Anil Dabir
13 December 2014 at 11:07
Why is a L&L agreement usually for 11 months peroid?
Partha Roy
13 December 2014 at 10:54
Vide an Order passed by NCDRC, the O.P, a builder, was directed to pay Rs.50 Lakhs + interest to us. O.P filed SLP in SCI against above order and the following direction was issued by the Hon'ble Court: "We direct learned counsel for the petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) in this Registry within a period of two weeks from today. Upon such deposit being made, issue notice returnable in the month of February, 2015. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted"
My questions are as under:
1.Does the order imply that the SLP filed by the Petitioner has been allowed and that they may file an appeal?
2.What happens if the amount is not deposited in the registry within the prescribed period?
3. If the SLP is dismissed will the amount be released directly to us?
4. The Hon'ble Judge verbally mentioned that he will 'execute' on the next hearing date - what did he mean?
With Seasons Greetings to the erudite experts of Lawyersclub
Partha Roy
vivek sood
12 December 2014 at 22:15
this is the message i have seen on the status of my case status. today was first hearing and my lawyer told he has taken a date for next hearing . however the status on court cases in this : Complainant in person.
Bailable  warrants  issued  against  the  accused  received  back
unexecuted.  Let fresh bailable warrants be issued against the accused on filing
of fresh address alongwith PF/RC for 10.04.2015.
Sanjay
12 December 2014 at 21:58
Author : Sanjay
Posted 3 years ago
The owner of the agricultural land in Madhya pradesh is the guarantor of loans for industrial purposes.The agricultural land owned by the guarantor is also not mortgaged with the bank. The area of land is 4.5 acres and crops are being shown in the Khasra plan also. Sarafi act is not applicable as the decree is of 1992.DRT Jabalpur has initiated the orders for attachment of the said agricultural land due to non payment of dues.DRT has initiated sale proceeding against the guarantor and the recovery officer has published the ad in the newspaper. Petition filed in High Court. hearing pending. What should be the couse of action now.
J K Agrawal
12 December 2014 at 21:25
In a case which i represent, a car was flushed away in nala due to heavy rains and the husband (driver) and wife drowned and died.
The insurance company taking plea of "Act of God" in defense.
Please help me to give some citations where in this type of cases, the Court awarded claim taking it as an accident.
I tried to search it but failed.
Thanks
harjeet
12 December 2014 at 18:19
sir my family belong to sc category from punjab but my family was migrated to maharashtra in 1976. i wanted to obtain sc certificate for central purpose ,so sir can you please tell me from where i can get the caste certificate. i was born in maharashtra .and my cast is not listed in maharashtra state.
Kvijay12345
12 December 2014 at 17:32
Is it must for the NBFC to go for the EP from civil court,after the arbitration award is passed in their favor before towing away the vehicle financed? During this EP in civil court,does the borrower gets a chance to put his say and to defend himself? Can NBFC tow away the vehicle forcibly,purely on the basis of this arbitration award passed unilaterally, without the knowledge to the borrower and without the copy of that award to the borrower and that is also without the EP in civil court for that arbitration award?The police try to give this case a civil look.Is it not a criminal matter to tow away ones vehicle forcibly without informing him?The police are not keen to book the NBFC employees under the criminal sections of theft.In such situation what are the remedies left for the borrower? There is a dispute between borrower and the nbfc over the discrepancies and modifications made in the loan agreement in the absence of the borrower without his knowledge.
swagat
12 December 2014 at 16:24
Wife is living with her parents sinec 45 days on some mutaul differences. Please guide if filing an application under section 9A will act as a procteion against any proceeding under section 498A .??
Sh@ktiiiiii
12 December 2014 at 15:48
I had purchased a flat in Andheri from Builder directly after the formation of society.(It was builder's unsold flat)
Sale deed was registered and all transaction has been through.We have OC copy, Registered sale deed and posession letter.We are currently staying in the said flat.
However Society has refused to transfer the flat in our name as it has to settle some scores with the builder. Builder had taken advance maintenance from few people and have not returned them . Builder says he to get dues from other people of the society and hence there has to be full settlement. This settlement of funds from builder and society is going on since last 2 yrs. Society people are frustrated with it and they are now opposing transfer of our flat into society and they ask us to put pressure on the builder to clear settlements so that we transfer your flat to society.
My question:
It this fair at all?
Are we (buyers) at any kind of fault here?
Why we have to suffer for issues builder has with society and its members?
Is there any law which stops us from getting the flat transferred into society?
Can this be opposed at all?
Isn't it that unsold flat purchased directly from Builder after formation of society becomes part of soc. after paying the charges?
Please provide some advice as the settlement with builder might go on for years or decades to come. Society people are not interested in transferring property as they want builder to clear the dues.
Notes
a: We were provided NOC by the society (No dues certificate) while purchasing the flat.
b: They do not allow us to put the name plate at the entrance of the building.
c: We are 1st buyers of the said flat
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Sound polution by temple mikes
Sirs, There is a vinayak temple very near to my residence. The temple is in the middle of the residential locality. The temple authority starts chanting hymns and recorded songs from morning 4.30 to 11 AM and again from 5 pm to 8.30 PM. This causes nuisance to the residents. There are students carrying studies, infants in the cradles,senior citizens and patientswho need rest. There are people who want to do yoga in a silent and calm atmosphere. The loud speakers are disturbing all categories of people in the locality. But, nobody is dare to restrain the temple authority since there may be opposition led by the temple authority. Unity among people suffering from this malady do not unity and are afraid of getting together to protest the temple authority.
Sirs, Is there any law to restrain the temple authority from using the loud speakers causing disturbance to the people residing in the vicinities of the temple. What action should be taken in this regard?
KIndly guide me.