Yogesh
26 April 2014 at 23:34
Dear Sir,
I have filed a PIL in SC, and now same PIL listed before the Court on Friday, the 9th day of May, 2014
I have received following email from SC.
From this email I understand only, that I have to go SC on 9 may.
But I don't understand, what SC will do on 9 may. & what I have to do on same date.
Please guide me in details, I am fighting for rights of all Indian innovator & researchers, and willing that some one stand with me at least at guideline level for this great work.
I look forward to receive your reply soon please.
Regards,
Yogesh Sonar
SECTION PIL (WRIT)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 295 OF 2014
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) WITH INTERLCOUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1
(Application for permission to appear and argue-in-person)
Yogesh Parmanand Sonar ... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Anr. ... Respondents
TAKE NOTICE THAT the Writ Petition alongwith Interlocutory Application above-mentioned will be listed before the Court on Friday, the 9th day of May, 2014 and will be taken up by the Court on the said day in the forenoon or so soon thereafter as may be convenient to the Court when you are required to appear before this Court on the said date and take such part in the proceedings as may be advised.
Dated this the 9th day of April, 2014.
Assistant Registrar
Member (Account Deleted)
25 April 2014 at 18:10
I have a case & I have posted it in details about it in my query as well. It was about admission of my daughter into MBBS aginst her EAMCET 2013 rank under CAP quota. The case was filed on 16 Jul, regd on 18 Jul and admitted on 8 Aug 2013. EAMCET counselling for special quota ( under CAP quota) held on 11 Sep and then finalised supposedly by 30 Sep 2013. But the honouble Judges despite oral, written submission by my advocate did not take up the case with no reason / explanation cited. I have taken NOC from my Adv and to defend my writ as PIP.I have submitted my request for an urgent hearing to even the CJ of AP High Court has no effect. But court has to hear it as I am not going to quit come what may. I know for sure that hon-ble Judge has no option but to
" to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and: (a) by declaring the action of the respondent No.3in refusing the CAP Certificate to the petitioner No.1, as illegal and unconstitutional (b) to direct the respondent No.1 to 3 to forthwith issue the CAP Certificate to the petitioner No. 1 enabling him to seek the admission of the petitioner No. 2in MBBS Seat in CAP Quota for 2013-2014"
And the University of Health & Science will object as it is delayed by a year etc etc.
What option(s) is/are available to me if the order is not effected with retrospect? What option is available to me to ensure the ZSWO , the Director Sainik Welfare, the GP Home , the Home department officials as well as the Registrar of the High court are brought to book for intentional delay?
Member (Account Deleted)
24 April 2014 at 18:56
My complaint online to Banking Ombudsman was admitted as a maintainable complaint by the office of the BO Hyd. After two months it disposed of under Clause 8 & 9(3) of the BO Rules 2006 without citing any specific sub rule/clause.And it was communicated only to the accused bank with no intimation to the complainant. The bank has informed me with an extract but without a copy of the order of BO. I read the clause and the subclauses on my own. After exhausting all my avenues for redressal of grievances submitted another complaint with all the relevant documents to BO Hyd by regd post on 14 Mar 2014. After two weeks i have recd a mail online from the personal assistant of BO Hyd informing me that my complaint ( the previous one which was admitted and then disposed off under clause 8 &9(3) of BO Rules 2006 has now been disposed under clause 11. No specific subclause or explanation given except debarring me from making an appeal to Dy Gov under clause 14. Your expert advice please.
Dr G V Rao
24 April 2014 at 11:20
Pls read it as Job instead of jpb..........Sirs, my sincere doubt......in most Government Scientific Depts, the post of Director is only one......however when the post of Director gets vacant, an advertisement is issued and applications sought for. Never are such posts carry provision for reservation for SC/ST and others....Such vacancy is always in the open category and no reservations are met with..Is this legal and allowed. What does Law say about such single posts......
Shumaila Altaf
21 April 2014 at 12:58
Greetings!
There is an error apparent on the record of the order passed in my habeas corpus petition. Can this order be reviewed since it's a criminal matter?
Pradeep
19 April 2014 at 21:52
Whether children of judicial officers in the subordinate judiciary come under creamy layer category?
Anonymous
19 April 2014 at 21:21
I am working with one of the publuc sevtor banks. I am given the responsibility to work as a loans officer. However I have been posted to place where there is much sc and st population. I myself am an sc but of a state other than the one I am working at. The major problem I am facing at my work place is with the sc and st leaders. If a loan is not sanctined to a sc or st csndidate then theur leaders come up and try to threaten us by saying a few words that we are expecting a bribe so thats the reason that we are not sanctioning a loan. When they say that, out of anger if we say something to them then they try to create a fuss at the bank along with other people. In this scenario my doubt is whether a sc or an st can file an atrocity case against another sc or st. There is also a fear that they might create a propaganda that the concerned official is corrupted. I can not even overcome this as I will not have any proof against them. Can any one help me by telling how this can be tackled.
ajay kumar mishra
19 April 2014 at 13:00
A person retired from the post of clerk from the office of west Bengal government but after two years his retirement benefits including pension( save and except P.F.) has not be given in spite of repeated letter. where he has to move either high court Calcutta or West Bengal Administrative Tribunal?
Vijay Kumar
15 April 2014 at 18:10
HI All,
Does private engineering colleges fall under RTI Act or not ?
I have found lot of malpractices being followed by these private engineering colleges.
I can see only AICTE mandated information like Employee list posted by these colleges.
Thanks in Advance
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Remark against muslim
Any tweet on caste of people without pointing at any individual is a legitimate or not?