LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

B.B.R.Goud.   16 years ago

right to live with dignity

as our India is rated as top one ( Rs 15372 Billion Crores as per the media reports ) in black list: highest black money accounts in swiss bank; can we file a case in supreme court or International Court of justice, praying the right to live with dignity under Art 21, by transfering the total black money in to our govt of India account.
Is it possible/practicable? If so how?

Dr.Mumbiram   16 years ago

Choice of Division Bench for Writ Petition in Bombay High Court

After getting our register number for writ petition (criminal) under Art.226 against Maharashtra Gov. and others at Bombay High Court,do we automatically get assigned to a specific court ?
Our online case status says division bench.
At this pre-admission level do we have a choice about which division bench (which Judges) ?
We wish to make circulation for early first hearing and immediately request interim relief.

B.B.R.Goud.   16 years ago

right to liberty

dear sir/madam,
In an Examination hall, flying squad came and took up malpractice check-up, during which the students, of age 16-22 years age, are asked to remove their dresses, in search of chits.In this case, any chits found, they are debarred successive exams and their entire previous exams are cancelled. in this aspect i would like to know and it is necessitated to take an advise:

1. Can a student be punished retrospcetively under malpractice?
2. Can a student be checked, by removing their clothes or touching their personal belongings, under malpractice check ?
3. Is it not the violation of Art 20(1) and 21?
4. Is it not the abuse of the children?

thanks, in advance, for one and all.

sudha   16 years ago

What to know the difference..?

Hi,
Anybody explain me in clear about the difference between Attorney General and Solicitor General under our Indian Constitution? i think advocate general in state is similar to attorney general in central? is it correct

regards
sudha

siva   16 years ago

Kindly guide me

Sir,

Iam Siva from A.P.

I want to file PIL Appeal at Hon.Supreme Court of India. The issue was related to our Constitution.(Kindly excuse me for not giving details).

But, I don't know how to approach. Kindly suggest me the way I have to proceed and also provide me references of expert lawyers in Constitutional Law.

And also I want to know about approximate cost I have to incur. Kindly Guide me.

Thank You.

Rajaram C Iyer   16 years ago

Right to information Act

Dear Shri. M. P. Perumal,Mr Palnitkar and Mr. Arora.

My question is still unanswered and I don't agree with you. some of the States having its own RTI Act are as follows
1. The Tamil Nadu Right to Information Act, 1997
2. The Delhi Right to Inforamtion Act, 2001
3. The Rajasthan RTI Act, 2000
4. The Orissa Right to Information Act, 2002
5. The Karnataka RTI ACt, 2000
6. Goa RTI ACt, 1997
7. The Assam RTI Act, 2000 Etc

My question whether information pertaining to a particular state government office can be sought invoking the Central Act or do I have to invoke the respective State Act. Please clarify?.

Rajaram C Iyer   16 years ago

Right to infomation Act, 2005

DEar Ld. Members,

Please clarify my dout. Every State Government has its own State Information Commission and Act. My question is can we seek information from State Government invoking the Central Act i.e The Right to Information Act?

Rajneesh Goyal   16 years ago

arbitrariness under article 14?

sir kindly reply!!!

vinod satpute   16 years ago

JURISDICTION

If any special tribunal established by the parliament,has the right to bar the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, OR

when can Supreme Court bar its own jurisdiction..

For instance , the trial of the terrorists under a Special Tribunal.

i need your expert advice please do help me...

Thank you and regards

Dr.Mumbiram   16 years ago

Application for Writ of Mandamus

The Art.226 (A) of the Constitution states that an order issued by the High Court in the nature of Mandamus will stand vacated if respondents were not furnished copies of the application for the writ or were not given an opportunity for hearing. Does the High Court provide copies of our application for writ to the respondents or is it left to us (the petitioner) to provide such copies of the application for writ to the respondents on our own ?
The Bombay High Court asks the petitioner to provide five copies of the writ petition. Are these extra-copies meant for the respondents ?