R/Members
Kindly enlighten me regarding meaning of latter patent appeal.Regards
Father, his son and some third persons are running a registered Partnership Firm and thereafter his son became an Advocate as such he had retired from the firm and practicing as an Advocate. Now my doubt is, Sir, whether the son being an Advocate shall conduct the cases for his erstwhile partnership firm by filing his Vakalat?
Is there any bar under any law? Kindly advise me.
I want to know what is the limitation period for execution of an award passed against a society for recovery of sum under Maha Societies Act
Dear Sir,
Please provide me the case laws which has favoured the petitioner for nonjoinder of the affected parties??
Regards
Dear Experts
Please advise whether the petition can be dismissed on the non joinder of the affected parties even his fundamental rights have been infringed??
If the individual does not want his colleagues to made his parties and also doesnot want the affected order should passed against him??
Reagards
Dear Sir,
Suppose 'P' VS 'R1, R2' is contesting a civil suit. Any Interlocutory order passed against P. Then P decides to file revision as
Crl Revision: P Vs State
so that the R will not interfere and the order will be easily set aside. It is wrong or right.
Or
We have to make the same parties in the revision which were in the civil suit or in the order.
Dear Respected experts,
I have posted the message earlier but there are ambiguities and different opinions are there which made me confused in taking the correct procedure
I reconcile the same
In previous hearing at the Hon'ble CAT, I made my plea to file the writeen arguments which was turned down by the Hon'ble Tribunal But some of the members advise me to go ahead in filing the same as if it get rejected It will be the good ground of AppealIn the light of the aforementioned facts what should I do whether I should file the Written Arguments or not?
Your opinion definately help me in giving right direction
Regards
Thanks in anticipation
Dear Respected experts,
I have posted the message earlier but there are ambiguities and different opinions are there which made me confused in taking the correct procedure
I reconcile the same
In previous hearing at the Hon'ble CAT, I made my plea to file the writeen arguments which was turned down by the Hon'ble Tribunal But some of the members advise me to go ahead in filing the same as if it get rejected It will be the good ground of Appeal
In the light of the aforementioned facts what should I do whether I should file the Written Arguments or not?
Your opinion definately help me in giving right direction
Regards
Thanks in anticipation
Dear Learned friends,
I have a case of property from plaintiffs in which the Ex-parte injunction order has passed after that adverse parties file W.S after that I filed the fresh Amendment on the same cause of action but narrated all matter of fact which are not told in Plaint and after that Rejoinder of W.S.
But the court has dismissed the amendment that the trial has commenced or started off?
While the amendment the court has to be very linent as [Andhra Bank v. ABN Amro Bank N.V. & Ors (Civil Appeal No. 2946 of 2007) decided on 10 July, 2007]
2. Will the application for filling REPLICA is possible after rejoinder so that I copy all the part of the 'dismissed amendment' into REPLICA.
3. Any amendment granting SCC or HC ruling and its crucial wonderful marker lines in judgment if any to be noticed ?
Essential commodities Act /desi ghee
R/Members
Kindly tell me whether desi/pure ghee is covered by any control order/notification of central or state govt. under Essential commodities Act.Thanx