tarun
26 December 2010 at 06:35
respected members
in a cross case it is alleged that the one of the accused hit the complainant by iron rod and disfigure the left index finger of the complainant, this is a false allegation case regisrered u/s 325 i.p.c, and the accused filed anticipatory bail application before session judge, the addl. session judge ordered the accused to join investigation on 27.12.2010, now the IO in this threatning the accused persons that they must have to write that the iron rod has been throwan in a running cannel(nehar) or they must have to produce to iron rod, but when the crime has not been committed and there is no iron rod so alleged, then how the accused produce it? the I.O also threatning that if accused will not obey then he will say to judge that the accused had not joined the investigation or the accused did not cooperate in investigation, and the anticipatory bail will not be granted to accused, now the accused has to join investigation, but the case is false and i.o is making pressure. what are the remedies availble to accused person??????? the i.o is in favour of complainant who is also accused in cross case. now what are the remedies avaialbe to accused against i.o to avoid forcible disclosure.
Anonymous
26 December 2010 at 02:06
Ld counsels,
Can you please let me know about the translation to english of certain
documents. Is there a need to file a separate application for it.
Can the same be filed along with the SLP.
Pleae also let me know if it is mandatory to fiel sucha an application or can the Hbl. court do the translation on its own.
Please clarify.
Thanks.
SRIPRAKASH BHATTACHARYA
25 December 2010 at 21:22
DEAR SIR,
CAN ANY TELL ME THAT WHY THE UNION GOVERNMENT DOES NOT MAKE MANDTORY THE FOLLOWINGS:
1. EVERY ADVOCATE, IF HE/SHE IS ALLOWED/LICENSED TO PRACTICE MUST MENTION HIS/HER BAR COUNCIL REGISTRATION NO. ON THE DOCUMENTS WHENEVER HE IS GIVING ANY SERVICES IN LIEU OF FEES/MONEY.
2. EVERY DOCTOR MUST MENTION HIS/HER REGISTRATION NO. ON THE PRESCRIPTION DOCUMENTS WHENEVER HE IS GIVING ANY SERVICES IN LIEU OF FEES/MONEY.
WHY THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA OF SUPREME COURT AS WELL AS OF HIGH COURTS/DISTRICT COURTS + MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AS WELL AS INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DO NOT MAKE SUCH PRACTICES MANADATORY AND PUNSHIBLE IF NOT PROVIDED.
I SHALL BE GRATEFUL IF ANYONE THROWS SOME LIGHT ON THESE ISSUES.
Sriprakash Bhattacharya
bhattacharyasriprakash@gmail.com
tvrh prasad
25 December 2010 at 19:57
I want to file a P.I.L. in A.P. High court, to stop the recommendations of Sri Krishna Committee, which was formed to division Andhra Pradesh as Telangana and Andhra, due to the report influence will fell on both places of students community (50 Lakhs of students ) for 120 days. Is it legal
Please send me grounds and Proforma for PIL
pramod tadakhe
25 December 2010 at 19:13
a tahsildar issued a residencial certificate on complaint of strenger and explainatio given by person to whom certificate is issued and discussion with pp he reject the certificate can we apprpach to high court and on which base
Anonymous
25 December 2010 at 08:22
A tahsildar has issued two legal heir certificates. What can i do to challenge the second certificate?
Anonymous
23 December 2010 at 21:45
PIO send RTI reply by ordinary post.
Our post man is very easy to be manipulated.
So I wanna get RTI replies either by HAND or by REGD. POST only, I am ready to pay extra money also ,
Is it possible,if yes, how???
What steps should I take????
Aashish Satpute.
22 December 2010 at 17:33
The prosecution has applied for Narco analysis examination and Brain Electrical Activation profile (BEAP) of accused to prevent criminal activities in the future as well as in the said offence(i.e he was charge sheeted for 7 bomb blasts and acquitted in all cases)where it is difficult to gather evidence through ordinary means.
The accused raised an objection that prosecution cannot carry these without his consent as it is violation of his fundamental right guaranteed under ART.20(3),and ART.21 of Indian constitution.
trial court has allowed the application of prosecution. the accused challenged the order of the trial court in the high court.
The high court also reject the application of accused and confirms the order of trial court.
THE accused prefers appeal against the order of trial court and confirming order of high court in supreme court on following grounds.
The involuntary administration of these techniques violates the right against “Self incrimination” enumerated in art20(3) and art.21 of Indian constitution
The investigation use of impugned techniques create a likelihood of incrimination for the subject.
The result derived from the above techniques amounts to ” Testimonial compulsion” thereby violating right guaranteed under art.20(3).
The involuntary administration of above techniques exceed the reasonable restriction on “personal liberty” guaranteed under art.21 of constitution.
above was discussion between me and frendz while in library…………..
Q.1 IS SUCH EXAMINATION VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT UNDER ART.20(3).
Q.2 IS THERE ANY CASE LAW FOR SUCH VIOLATION?
PLZ GIVE ALL DIRECTION HOW TO TACKLE SUCH PROBLEM……
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Interim relief in SLP
Dear Experts,
Is there any restrictions to prayers in the interim relief in an SLP.
Is it ppssible to pray for the interpretation of a statute and lay down guidelines in the interim relief of SLP before SC.
In order to decide the matter in the main prayer it is required to have a guide lines laid-down.
Is it that such generic prayers are not allowed in the interim relief. Please clarify.
Thanks