Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 14:26
Civil Judge Ajay Pandey, who sits in the Tees Hazari Courts, walked to Anna's Stage Breaking all the code of ethics of Judiciary.
So what does Tees Hazari Courts means
&
What are the code of ethics of a judge can anybody provide me the copy of it . Whether each state his own code of ethics related to judge.
Or any act is there which can be applied while discussing the Judge code of ethics.
Thanks
C.NOWSHAD
26 August 2011 at 08:25
In a university arts and science college, where my friend is studing, the principal, hod and the staffs are not allowing my friend to keep a small beard and insisting him to clean shave... last day he was suspended from college... what actions can be taken against them..?
PARTHA SARKAR
25 August 2011 at 23:47
I want justice and equity. Proving adultery is very difficult even photograph is not enough to satisfy court. On the other hand DM, SDO is supporting her reason many one of it for their self. Trying shielding their subordinate because if it is exposed many officers/employees will be in troubles. As per recent information she also deprived her first illicit person and enjoying with a married man as second illicit person. She is staying 430 km away from me. I am not getting justice.
Anonymous
25 August 2011 at 17:57
hello Sir..
My bike got stolen by one of the employee working in University. I have all the documents of my bike.University has its own security so I cannot enter . only students and employees can enter into the university. I came to know that bike was stolen by one of the employee working in that university. I kept police case but its no use BCZ that employee never takes my bike out of campus.More over, he keeps University logo sticker on the bike so, no police ask him for bike documents. Security checks all the vehicles and its details at the entrance of the university. My question can I ask by RTI to PIO of the university give me list of bikes roaming in the university with out proper papers and the copies of documents of my bike with my bike number? Can I able to trace the information through RTI from PIO of the university..
Thanks
Anonymous
24 August 2011 at 18:41
the below matter has been said by the lawyer in our state to by client so i want to known the meaning of it & is there in our indian law system if yes than any case on it
In a Letter Or Notice if the above words are mentioned on the top of the Letter Or Notice.
"Without Prejudice OR With Prejudice Or
Privilege OR Privileged "
What it is the meaning of the Words if mention under the letter or notice.
I have heard that if any of this words are written under the letter or notice than it seems that it is not for the interpretation and also not for the legal evidence in the court.That the letter is not use for the evidence in the court & also cant interpreted it.
Also Pls Tell Me With Us Expert advice What do this words means & Can be Written Under any Stamp paper or affidavit.
"Without Prejudice OR With Prejudice Or
Privilege OR Privileged "
Also in india dismiss without prejudice or without prejudice words are used in a judgment if yes than as per the dismiss without prejudice means what?
Thanks
A.P.Rajagopal
24 August 2011 at 18:05
A citizen of india who has been appointed by president of india to serve as governor in one state and he has shifted his family from home state to serving state and his name in electrol roll has been deleted in home state and added in electrol roll of serving state.he had used his voting right in the serving state in the past election which had been held 5 months ago. meanwhile after serving state elections are over he applied for deletion of name in serving state election roll and obtained the deletion certificate from election department. he is going to continue his service in serving state for another 1 year but with deletion certificate he had applied for enrolling his name in home state electrol roll where election is due within 6 months. is it correct to excercise the voting right two times within 9 months that too in different states as per representative of people act? kindly clarify
Anonymous
24 August 2011 at 15:44
Classification has been made by judiciary as justified and unjustified strike. This concept is used to decide whether the workmen are entitled to wage during strike period?
Case law required.
Also strike is not a Fundamental Right Am i Right ? Is there any case law which say that strike is not a Fundamental Right or it is a Fundamental Right ?
Thanks
Anonymous
23 August 2011 at 21:58
The employer had filed recall application against the ex- parte award of the labour court without mentioning the act under which the recall application had been filed not by the party but by the authorized representative of the company simple plain paper without affidavit and without delay condone application after 30 days of publication.
However it is pertinent to mention here that the award is not ex-parte as the company has filed w/s, rejoinder affidavit, refused to file documents ad absented itself deliberately in management witness and arguments. It has also filed various interlocutory applications/ objections rejected before passing award under the direction of high court to decide the issue at earliest.
Now challenging before the writ court the award, the recall application which was rejected under the state act while the reference order is in the central act.
Is this issue will have any serious implication in the writ court?
How this issue should be argued before the writ court?
Is there any ruling in support of submission.
Let me know.
Anonymous
23 August 2011 at 17:41
Ld Counsels,
There is an adverse finding made by High Court in a proceedings against public prosecutor high court, about fabricating criminal records by the police.
The division bench without delving on this adverse finding confirmed the order of single judge and refused to give information to accused under RTI regarding fabrication.
Will this adverse finding operate as a res judicata against the accused in agitating during trial that the criminal records are fabricated.
The accused have taken departmental action against the police. Will that be overlooked due to the adverse finding.
Please calrify.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 21 ipc or artilce 311 both covers.
Article 311 in The Constitution Of India 1949
311. Dismissal, removal or reduction in rank of persons employed in civil capacities under the Union or a State
(1) No person who is a member of a civil service of the Union or an all India service or a civil service of a State or holds a civil post under the Union or a State shall be dismissed or removed by a authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed
(2) No such person as aforesaid shall be dismissed or removed or reduced in rank except after an inquiry in which he has been informed of the charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those charges Provided that where it is proposed after such inquiry, to impose upon him any such penalty, such penalty may be imposed on the basis of the evidence adduced during such inquiry and it shall not be necessary to give such person any opportunity of making representation on the penalty proposed: Provided further that this clause shall not apply
(a) where a person is dismissed or removed or reduced in rank on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction on a criminal charge; or
(b) where the authority empowered to dismiss or remove a person or to reduce him in rank ins satisfied that for some reason, to be recorded by that authority in writing, it is not reasonably practicable to hold such inquiry; or
(c) where the President or the Governor, as the case may be, is satisfied that in the interest of the security of the State, it is not expedient to hold such inquiry
(3) If, in respect of any such person as aforesaid, a question arises whether it is reasonably practicable to hold such inquiry as is referred to in clause ( 2 ), the decision thereon of the authority empowered to dismiss or remove such person or to reduce him in rank shall be final.
Query: As per above artilce what does civil services means does it cover any police officer or any rank, Minister, MLA in short how are covered under the civil services words all so what do u mean by goverment officials.
Case law required to understand more about the goverment officials & civil services.
Also it has been said that a under artilce 311 of the above to allow termination of services on charges of corrupt practice after begining of trial in competent court or after the competent court has has proved the accused guilty & has been proved as convicted. case law required.
can we say section 21 of the IPC Public servant comes under Artilce 311 of the COnsitution of India, 1949.
any case law which say yes that section 21 of the IPC Public servant comes under Artilce 311 of the COnsitution of India, 1949. ORRRRRRRR Artilce 311 covers section 21 of the IPC.
Thanks