Member (Account Deleted)
19 December 2011 at 14:35
Who shall have the power to clarify on the following issue: Is it the Supreme Court or the Judge( 3 Bench Members) who wrote the judgement but now retired?
Anonymous
16 December 2011 at 22:53
Dear LCI members,
Can anyone of you help me to provide the full syllabus of Exams of Advocate on record in supreme court to be held in june 2012? Pls. consider as urgent and thanx in advance.
Anonymous
16 December 2011 at 17:54
Hi Everybody Me and my girlfriend are planing to go on a trip of two days. So we are planing to stay in a hotel there.Is there any problem in staying in a hotel together.
And I have also heard that sometimes cops ask such couples to confirm from their parents. As I know they do so only fon some money as nobody will want his/her parent to call and confirm rather than giving some rupees to the cops. I request you guys to give some tips to tackle these cops.
please help me out.
thanx
S C KHOSLA
16 December 2011 at 15:24
In a case under CCS (CCA Rules)1965, a charged official (CO), desired change in Inquiry Officer (IO) on ground of bias in its very first Regular Hearing (RH)through a formal letter.
The IO gave stay to RH and sent the CO`s request for change in IO ship to the consideration of Disciplinary Authority (DA)as per rules.
The DA replied to CO rejecting his request for change in IO ship and marked copy of communication to IO and Presenting officer (PO) in the case.
Now on receipt of this letter in IOs office, whether IO`s stay to RH is automatically gets vaccated or IO should wait for Presenting officer (PO) formal comunication of pray for vacating the above stay in RH.
bhanu pratap720
15 December 2011 at 13:01
CAN A WRIT OF CERTIORARI(UNDER ARTICLE 226) BE ISSUED AGAINST A PRIVATE BODY REGISTERED UNDER SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT FOR DISMISSAL OF AN EMPLOYEE ?
raghu
14 December 2011 at 14:34
Do the sons/daughters of a notary public advocate of OBC category whose income is below 4.50 lakh fall in creamy layer? A line in this article (http://www.airwebworld.com/articles/index.php?article=1533) says that the children of lawyers come in creamy layer.
Anonymous
13 December 2011 at 23:28
Dear Experts,
1) Case filed by People For Animals in Delhi HC and Delhi HC ruled that airguns need license and impugned the Central Government notification No. GSR 991 which exempted air guns from license. The judgement is available at http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1406083/
2) Three affected parties have approached Supreme Court against this Delhi HC order:
a) PC 19693-19695/2011 (NRAI Vs. People for Animals)
b) PC 20773-20775/2011 (Union of India Vs. People for Animals)
c) PC 19880-19882/2011 (M/s AIRGUN,RIFL.PIST.& PELLET MF.ASN Vs. People for Animals)
These three different cases are linked to each other where the Respondent is the same 'People for Animals'.
Can any more person also file his own petition or join these existing petitions in Supreme Court, if he feels aggrieved and affected by this utterly erroneous judgement of Delhi High Court?
Can he combine SLP with writ under Article 32 if he feels the judgement is dwelling on erroneous precedents set by other HCs and blindly followed by Delhi HC and implemented by executive. Therefore in addition to SLP, the executive needs writ directions and clarity to cure the cumulative affect of these misleading judgements by various HCs including Delhi HC?
rajasekaran
13 December 2011 at 12:00
For an application/appeal under 19 of MSMED Act read with section 34 of Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996 pre-deposit of 75% of award is mandated. Are the Courts entitled to condone delay beyond three months and 30 days in filling application with 75% pre-deposit? . If so under which provision of law representation delay/ filling delay is condonable?
rajasekaran
Renu Renu MM
12 December 2011 at 16:51
Dear Sir,
This is with regard to a community called KANIYAR in Karnataka spread in 4 districts namely Bangalore, Mysore, Mandya and Chamaraja Nagar. This community is categorized in the list of Backward classes under Sl No 47 along with other castes namely Kaniyaru, Kaniyan, Kanyan, kanizan. Here Kaniyan and Kanyan communities are also categorised as a Scheduled Tribe restricting to Kollegal taluk of Chamarajanagar. This is because Kollegal taluk prior to 1956 was in the Tamil Nadu state and the castes namely KANIYAN and KANYAN are a Scheduled Tribe in that state ,hence when Kollegal was merged with then Mysore state these two castes were given ST status restricting to kollegal taluk of Chamarajanagar,but elsewhere in the state of Karnataka this community is treated as Backward caste.
In 1978 Govt of Karnataka by an order clarified that the caste namely Kaniyan and Kanyan with other castes that were enjoying the status both as a Scheduled tribe and Backward caste in certain districts were removed from the list of Backward caste only in those areas where they were identified both as a ST and OBc. Hence these two castes namely Kaniyan and Kanyan in Kollegal taluk of Chamrajanagar were to be considered aas Scheduled tribe .
Now a caste bearing the name KANIYAR are doing fraud by changing the last letter "R" of KANIYAR to letter "N" as Kaniyan and falsely claiming to be a Scheduled tribe .
As per the constitution a Kaniyan who is a resident of Kollegal taluk of Chamarajanagar district of Karnataka only has the eligibility to claim as Scheduled tribe ,but the Kaniyars who are vishnavites and belong to backward caste by just changing the letter r to n by fraud are getting the ST certificates by falsely claiming to be the native of Kollegal by either giving a wrong or fake address and some by falsely including their names in the voters list even though they haven’t lived or even stayed there even for a day.
The tasildar of Kollegal have already issued the fake certificates since 1975 onwards and prior to this the certificates have not been issued to Kaniyar community. Now the second generation are being utilizing this certificate as their parents have already claimed fake ST certificates.
The case studies of few of the Kaniyar who have claimed to be Kaniyans have been studied. The 1st generation who have claimed false ST certificates for their job, reveals that the caste documented in their Primary School records is KANIYAR(Backward caste) This persists till they enter into the service and finally the name of the caste completely changes to KANIYAN and ST and the native place turns out top be KOllegal instead of other places by tampering. The officials at all levels are supporting them as they have been bribed by the people of this community as these people are well placed in all rungs of the government and are quite wealthy.
The GOK has clarified that the castes namely KANIYAR and KANIYAN are not synonymous and are different . In spite of this clarification the Government offices at all levels starting from Taluk level till the directorate has been supporting the community to commit fraud. This is causing atrocity to the real Scheduled tribes and they have been deprived of their benefits as this community people are snatching their benefits.
As per the Havanoor Report on the study of the Other Backward Castes in Karnataka has stated that there are only 150 families/household of KANIYANS in Kollegal
taluk and that they are not traced in any other places in Karnataka.
The Directorate of Scheduled Tribe Welfare Department has gone a step ahead to treat that both Kaniyan and Kaniyar as synonymous even though there is clarity in this case as 2 different castes both according to the constitution and also clarification from the Govt of Karnataka. This department has utilized the money earmarked for the studies to be carried out for the development of Scheduled Tribe has been utilized for the study on the Kaniyars(OBC)on their anthropological lineage so that they may be depicted as a tribe and then submit it to the government for the benefit of Kaniyar community. The Kaniyar Maha Sabha has requested to carry out the anthropological studies no other community under the Serial No 47 in the list of Backward caste has requested for the studies to be carried out (Kani, Kanisan Kanyan) The Deparment of ST director rate has submitted to the Govt of Karnataka that the caste namely Kani, Kanisan Kanyan are all synonymous to Kaniyan and Kanyan , ST restriced to Kollegal taluk and the area restrict to issue ST certificate to these community needs to be studied and has seeked the approval of the Govt. Thus it has misled the govt and also playing fraud joining hands with the KANIYAR community.
Kanisan who are the derived the lineage from Kerala has already declared themselves that they are Backward caste as they are treated in Kerala and that they want to remain as a Backward caste. Even though they want to remain as a Backward caste the Directorate wants this community also to be treated as tribe and hence submitting false report in order to favor the fraud community.
My question is that whom should i complain to ? can i write to CJI? Hw can i bring this to the notice of St community? and hw can i fight against this fraud community legally and also against the corrupt officials of the Directorate of ST welfare in Karnataka?
The CRE Cell is also hand in glove with this community and also the taluk offices that are issuing fake certificate have to be exposed . This nexus should be brought into lime light.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Amendment act cwa 1959
What is exact name called after amendment ed of said Act.? Its call As ICAI OR ICMAI Act 1959.
If ICWAI Question Against to eliminate name Chartered form ICAI. its valid? I again little confuse Abt What name called ICWAI OR ICAI OR ICAMI