PEACE KAMAL
18 March 2017 at 22:57
We got injuction on property and filed suit for cancellation of mutation. Case at initial stage.we have reached compromise and opposite party is ready to execute regd deed in our favour. As result of which dispute will be over. Since we as well as opposite parties are agreeable. Registered deed can be executed without formal cancelation of injuction order .or we r to get injuction cancelled first then arrange for exelution of registration deed
inderjeet
18 March 2017 at 22:29
I and my family was harassed, humiliated and distress caused by the management who were appointed by head patron of society. In court can I challenge that head patron is answerable and cause of action arose from those persons/management who were appointed by head patron.
PEACE KAMAL
18 March 2017 at 22:28
We had filed suit for recovery of rs13lac.Suit is in initial stage.we paidrs 35000as court fee on the suit. now we have compromised and suit is being withdrawn. Can refund of court fee can be claimed or not
PEACE KAMAL
18 March 2017 at 22:19
We have filled civil suit in respect of property dispute.other party also filed suit against us.suit is in initial stage.Now we have reached compromise with the intervention of friends and intend to withdraw respective suit.what procedure we should follow
M Rajendra
18 March 2017 at 18:11
We have lost a case in 2015 IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE JUNIOR DIVISION.
Court Order : Suit hereby Decreed.
We have made appeal in District court for same. I just want to know up to which court we can make appeal against this decision?
I mean to say if District court also keep junior court decision as it is, Can we apply in High Court or Supreme Court further? Please reply to my query
Dipanwita J
18 March 2017 at 13:43
Hello,
I would like to know what are our options for the below matter.
Adjacent to our apartment compound wall, a factory has come up which is building iron frames and grills. It started small as a storehouse but now it has become big factory with many workers and different kinds of jobs. From 6:30 a.m to 6:30 pm in the day, they cut and polish iron with machines and also keep beating metals as part of their job. The noise is intolerable. It is unbearable not only to the old, ill and very young but also to strong healthy adults.
The owner of the factory is a real estate person, who owns many land plots and has built many apartments in the area. Our apartment was in fact built and sold to us by him.
Under such circumstances, what options do we have?
Please advise.
Ravi Krishna
18 March 2017 at 02:35
When the title of the plaintiff was in dispute with respect to ancestral property before additional senior civil judge court, The Witness on behalf of Plaintiff, Deposed before the court and admitted that he issued House tax & Property tax receipts and the signature mentioned in that receipts belonged to him. Plaintiff got the suit decreed in his favour proving the posssession against Defendants of that suit. After Some period, Another suit was filed by plaintiff for declaration of title over the same schedule property when property was sold by some other parties under fraudulent sale deed. The issue is Plaintiff produced property tax receipts once again before the same court in the current suit against the existing defendants(these defendants are not parties of earlier suit)saying that he paid property taxes over suit property and produced Deposition of Witness pertaining to earlier suit since the said witness died because of age. Whether said deposition can be marked as exhibit to prove the possession over the property and to substantiate the property tax receipts. Because property tax receipts have to be confirmed by the witness in the court. If So under what section of Evidence Act, Deposition of witness can be Marked as exhibit.Now court objects the deposition to be marked as exhibit saying that parties in the current suit are different even though issue is one and same with respect to title & possession . Please Advise
Narayan
17 March 2017 at 22:13
Am narayanan and reside in my own house since 50 years in a village. Am interested in nature and growing trees my adjuscent house owner is my relative. Now the adjucent house is occupied by a tenant for rent since two years. Trees in my gardens are twenty year old. Now the tenant lodge a police complaint for remove the tree because of leaves fell down in his boundry and some branches of tree are in tenants boundry. Enquiry has been done by police with me and house owner. I refused to remove three and a single branch of my tree as the adjucent house owner extented suporrt for me to grow tree and no little bothered about the complaint. Also he give a written statement in police station that the tenant can vacate the house if he feel diacomfort about my house tree. Now It seems that the tenant may approch court. Please advice me come out of this issue and save my tree.
Kvijay12345
17 March 2017 at 21:01
My friend had taken a Home Loan from private bank in 2008. But the bank did not disburse the full sanctioned limit of the loan despite of the several follow ups by the borrower and also the bank did not give any clarification on that front. However the bank charged the EMI, Processing charges etc. on full sanctioned amount of the loan. In fact all the documents including the loan agreement and the loan promisory note inside the agreement were filled in for the full sanctioned amount of the loan despite of the fact that the full sanctioned amount of the loan was never disbursed to the borrower. After one year when the bank still did not disburse the remaining amount of the sanctioned loan the borrower defaulted on that home loan by notifying the bank. Then the notice under SARFAESI act was sent to the borrower which was duly replied by him. He replied that since the full and final sanctioned amount of the loan is not disbursed and the EMI is charged on the full sanctioned amount of the loan, the loan agreement had become null and void due to which bank can not enjoy the benefits of secured creditor. Since then nothing happened till today. I have heard that it is mandatory for the banks to release the full agreement value, otherwise that loan agreement is void and can be termed as breach of the contract.
Recently when the borrower got his CIBIL report it was mentioned that this loan is reported as “Suit Filed and Written off ” by the bank. What does this mean? What legal remedies are available for the borrower to sue the bank ? Is the loan agreement legal? What can the bank do now to recover its loan? What legal measures can the borrower take against the bank?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
injection order
Can we get a injection order for civil cases .for our ancestors properties. For our land which we filled a case 5yrs back