Satish
22 March 2018 at 02:08
My father is blind by birth, he has One brother. On my father we have land of 2.13 acres of agriculture land in Andhra Pradesh. On 2015 september there was sale deed transaction done to three other People with the amount of 24 Lakhs rupees. It was done through My fathers brother with out knowing me. The amount was not given to my father through any bank transaction, It was transferred to my fathers brother account. I get to know recently, I want to get back my fathers land back. Please help me in this regarding.
Udit
21 March 2018 at 23:53
Under which article/provision of law can an application be filed in the high court for demanding compensation against a central govt department for wrongful issuance of a license to some people and on the basis of the license I acted and sufferred loss and later came to know that due to ignorance of the department the license was wrongly issued to fraud people.
Kumari Cheenu
21 March 2018 at 18:02
I am DH. JD has already been served notice of Execution Petition in 2017 and appeared also but only once.
On last date, JD was absent and perhaps ADJ could not see that JD has already been served the notice hence ADJ ordered me to file PF again. I appear in person, do not know much, I was expecting that ADJ is ordering warrant for possession against JD or something like that. But when I found that ADJ has ordered me to file PF, I got confused.
There-after I Googled and found that section 152 CPC can be used for getting the Court Order rectified.
The question to the Ld. Experts is, should I file the PF again or should I file an application u/s 152 CPC to get the last Order rectified/changed?
What are the plus and minus points of both of these options and which one is better?
Anonymous
21 March 2018 at 16:50
Mr.A has purchased an agricultural land from Mr. B and later A has sold this land to Mr. C.After completing all formalities, Mr.C converted this agri land and established his industry there. Now legal heirs of Mr.B have filed a civil suit stating that land being joint property and they were minors at the time of sale and Mr.B could have sold only his share.They requested the court to issue an injection to Mr.C, not to dispose of the property till the disposal of the case, which the court granted ex-parte.Mr.C has informed the court that he will abide by court's injection.Now they have requested for another injection to restrain Mr. C from carrying his business( industry ).which is before the court now.Can the court allow this? Is this not the infringement of the constitutional right of carrying his business legally?
Vijayaraghavan
21 March 2018 at 14:39
Respected sir , whether writ of mandamus can be filed to implement a consent order, then if the order was in force ,I pray the order should be followed strictly and fully. Experts may advice to this with case laws...
Thanking you .
Advocate Anil KumarJayswal
21 March 2018 at 00:41
कृपया कोई न्याय निर्णयन बताये air या sc या allahabad hc का जिससे ये साबित किया जा सके की 1# मामला यदि 18 साल पुराना है तो न्यू एविडेंस appellate stage पर नही मान्य होगा 2# यदि पत्रावली पर पर्याप्त साक्ष्य मौजूद हो और स्वयं प्रतिवादी यानि की अपीलार्थी ने भी मौखिक साक्ष्य द्वारा लोअर कोर्ट में एडमिशन किया हो और अब उसके विपरीत साक्ष्य या दस्तावेज अपीलीय न्यायालय के समक्ष प्रस्तुत करे तो उसके द्वारा दिए गए ऐसे किसी भी दस्तावेज को न्यायालय अस्वीकार कर सकती है 3# आदेश 41 नियम 27 से सम्बंधित नजीर सादर प्रणाम
Anonymous
20 March 2018 at 22:44
My parents have a dispute with neighbours who have made an unauthorized ramp to connect their house to a govt funded road built on our land(,without NOC) and that illegal ramp is also through our land.will the court give weightage to landowner ship or right of way to public as these neighbours are of a privileged class under SC/St quota.they are misleading the district auth.On what ground will the court base the merit of case in the instance that we go for a civil suit to reclaim our land and permission to boundary it to safeguard against neighbours encroachment.?
Anonymous
20 March 2018 at 17:07
Is Assignment of Receivables to any individual by any business to get Invoice Financing facility of few lacs in Mumbai is ligitimate and out of the perview of Money Lending Act
Hari Singh
20 March 2018 at 13:58
dear sir madam I want to mention that am government servant posted as a teacher in Delhi Govt. and I was directed by the court to pay the decretal amount in a civil suit .of which the same is being deducted from my salary.
due to the fact that the money decree is being taken from me on forged and fabricated documents .of which I have also registered an FIR against the opposite party, under such circumstances I do not want my salary to be executed and want a stay for the same my question to you all is that how that stay could be achieved when the RFA in the high court is dismissed as early as possible.
1. that what should I do for immediate stay order?
2.that my advocate has filed an SLP in the apex court but the hearing is to take place, I want to know what matter should we include in the same to get the stay order as early as possible?
3. that the opposite party also do not have any money lending license?
4. that the income tax act 269-SS is also being implicated!
5. that at last, i want to know that what main points we should add in order to get execution stayed as it is important?
6. is SLP in the apex court will prove to be beneficial and any other remedy regarding the case may be suggested?
7. please answer my query as it is very very urgent as early as possible?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
I have been denied justice in the case said in message
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
SECOND APPEAL NO.1 of 2017.
I NEED SUPPORT TO HANDLE ABOVE CASE IN SUPREME COURT FOR THE JUSTICE DENIED BY HC.