yogesh
24 October 2009 at 20:04
Please inform what is the meaning of final synposis.Is it the part of rejoinder? or for concluding submissions of any trail???
Mohamed Ali
24 October 2009 at 11:15
We have a Muslim partition suite pending in Final decree proceedings and is adjourned for 31st of this month, for which preleminary dated almost 1970..
We are LR's of one plaintiff, plaintiff had 3 children two daughters and one son who had predeceased her, but his childrens were wrongly brought on record while filing final decree petition in the year 1989,
plaintiff daughter has filed an Interlocutary application in 2008 to strike out these LR's of predeceased sons children from record as they are not entitle fo share as per Mohameddan law.
Also, In this Final decree proceddings there are 3 non-bonafide subsequent purcahser who has some how been made as parties as additional defendants,
And one of the purchaser has done out of court compromise with some of decree holders except one plaintiff for one of the decree schedule property against the will of lR's of one plaintiff who has objected saying that First the Interlocutary application to strike out LR's of plaintiff who are not entitle for share must be disposed off as there is problem amongs LR"s of one plaintiff must be settled,then any compromise will be entertained by the objecting LR's of plaintiff.
The Honorable court agreed to dispose of our IA to strike out LR's of plaintiff who are not entitle for share and posted our I.A for Orders two hearing back, Now after 2 hearings suddenly Judge is taking a
U-turn and not writing Order on our I.A , further saying he will refer the case to Lokadalat if the parties agreed and try for compromise with subsequent non-bonafide purchasers with out disposing our IA, As per the Judge, as of now tour IA will be kept as it is.., As one of the non-bonafide purchaser is an influential person may be Judge under some influence acting this way,
We are very frustrated, our simple I.A is pending from past 2 years we being Plaintiff , our I.A is not entertained and dispose off, the Judge is more interested in compromising the non-bonafide subsequent purchaser who has no equity as per decree.
We are fed up with this trial court judges atittudes, Can we approach high court as our IA is pending from almost 2 years.
Dhanesh
24 October 2009 at 10:48
Dear Experts
I am being cheated by two companies. one is my own bank and other is that company with which i have my demat account.
I issue a cheque to India Infoline Ltd. (IIL) of Rs.5000/- to give credit to my Demat account on 09/07/2009 from my saving account in Axis Bank. The said cheque was passed from my SB account on 11/07/2009 and the amount was debited. But IIL people are saying that they not received the credit.
Now what should i do?
Dhanesh
Anonymous
23 October 2009 at 23:45
Now a days in metro cities, housing socities construction companies are using foregin places names in india such as Singapore city, Malaysia city etc.(these names can be seen in Hyderabad). Municipal Administration is not objecting while approving plan and giving permission.
My question is
Under what law a suit can be filed to prohibit using foregin places names in India?
Anonymous
23 October 2009 at 23:34
Respected Experts,
We acquired ancestral property/agricultural land in a village. Due to naxalite problem none of our family member is visiting there since past 15 years. If we visit we will be killed. Land has been occupied by the naxalites and they r doing farming. Now when naxal movement will go, Can we claim that land back. Will law of adverse posession apply here, if it will left for some more period. Plz. Advice. Thanks.
vinod bansal
23 October 2009 at 22:18
R/Members
Construction work of Rs. 3,oo,ooo/- was alloted through open tender to a contractor by Marketing board (Govt of Haryana)and written contract was executed in between both parties,contractor has completed his work within time and thereafter demanded his payment in the month of july 2008,but officer of marketing board are continously avoiding payment of contracter,in reply of legal notice they have replied that payment is outstanding due to absence of technical sanction of their higher officer,now what is legal remady available to contractor for recovery of his payment. Thanks
Regards
Abhay
23 October 2009 at 22:11
suppose 'A' makes a proposal to 'B' by letter to sell his house and gives 10 days to reply..now 'B' on 6th day posted his assent by letter but it was not known to 'A' that 'B' has posted him the letter and on 7th day calls him('B') up to revoke the proposal as soon as he calls 'B', 'B' picks up the phone and says that he is agreed to buy now the communication is made between the two....will it b a contract???
is it necessary that acceptance should be done in the same manner as it was offered to the offeree ????
P.K.Haridasan
23 October 2009 at 21:36
In an old 1936 registered documentin Kerala , the name given to it as Mumpattachit.The duration of possession of land was for one year only. What would be status of the holder after one year. Can a joint name holder of the document file a suit for partition now based upon it. Are they not tresspassers after one year. Please enlighten me.
NB
23 October 2009 at 17:18
Sir,
If a civil appeal which has been dismissed by the court in absence of plaintiff, I would like to know where appeal can be filed and what is the time limit for the same.
thanks in advance for anticipation
NNB
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 75 of Indian Contract Act
Dear Sir,
I am expecting your kind clarification on the following issues:
1. In a Contract for Employment the Staff wantonly committed a breach of Contract and failed to come for duty as such the employer had issued a notice under Section 75 of the Indian Contract Act for rescinding the contract and now he is intending to file a suit for damages as against the Staff for the loss caused by the staff.
2. But in the said Contract there is no Clause stipulating for damages in the event of breach of Contract, so under these circumstances whether a suit for damages will lie?
3. Since no penalty clause is stipulated in the Contract as such is there any yardstick available for ascertaining the “quantum of damages”?
4. Furthermore the Contract was not written in the Stamped Papers but it was written in the Plain white papers and signed by the Staff. Whether such a Contract is maintainable under law and whether it can be impounded during the trial stage?
Kindly advise me in this regard.