Mathalai
22 November 2016 at 17:23
Whether the acknowledgement of liability issued by principal borrower alone bind the co-borrower?
Jegaraj
22 November 2016 at 17:11
Dear All
Can anyone please provide the model of Petition under Sec 14 of SARFAESI Act to be filed on behalf of a bank before the District Magistrate(District Collector)
Thanks in Advance
Ayan
22 November 2016 at 17:07
What is the process of complain in Bar Council of India? A lawyer filed case in 2009 , still niter giving case number nor NOC nor fighting case .
VIJAI KUMARR GH
22 November 2016 at 16:01
1. land agreement was made in 1974 and it fulfil in 1994 is it valid agreement or not
2. the same above was in spite of registration they made name change at Revenue Divisional Office through "namuna 13 (B)"certificate is it valid or not
Gopi Sathiyarajan
22 November 2016 at 15:15
Dear sir,
1. Whether the abolition and conversion into Ryotwari Land under section.11 r.w.sec.8(1) of Minor inam abolition Act 1963 of Enfranchised service Inam lands given to Village Officers ( Maniyam, Karnam, Thalayari, Thotti) is quit proper or Not?
2. Patta Issued to the persons, who were in possession and who were not the village officers, under section.11 r.w.sec.8(1) of Minor inam abolition and conversion into Ryotwari Land Act 1963 to the Enfranchised service Inam lands given to Village Officers ( Maniyam, Karnam, Thalayari, Thotti) is quit proper or Not?
3. According to the Rule.19 of Minor inams abolition and conversion into Ryotwari) Rules 1965, the enquiry Under Sec. 21 of Minor inams abolition and conversion into Ryotwari) Act 1963, on the Abolition and conversion into Ryotwari of Enfranchised service Inam lands given to Village Officers ( Maniyam, Karnam, Thalayari, Thotti) should made by the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer. But without any enquiry of RDO, Patta issued under section.11 r.w.sec.8(1) of Minor inam abolition Act 1963 by the settlement Tahsildhar to the persons, who are in possession and were not the village Officers is quit proper or not?
4.If Patta issued on the enfranchised service Inam lands under section.11 r.w.sec.8(1) of Minor inam abolition Act 1963 by the settlement Tahsildhar to the persons, who were in possession and were not the village Officers is not proper, Whether it can be challenge the above orde of Settlement Tahsildhar in 1967.
rathod murtza
21 November 2016 at 19:09
There was given judgement on land dispute matters.but in the judgement it was not use any legal document as evidence only mention pavati of land issued by Area development Authority which base judge decided judgement. And in judgement it was used some cross examination questions which was actually not asked by opposite advocate before court and it was not mentioned this question in certified copy of statement of plaintiff before court. This judgement was given without mentioned proper registered documents. We have appeal before district Court ,I am plaintiffs. So what is stand against this judgement. Is it any way to prove this judgement with mistake or anything other solution?
ASHWANI GAGNEJA
21 November 2016 at 15:20
In a recovery suit, the defendant filed Written Statement without Board Resolution.
Both my lawyer & Judge ignored it. Now the case is in arguments stage.
1. Can we raise the issue now.
2. Will the bar of limitation will have no effect on the suit, as written statement is faulty.
Thanks
Plintiff
Krishna
21 November 2016 at 09:19
In the year 1975 my grandfather executed registered WILL of his self acquired properties bequeathing 1/3 rd share to his elder son, 1/3rd share to his younger son and remaining 1/3rd share to his legally wedded second wife (after death of 1st wife) without any description of the properties with metes and bounds and moreover 2nd wife (beneficiary of the WILL) being an attestor in that WILL.
Here my doubt is can i challenge the WILL by taking plea that beneficiary of the WILL being an attestor raising doubt that WILL executed by testator by coercion and fraud?
There was no description of properties with metes and bounds but whereas after death of testator his 2nd wife alienated some properties as her own wish by specifically mentioning that the said properties is an intestate succession, can this point favour me?
Finally can this WILL be void under law?
MahendraKumar.H.Trivedi
20 November 2016 at 16:29
Respected esteemed experts
family had bought a small property in the name of a schizophrenic brother years back . That time he was in some Sense to sign before registrar. There was no malafide intention.
Property as per family arrangements have been given to me since I am looking after him.
Now after years due to aggravation of mental health disease he has lost his senses.
We do not have his photo ID.
We have his birth certificate. Mother is alive and stays with me.
Could you please guide how we can his photo ID or adharcard can be had?
Whom should we approach,
District collector or Court and how
Regards
Mahendra Trivedi
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Procedure for fighting a case in person in high court
A misc. revision petition is filed in Uttarakhand High Court against order passed by District court by the opposite party which got admitted. Now I am respondent in the said RP and I want to fight the same myself in person. What will be the procedure of the same? I am living in a different city so can I visit High Court on the date of hearing or shall I visit their earlier also for the proceedings of completing the procedure of fighting case in person.