JEGADEESAN
05 March 2025 at 23:47
Sir
I would like to clarify some doubts regarding Cancellation of Sale Deed which has been Registered based on Forgery POA.
i.e. My Friend's Father namely Sudalai bought some properties through his self earning in 1985 and out of which some properties have been sold by a Land Broker by forgery POA executed by him - (Chidambaram)
Chidambaram(Land Broker) prepared 2 forgery POA in favour of him, like it has been executed by Sudalai in 1996 ( out of the two one prepared with Sudalai Sign ( Chidambaram has referred Sudalai sign from his previous deed and put like that) another one with some one LTI)
Thereafter Chidambaram sold the property in 1996 to some others, based on that forgery POA.
Now Sudalai also no more and leaving behind him 2 sons and 4 daughters and his legal heirs want to cancel the sale deed.Hence you are requested to kindly guide.
I have actual Signature and LTI of Sudalai (Since he has bought some property & sold a property in 1987 with his original sign and LTI )
So I have an option to compare the sign & LTI available in proper document & forgery document .
By the mean time ,I hope that civil court only have the jurisdiction to do so .
Hence you are requested to kindly guide me whether should I file case to cancel the sale deed or POA ?
If I cancel the POA or prove the POA is invalid one, then automatically the subsequent document what has been executed based on POA will become null & Void? or Should I file separate case to cancel the sale deed?
Whether any one of the legal heirs can file the case or all should sign in the petition ?
kishore kumar
27 February 2025 at 18:02
As per the Notary Act or rules in India, it is mandatory for a Notary to keep the records of notarized documents and registers etc. of the last how many years safe?
Thank you.
Anonymous
27 February 2025 at 01:48
I was making a U-turn in my car on the road when an electric scooter without a number plate suddenly braked and slipped. The rider, a 45-year-old man, and his 12-year-old son fell and came under my car. I immediately applied the brakes. The scooter was completely damaged, and the man suffered a leg fracture, while his son sustained minor scratches. However, the scooter did not collide with my car, and there was no damage or scratch on my vehicle.
I took them to AIIMS hospital in an emergency and informed their family. Two days after the accident, I submitted an application at the police station, but they did not provide a receipt. The injured man sought compensation through a third-party insurance claim. After 20 days, the police registered an FIR against me under Sections 281 and 125(a). I then went to the police station, obtained bail, and my car was seized. Later, I secured the release of my car through the court.
I later learned that the same person had a similar accident with a Bolero car a month before my incident, during which he also sustained leg fractures and other injuries. That time also he file FIR against bolero driver. However, in the FIR filed against me, he falsely claimed fractures in his legs and five broken ribs. It appears that he is trying to take advantage of the situation to obtain a disability certificate for benefits, such as a discount on a home loan, and to claim compensation through third-party insurance.
I am worried because I only helped him by taking him to the hospital and calling his family, but now my goodwill has turned against me. Since I am a government employee, frequent court hearings will be difficult for me to attend, especially if I get transferred. I have already spent ₹10,000 on legal expenses, and he is demanding an unethical amount of ₹4–5 lakh for settlement.
He is unwilling to compromise, and I am unsure about the legal consequences. Will I receive any punishment? Will my insurance company’s lawyer handle the case? Should I file a counter-FIR against him for demanding extra money? Please suggest the best course of action in this legal matter.
Anonymous
26 February 2025 at 08:36
(1) certified copy of deposition recorded by sub Divisional Magistrate under section 145 cr p c is not admissible in civil suit .
(2) certified copy of marked exhibited document in 145 Code of Criminal Procedure is not admissible in civil suit
Anonymous
25 February 2025 at 16:30
Hi
if the GPA owner die and he had done the will to his wife name before death, then is she is legally acceptable.
is the old property owner can show any type of rights in this property.
Jatinder Jindal
23 February 2025 at 13:09
a great concern regarding the construction of a wall by the Indian Railways at a Railway Station, which is adversely impacting numerous local industries in the region.
The construction of this wall, which is being erected in front of several factories located near the railway station, is causing a major disruption. There are around 20-22 factories in this area that rely heavily on transportation via the railway tracks for the smooth functioning of their operations. The tracks serve as a vital link for the transportation of raw materials and finished goods. The proposed wall is obstructing the easy access to the railway network, which is essential for the continuation of these industrial activities.
how can we stop it as it will destroy our business
RAMASAMY RAJENDRAN
19 February 2025 at 23:04
Since September-2024, the case is adjourned 5 times with IA/EA, CMP/CMA Pending. How much time it will take to give the final verdict.
kunhi marakkar
17 February 2025 at 15:21
In 2002, a summons was issued against me for a cheque bouncing case. Since I could not appear in court, I was given a lawyer, but I was unable to file the case later. Since I was working abroad, I was unable to investigate later. Is that case still valid now? Can the petitioners attach the joint property that I am entitled to before the case is settled? Will the information of such an old case be available online?
Anonymous
15 February 2025 at 19:57
Who should pay the above charges in a gift deed
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Notice not mandetory to judgment debtor
Want detail clarification with some example of proviso of rule22of order21 of cpc