srinivasan
06 July 2009 at 19:42
Dear sir, DISTINCTION BETWEEN JOINTFAMILY BUSINESS AND PARTNERSHIP BUSINESS
kalyani choudhury
06 July 2009 at 18:27
I have changed my counsel. Now my previous lawyer is delaying returning my files making some or the other excuse. Presently he says he is going out of town. My court dates are close and my new counsel is unable to study the papers. The old counsel is not attending the phone calls however he has emailed me & said when he is back he will give back my files after taking a 'NO Dues ' from me.
All payments are clear from my side.
Why does he want a No DUES form Me. & When should I get him to sign the NOC's in the Vakalatnamas ? Can he refuse to sign them ? If so Why ? Please Help.
amit jain
06 July 2009 at 17:50
I have given resignation from my company & company agreed to pay me two months notice period but they paid only one month. When I am asking them to pay me, they declined and they told me that i was terminated due to falst statmenet and playing politics. I have everything in writing which clearly demonstrate that I have given resignation & I was very good employee. All such type of email communication was between me and my ex boss. Same person told me that he will give me good refernce for my work in email and now he is telling i was terminated. He also communicated to the team at the time of resignation that I have given resignation because of personal reason. Now tell me what type of remedy available to me. Thanks in advance
Chandra sekhar
06 July 2009 at 12:19
Dear All
We have paid total due amount to the Bank as per RBI one time settlement guidelines and also Bank has collected its legal expenses from us though RBI Guide lines do not allow such thing. We have obtained full and final settlement and No due certificate from the Bank on 30/04/2003.
Our valuable property was pledged as security with the bank. Till today the Bank has not returned the original documents to us thought we have met them several times and also written several registered letters to the Bank and its DGM Office.
In Oct 2008 we have filed a compliant with the banking Ombudsman and now the bank says they will procure certified copies of the documents and give us since the Court has destroyed the original documents in Feb 2008 and they have a docket order from the court to that affect.
Please advise us the next course of action to be taken up on the Bank including filing of Criminal Case and as well as claiming compensation etc. Also let me know the procedure followed by the court while destroying the documents.
Please quote some use full judgments and useful reference books on this issue.
Regards
Dr. S________
05 July 2009 at 21:16
I am a British citizen of Indian origin. I went into an agreement to sell my family house in Delhi and received token money/biyana. I asked my relative “A” to act as my agent to find my house in Noida, which he dealt with the help of his friend and property dealer “B”. On asking for his commission, he said it would be a “cup of tea”.
In August 2008, I agreed to buy a property in Noida, through A and B, and verbally agreed the price “X” and biyana in the sum of “Y”. I left for the UK on the same day. The next day, A and B sent 2 men to get the cash Y from my brother who rang A who confirmed to give the sum Y and promised to send the written agreement the next day. My brother followed these instructions. The deal was to complete on 30 Oct 2008.
I kept asking A to give the written agreement to me but he always postponed on some pretence, until recently. Following this, due to the credit crunch, my buyer could not come up with remaining consideration to complete the deal. As a result, I am also unable to complete the deal on the property in Noida.
I was still trying to get a written agreement from A at this time. He said that this agreement is in “safe keeping” with his friend B and that if I insisted on getting this he would not help me in this matter any more.
Later, A said that I had to pay at least 4 times Y to get the written agreement. He also said that he had to pay several Lacs from his pocket to get the extension done in order to complete the deal. With much agro, he gave me a photocopy of the agreement in which the property was not bought in my name but in the name of B (property dealer). I was never told about this. Also, the purchase price on the agreement was almost 30 Lacs less than agreed with me (30 Lacs less than X). The token money, however, was 51,000 Rs more than agreed (51,000 Rs more than Y).
I feel that A and B have been co-conspirators in cheating and defrauding me. I live in the UK. What should I do?
Manish Raghav
05 July 2009 at 17:04
what is the procedure to get the date of birth changed in the passport. can any one provide me with the template which has to be filed to do so.
ASHWANI GAGNEJA
05 July 2009 at 15:34
DEAR SIRS
WE HAVE FILED A RECOVERY SUITE AGAINST A PRIVATE LTD. CO. IN TIS HAZARI COURT. OUR FIRM WAS REGISTERED WITH REGISTRAR OF FIRMS IN MAY 1994. EITHER BY OUR OR SUB REGISTRAR'S MISTAKE, THE NAME WAS MENTIONED IN THE REGISTRATION AS AVS INDUSTRIES INSTEAD OF AVS SILVERPLATE. IF, WE GET THE AMENDMENT FROM REGISTRAR'S OFFICE NOW, PLEASE LET US KNOW WHETHER THE AMENDMEND BE EFFECTIVE FROM THE DATE OF REGISTRATION OR THE CURRENT DATE BEFORE COURT OF LAW.
CAN YOU PLEASE ADVISE ME OF ANY RUILING BY ANY HIGH OR SUPREME COURT.
ALSO, PLEASE SUGGEST US A COMETANT LAYWER ON THIS MATTER. LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR EARLY REPLY.
THANKS & BEST REGARDS
ASHWANI GAGNEJA
Dr. S________
05 July 2009 at 02:35
I am a British citizen of Indian origin. I went into an agreement to sell my family house in Delhi and received token money/biyana. I asked my relative “A” to act as my agent to find my house in Noida, which he dealt with the help of his friend and property dealer “B”. On asking for his commission, he said it would be a “cup of tea”.
In August 2008, I agreed to buy a property in Noida, through A and B, and verbally agreed the price “X” and biyana in the sum of “Y”. I left for the UK on the same day. The next day, A and B sent 2 men to get the cash Y from my brother who rang A who confirmed to give the sum Y and promised to send the written agreement the next day. My brother followed these instructions. The deal was to complete on 30 Oct 2008.
I kept asking A to give the written agreement to me but he always postponed on some pretence, until recently. Following this, due to the credit crunch, my buyer could not come up with remaining consideration to complete the deal. As a result, I am also unable to complete the deal on the property in Noida.
I was still trying to get a written agreement from A at this time. He said that this agreement is in “safe keeping” with his friend B and that if I insisted on getting this he would not help me in this matter any more.
Later, A said that I had to pay at least 4 times Y to get the written agreement. He also said that he had to pay several Lacs from his pocket to get the extension done in order to complete the deal. With much agro, he gave me a photocopy of the agreement in which the property was not bought in my name but in the name of B (property dealer). I was never told about this. Also, the purchase price on the agreement was almost 30 Lacs less than agreed with me (30 Lacs less than X). The token money, however, was 51,000 Rs more than agreed (51,000 Rs more than Y).
I feel that A and B have been co-conspirators in cheating and defrauding me. I live in the UK. What should I do?
srinivasan
04 July 2009 at 16:44
under infermation act, can we get infermation regarding partnership business accounts in which iam the leagle hirer of the diesesed partner.How shoud we apply .kindly guid me sir.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
contract
i lodged complain regarding the cancel of the transacation of the flat due to rejection of loan due to not perform the sale agreement by the opponent i joined the two parties 1] from where the representative who collected the cheques from me 2] and another main office [head office ] having the name x developers now opponet lawyer came with the application to delete the no- 1 who is not a party because he is only employee of the head office and the other office is created ant the local location having kept name x precious
have any judgment not to delete the person who has done work on behalf of the head office which is appointed by the company ples discuss the said matter thanks to all experts