PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
01 June 2009 at 23:29
hello all learned expert
i wnat the full details in the descending order from the top to bottom designation of the all members of the rajysabha and loksabha with the power and duty pls inform
Kamal Grover
01 June 2009 at 15:34
We are Advocates in Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh. We require associate lawyers from all over India with a motive to refer cases each other. Plz send your concent for association. We are group of advocates expertise in various fields of law in Chandigarh and surrouning area of Mohali, Shimla, Panchkula, Punjab and haryana. WE deals in different courts and tribunals also.
Regards
Adv.kamal.grover@gmail.com
M:09814110005
Chandigarh
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
31 May 2009 at 00:41
hello all learned experts
i read that under the article 226 writ can be filed in the highcourt while under the article 32 writ can be filed in the superem court both have writ power then what is the material differnces,in the both tpes of writ
pls inform me
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
31 May 2009 at 00:38
hello all learned experts
what is the difrence between the loksabha and rajyasabha pls inform
Satish
29 May 2009 at 22:49
Resp Sirs & Mams.
Who appoint the election commissioners in India? What is term for election commissioners?
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
29 May 2009 at 20:41
dear friends,
in the sec.6A of E.C.act for confiscation of vehical and metirial, can it relised from judicial court ? however collecter is specificlly has the power in sec.6e of e.c.act .
if any case law or ruling is there then plz. send me.
thanking you.
your's -Sarvesh K Sharma
cheshta
29 May 2009 at 10:49
hello
I want to ask that what gives the goverment,the finance minister power to do retrospective amendment in law?
Many cases also had been filed against such retrospective amendments particularly amendments done in incometax act by finance ministers but all gione ion favour of goverment helding that govt.has power to do retrospective amendments.
A.Mohamed Thaheer
28 May 2009 at 14:18
1)What further course of legal action could be taken, if some time bound direction of the High Court, Chennai, is not obliged by the petitioner who filed a writ petition for quashing the CAT order for making the retiral benefits to the retired officer? (while delivering judgment by quashing the CAT order, as prayed for by the Petitioner.)
2) Whether this failure of the part of the petitioner is legally contempt or not?
A.Mohamed Thaheer
28 May 2009 at 14:07
What is the relief, if the Bench of the High Court, Chennai quashes the CAT direction, without verifying the documentary evidences and application of mind with reference to the facts of the case, the relevant statutory rules and also without giving an opportunity for filing a detailed written counter and also in the absence of the detailed argument of the case by the respondent's side?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Contradictory judgments by different benches -what remedy
What is the course of legal action for getting natural justice, when contradictory judgments were delivered by two different High court, namely Delhi High Court judgment dated 04-07-2008 and High Court, Chennai dated 30-09-2008 respectively on the very same issue of criminal misappropriation of money to the tune of Rs, 25 lakhs ( BENCH OF THE Delhi High Court Judgment), and for Rs.11,255/- (BENCH OF THE Chennai High Court Judgment, under section 13 (1) (c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
In the above said two judgments, Delhi High has given a very detailed judgment according to the statutory provisions of the relevant under the Central Civil Service Pension Rules, 1972, 80% in favour of the Accused for releasing all the retiral benefits due on the date retirement, EXCEPT UPHOLDING THE PAYMENT OF PROVISIONAL PENSION TILL THE FATE OF THE ACCUSED IN THE CRIMINAL CASE for the alleged misappropriated amount of more than 23 lakhs, read with 34 IPC>
But, the Bench of the Chennai High Court has given the judgment ADVERSELY AGAINST THE ACCUSED BY QUASHING THE CAT order which is very much similar to the Judgment of the Bench of the Delhi High Court dat
ed 04-07-2008.
The further pity in this case is the alleged misappropriation of amount is ONLY
R.11,255/- in which case also, it is pending yet to be proved in the court of law.
What is the legal remedy for the injustice done by the Bench of the High Court, Chennai?
d