PARTHA SARKAR
29 December 2011 at 23:40
W.B State information commission (WBIC) is not acting as per law and thus information seekers are harassed. They are violating the RTI Act openly. I have many persoanl grievances and lots of documentary proofs.
I want to file writ against the SIC.
I have 2 grounds:
1. SIC not acting as per law. Not penalizing the defaulter and nor executing their order.
2. SIC not disposing of many 2 appeal/complaint petitions lying with them since long back despite several complaint letters followed by RTI applications.
I will be grateful if anyone helps me to send e-mail a sample writ petition on such matter or to prepare prayer portion of the petition.
Regards
Partha Sarkar
sarkar.partha@rediffmail.com
Anonymous
27 December 2011 at 20:30
sir, one of my friend has taken hand loan 400000/.promisory notes has been excuted and case was orered as ex parte degree.and he set aside petition has filed. i want to file attachment before judgement petition.pls give me profama and procedure.
Anonymous
27 December 2011 at 18:04
Is cooperative society comes under Right to Information Act directly or through Registrar of cooperative society?
bhanu pratap720
27 December 2011 at 12:37
besides the case law of 2003 (7)scc 730 are there any other case law which support the argument that a writ of certiorari is maintainable against a n organization reistered under society registration act
KAMARAJ BHARATHY G
23 December 2011 at 22:00
Dear Friends, Please discuss about the following matter
A person has 7 years bar experiance and he joined in government service. At this juncture, whether he is eligible to be appointed as District Judge, as per article 233 (2) of the Constitutuion of India?
Anonymous
21 December 2011 at 11:19
To start a Non veg Restaurant who will issue a valid license ? It's a matter of Pollution by a Non veg hotel in residencial areas. My municipal Athority is saying,"we are not authority to issue a such license."
Who makes rules , regulation and give guidelines to such business ?
Anonymous
21 December 2011 at 01:15
meaning of consitutional body & statutory body as per the law. if possible post the full judgment if any so i can be able to understand more.
thanks
Anonymous
20 December 2011 at 22:31
Dear friends I am working on article 356 indian constitution as a researcher and need some material ,seminar papers ,articles ,case laws on the topic please help me
Regards
PEER MOHSIN
Anonymous
20 December 2011 at 12:34
Under Rule 16 of CCS (CCA) rules, 1965, the office (a central govt statutory body) have issued memo(by CEO) to Mr X in Dec 2011 on ground of imputation of misconduct. Intent to charge with minor penalty had been indicated for which explanation had been sought. The misconduct (favouring a firm in official work) had been indicated as committed around 5 years back.
2 advises of CVC recvd by office in March 2008 and Feb 2011 but never communicated to `X`by office.
Suddenly the office asked (by CEO) in Dec 2011 and asked explanation.
In 2010, office (Mr `S`) appointed `X` as Inquiry Officer (IO) in a case on Mr `A` under Rule 14 (major penalty) of CCS(CCA) Rules. The case has moved further with 3-4 hearings under the IO ship of `X`.
On receipt of above memo, `X` replied to all the facts of the case, apprehending conspiracy by some office colleagues after 6 years, requesting clean chit and also drew their attention that he was appointed IO by them(Mr `S`) a year back (irrespective of CVC advises), meaning that all is clear from vigilance side for Mr `X`. Vigilance department being custodian of all cases, knows explanation memo given to Mr `X` as well as case on `A`.
Reply submitted few days back by `X` to CEO.
After few days, in the case pertaining to Mr `A`, office reconfirmed appointment (by Mr `S`) of Mr `X` as IO in above case for moving ahead with hearings.
Now what is the position of `X`
i) Is the official explanation earlier asked (by CEO) is just an explanation sought or is it a charge sheet, though he is IO in another case.
ii) Can `X` move ahead with hearings on `A`. The official Presenting officer(PO) in `A` case knows nothing about memo given to Mr`X ` and is requesting for starting the hearings in the `A` case.
iii) or Mr`X should wait in case on `A`, till he gets clean chit from office(CEO) for his own memo.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Civ appeal 6454 0f 2011
My RTI query to Min of Fin on " total amount being sanctioned to all NGOs in the past three years, Total amount of foreign money received by all the NGOs, total amount of tax exemptions provided to them in all" was first ref to Min of Social Justice under Sec 6(3) of RTI Act.Min of SJ returned the query to Min of Fin setting that query " does not pertain to their ministry".Eventually info was denied stating that info are scattered , held by more than many ministries and hence not transferred blah blah blah.
My first appeal has now been rejected stating " order of CPIO is upheld as it is seen that since no data is maintained by this office.In addition detailed interpretation of the statute in respect of specific cases does not constitute information under RTI Act. This is also coherent with the observation of Hon'Ble SC .......in the civil appeal No 6454 of 2011 arising out of SLP(C) No 7526 on what constitute information."
I need to move my second appeal . Need your expertise to frame my appeal. equest help please.