Daksh
17 September 2010 at 09:27
Dear All,
We all know for sure that in open court Mr.Bhushan while arguing the case has submitted a list of Retired Chief Justice of Apex Court and dared the court to open the envelope.
I want to seek your considered views/opinion that is it appropriate for any officer of the court (be it a Senior Advocate or Ex Law Minister)to conduct himself in a more dignified way. It is evident that two wrongs cannot make a thing right still by playing for the gallary what lesson it will convey for the younger aspiring lot of professionals.
(Believe it I am not commenting on the merits of the case but my concern is solely how the Bench and Bar conducts itself for the betterment of this profession).
Thanking You and best regards
D
A
K
S
H
Anonymous
17 September 2010 at 08:00
Sir/Madam,
I have attached the file Query.pdf. Please read it to understand my questions.
Anonymous
15 September 2010 at 11:31
It is said that these days courts do not accept photos as a good evidence because it is very easy to tamper photos with computers,so some one suggested me to file photos with negatives and informed me that such photos are considered very much reliable by the courts,is he right???
Can U suggest something from your side please,to prove my residence in a certain premises,I do not have time get some documentary proof ???
Anonymous
14 September 2010 at 19:50
It is said that courts give decisions in favour of the litigants who succeed in proving their evidence beyond any (reasonable) doubt, but many a times the evidence of both the sides---Plaintiff and Defendent--- show some doubt (and such cases are very many), in such cases courts give decision in whose favour ????
Check the wording ,it is not the same and if I feel that my question was not properly understood,what is wrong in re-wording it and posting,it would have been better if you have attempted to answer differently.
Anonymous
14 September 2010 at 19:13
I have a voter card of an address which has been abandoned by me long ago,on checking voter card helpline and website,I found that this voter card has been declared non-functional.I do not have any other document to prove my age and identity,can I use this voter card as my age proof and I.D., which I still possess in original????
Anonymous
14 September 2010 at 19:04
Before hiring an Advocate,can I file an RTI
{through someone else,of course} to check how much successful my would be Advocate is in the past,how many wins,how many losses,how many compromises--he has scored ????
Anonymous
14 September 2010 at 18:09
Advocacy is considered a noble profession,but my advocate is doing his duties quite unprofessionally,whatsoever future actions are decided between us,he goes on procrastinating,I wanna leave him but fear that on leaving, he may cheat me and leak so many things to the opponent party,which may harm my case,What is remedy in such cases,like mine???
Anonymous
14 September 2010 at 16:05
Dear Friends and Collegues,
Kindly explain the grounds on which the Writ Jurisdiction of any High Court under Articles 226 and 227 comes in conflict with the provisions of Section 482 Cr.P.C petition.
Best Regards
Daksh
P J Jadhav
14 September 2010 at 16:01
I wish to know about case laws reagarding minimum subsistance allowance paid to Govt employee under suspension. Whether this allowance can be lowered below 50 percent of monthly pay
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
serice matters
i am gentleman cadet rishi rathi,undergoing training at indian military academy,dehradun,from there i have been withdrawn on disciplinary grounds due to excessive punishments,i seriously wish to get re-instated.before withdrawal no written notice was served to me, no court of inquiry was done, no board/tribunal was constituted to look into the disciplinary charges,in march-up also the commandant read his decision and no chance was given to me to speak/open my mouth even and i was withdrawn, is this the violation of principles of natural justice? ima is now claiming that they gave me a chance to speak and i had declined but in reality they never gave me a chance to speak, how can i prove that they did not gave me a chance to speak?