order a valid ground for review.
Or will an appeal filed on this ground before the SC will once again be sent back for review to HC.
Please clarify.