n v sudhakar
17 November 2010 at 17:35
Point No.1: I was an Executive Direcot of a private limited company having some shares on my name which is not listed company. Due to some differences I had to leave the said company. While I was with the said company the Managing Director took blank signature on share transfer forms with all the shareholders including my signature and kept with him. Immediately after I left the company, with out my knowledge the sharges were transferred in another employee name. I came to know that the company's auditor (chartered accountant) signed in the share transfer form as a witness.
Can a chartered accountant be witness for share transfers? If the answer is NO, then what type of action I can take against him.
Point No.2: The same chartered accountant after I left the above company, with the support of the management, filed a criminal case against me in 2005 without any proper reason only to harass me. Recently (after 5 years) that case was acquitted on the grounds of benefit of doubt. For this case, I had to visit the court about 40 hearings and spent lot of money on advocates, police and other expenses by loosing income on those days.
Since I won the case, can I take any action action that chartered accountant and if so to whom I can refer the case.
N V SUDHAKAR
adarshbuilding
17 November 2010 at 11:16
The problem is as under-
There is a military establishment for which restrictions were laid by the Central Government on basis of The Works Of Defence Act, 1903, in the year 1976, vide an SRO. The State Government before that had issued own restrictions in the area which were lesser stringent in terms of restrictions, and the same continued to be applied even after the publication of SRO by Central Government. The issues are:-
1. The original SRO issued by the Central Government is not available. Only an unauthenticated copy is held. Where can we get the authentic copy of SRO?
2. As we understand, the SRO had to be promulgated by the Collector before it is implemented. The act lays down a period of three years for that. If that has not been done, what are the options with us to enforce the SRO now?
ami
16 November 2010 at 20:28
Respected experts,Can PIL may be filed in High court for the following issue:
Out of 48 Higher sec.Schools 26 schools do not have Principals and out of 73 High schools 21 schools donot have Headmasters GrI and 40 Headmasters GrII who all have to supervise the Scolastic activities especiaally the coaching the syudents for SSLC and +2Public Exams.Teachers' associations on selfish attitude cross swords with one another and file a case ,get a stay for promotion,press the Govt for amendment of RRs ect since 2004!!!.Pleade to respond with any judgement on similar request,please.-AMI
venkatesh Rao
15 November 2010 at 15:18
Apprentice Act is a central Act. Center has framed Apprenticeship Rules acting under Sec. 37. . karnataka has also framed Apprentice Rules in excercise of powres U/s 24 (4) & (5).
Central rules provide for constitution of sub committees by the Central Apprenticeshp Council; But State rules do not provide for it.
1) Can the state form sub committes?
2) Can it frame any scheme based on the recommendation of the committee so formed?
Suchitra. S
15 November 2010 at 08:24
Respected experts, pl let me know whether postponement of BCI entrance exam justified? The reasons given are that BCI could not send preparatory material in time and it expects greater participation from State Bar Councils. Whose duty was it to send them in time? How far it is correct to restrict one's right to Practice for almost a year? Is it not violative of Constitutional rights? How they are eligible to play with our career?
Anonymous
14 November 2010 at 15:15
Are Constituent Assembly Debates privileged talk or they are admissible as evidence in competent court for the purpose of interpreting the Constitution? I am referring to the following Constituent Assembly Debates: http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/debates/debates.htm
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 22:47
Ld counsels,
High Court passed a non-speaking order dismissing the writ appeal at admission.
Does this non-speaking order a valid ground for review.
Or will an appeal filed on this ground before the SC will once again be sent back for review to HC.
Please clarify.
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 14:04
Ld Counsels,
A writ petition was allowed by High Court. Then the respondent filed a Writ appeal under clause 15 of Letters Patent.
High court dismissed the appeal at admission level itself and a reivew of this dismissal was not accepted.
What is next step available for the respondet in Writ Petition.
Should the SLP before Supreme Court need to be against the order of Writ Appeal or againt the order of Writ Petition.
Please clarify. Thanks
shantanu dekhane
12 November 2010 at 09:36
What is the Concept of the Secularism with Reference to Indian Socio Legal Context?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can a writ petition be filed in High Court for grievance not falling under Part III of Constitution?
Can a writ petition be filed in High Court against the State, seeking High Court to give directions to State for giving relief against any grievance not falling under Part III of Constitution? Like name not included in voters list, even though all formalities of submitting required documents are done.