Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 18:40
Does PIO card holder has Right to Information under RTI Act, so that he can apply to know the status of some long pending files concerning his own application like driving license application etc.?
As per my understanding he can since he is seeking information that is concerned to his files only.
Reason why I consider him eligible under RTI Act for his own application is that Freedom of Speech and Expression is also covered under Article 21 and law for enabling Article 19(1)(a) cannot be in contravention to Article 21.
Please correct me if I am wrong and give your views.
If he cannot use RTI act, inorder to know the status of his application, can he get the same application done by Indian citizen?
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 10:42
X (Female) is appointed as teacher in Govt School on contract basis in Backward Class(BC) Certificate on Aug 2009. X was married with Y (Male) in Oct 2008. Y is Scheduled Caste(SC). X name was registered in Y Ration Card on May 2009. X prepare their BC certificate on Jul 2009 with his father old Ration card photostat in which the name of the X is lies. But actually in May 2009 X father struck out his name.
Y prepare the SC Certificate of X in Dec 2009 with his ration card in which name f the X is add in May 2009.
Now X has 2 certificates, one is BC on which X is appointed and second in SC.
Is the BC certificate of X is valid or not.
or
Is the SC certificate of X is valid or not.
Anonymous
13 April 2011 at 20:41
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE IN SC says that No Advocate-on-Record may, without leave of the Court, withdraw from the conduct of any case by reason only of non-payment of fees by his client. But it is also applicable in any cases in the court which is sub – ordinate court to the SC. & also to any tribunal. That the advocate cannot withdraw from the conduct of any case by reason only of non-payment of fees by his client. If a advocate is practising in the SC than he/she can’t practise in any other court sub – ordinate to the SC ?
No person having an Advocate-on-Record shall be heard in person in SC except by Special Leave of the Court. So it means that if we file a SLP & the advocate is not advocate on record as per the SC practise & procedure guide than also can he/she can plead in SLP & any Writ Petition ?
thank.
Anonymous
12 April 2011 at 23:46
my aunt migrated to pakistan in 1948,during partition of the country,she never came back to india to resettel here .does she have any right to her parents property in india.
Anonymous
12 April 2011 at 17:57
1) Enrolled in district bar. Than only u can file writ in HC&SC so can a advocate be enrolled both in state bar council & also in district bar council ? if yes can u have the section as per the advocate act, 1961. Also what does the distric bar stands for as I know state bar council but what about district bar ?
2) Any case (other than those being filed by person in person) before the SC can be filed only through the AOR (advocate on record) . so what is the actual meaning of (other than those being filed by person in person) & In SLP, PIL are compulsory should be filled by AOR or any other advocate can do ? also what does the line means that (In fact the cases will be listed only in the name of the AOR) & the court sub – ordinate to SC the cases will be listed in the name of what ?
thanks.
Anonymous
12 April 2011 at 12:51
I want to have a passport for myself but the problem is that I am having a live in relationship with a women since 20 yrs now we hv two kids also .everyone knows that we are husband wife only we know we are not legally married...now I want to ask what do i have to write in the passport form ?SINGLE or what?wht do i hv to write i am so confused?what if the police of LIU come and ask who is she coz ?what do i have to tell becoz my neighbours dont know abt us?so how to convince them?plss help
Madhukar Bhatt
12 April 2011 at 00:00
Tobacco Gutkha plastic packing to ban whether this matter is pending for judgment in SC -is it true? If yes, then what is the final date of judgment? Not only gutkha plastic packing but gutkha itself product should be totally banned all over India for the sake of good health of teenagers & general public.Everybody knows but why it is not banned? Do not understand. NGO and social service organization should take up this matter seriously legally for this good and holy cause to save next generations from serious health problems like cancer and health disorder due to gutkha. Inspite strong opposition & resistance from rich gutkha lobby , I believe and have faith that some organization will take up matter to banned gutkha.
Anonymous
11 April 2011 at 19:49
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1528 OF 2005
Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan ... Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala ... Respondent
with
Criminal Appeal No.1530 of 2005
Manikantan @ Kochani ...Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala & Anr. ...Respondents
With
Criminal Appeal No.1531 of 2005
Manoharan ...Appellant
Versus
Kerala State Rep. Public Prosecutor ...Respondent
With
Criminal Appeal No. 1532 of 2005
Vinod Kumar @ Vinod ...Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala ....Respondent
With
Criminal Appeal No. 864 of 2011
[Arising out of SLP (Crl.) 842 of 2006)
Suresh Kumar @ Suresh ...Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala ...Respondent
Question :
1)as we know that there are so many appellant cant we write the name as
Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan ,Manikantan @ Kochani ,Manoharan , Vinod Kumar @ Vinod ,Suresh Kumar @ Suresh ...... Appellant &
State of Kerala & Anr. ...... respondent .
2) also what is the meaning of 9Kerala State Rep. Public Prosecutor ) not understood readed & seen this type words first time under the judgment.
3) as it is a criminal appeal why it has mentioned applicnt & respondent ? because it comes under the civil & not under the criminal cases & this is though appeal before the SC so why it has been written not understood ?
4)as we read the brief para on starting of the judgment known as a (Brief)
Brief
All the accused-appellants stood convicted by the Sessions Judge, Kollam by its judgment dated 16.7.2002 for various offences punishable
so that all th accused-appellant stood convicted by the SJ dated 16.7.2002 so why this many number & also on different year
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1528 OF 2005
Criminal Appeal No.1530 of 2005
Criminal Appeal No.1531 of 2005
Criminal Appeal No. 1532 of 2005
Criminal Appeal No. 864 of 2011
[Arising out of SLP (Crl.) 842 of 2006)
because if we see that they have made an appeal to the SC undestood that there should any one appela no of that year so why this many number as all the accused are convicted at the same time in the same case ? can we say as per [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) 842 of 2006)the appeal & SLP are mergered ?
so solve this huge problem which i am confused.
also what does the symbol @ means in this judgment context.
it is not a student query. as many expert says it is a student query.
Thanks
Anonymous
11 April 2011 at 12:01
Hi learned member
How can i file RTI to get copy of FIR , I am based out of delhi and FIR is filed in Kerala. Do I need to send it police station or somewhere else.
Please gudie me in procedure for filing RTI it is an emergency
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
amendment of preamble
can preamble, the object of the Constitution be amended???