Anonymous
01 November 2009 at 13:41
hello evyone here
plz first tell me where is consumer court in delhi and close to south delhi.
right now iam practising in criminal cases but i want to specilise in consumer cases . how and where shd i approch the advocates for my practise.
shibunabeel
01 November 2009 at 13:25
whether easement right can be clamed over acquired property?
whether an application u/order 39 rul 1 regarding the disturbence of easment is maintanable before the reference court?
Anonymous
01 November 2009 at 01:07
Dear Sir,
We bought an agri land from X who had power of atterny from Y.While we register the land Y was expired and we had been hidden by X and we are not aware at that time.All documents are very clear in our name ie patta passbook land tax receipt and Electricity name transfer etc.
Now the issue is nuisance of neighbour Z.As the Z is making nuisance to us we approached Session court and got an Injuction order to use the land upto the final judgement of this case.
Could any one advise please on this power of atterny issue.
But the Z party's full time bussiness is encroaching other's land and cheating only.He is using nearky 10 acres but he has haly acres only in his name.Because of village peoples iliterate, continously he is doing this problems on the innocent village people.
We appreciate and thanks the advise.
Thanks with Regards,
Maharajan.S
Tuticorin.
Tamil nadu.
Mobile-9150081758 /9043556500
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
31 October 2009 at 23:02
Have you an idea about
What is Doctrine of Relation BacK ?
yogesh
31 October 2009 at 20:15
Can you please locate the exact citation of the following judgment in pretext to S.L.J
D.S.MEENA Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS
W.P(C) No 3779/2006
Date of Judgement: 07/12/2006
Regards
Y.C.Pandya
31 October 2009 at 14:44
Sometimes rulemaking powers under certain Acts are given to certain authorities ,boards, committees or government at large. These rules provide certain procedures or modalities or forms chiefly destined for the purpose of carrying out the aim of the legislation.
Now the problem is how far can the authority go in to legislating further on certain points?
Sometimes the government inspired by popularity motive or for the popular weal makes some scheme and issues GOVERNMENT RESOLUTIONS(shortly G.R.). Under these G.R. certain rules or provisions of Acts tend to be controverted. How far are these Government Resolutions or notifications hold good in point of law?
In short delegated legislation in general create a kind of dilemma which sometimes seemingly good play havoc with the rules or provisions of the Act. So what kind of criteria limitation can be attached on such delegated legislation and can I have a detailed explanation on these points in any referable book of any author of India or any other country?
madhurMehta
31 October 2009 at 14:37
Sometimes rulemaking powers under certain Acts are given to certain authorities ,boards, committees or government at large. These rules provide certain procedures or modalities or forms chiefly destined for the purpose of carrying out the aim of the legislation.
Now the problem is how far can the authority go in to legislating further on certain points?
Sometimes the government inspired by popularity motive or for the popular weal makes some scheme and issues GOVERNMENT RESOLUTIONS(shortly G.R.). Under these G.R. certain rules or provisions of Acts tend to be controverted. How far are these Government Resolutions or notifications hold good in point of law?
In short delegated legislation in general create a kind of dilemma which sometimes seemingly good play havoc with the rules or provisions of the Act. So what kind of criteria limitation can be attached on such delegated legislation and can I have a detailed explanation on these points in any referable book of any author of India or any other country?
dkshankar
31 October 2009 at 07:34
Dear experts,
i need your valuable suggestions on this matters. The facts are as follows:-
A land owner and a builder enter into an agreement to develop a flats in a site. The land owners entered into an agreement with the builder and the land owner is to get 60% of the constructed portion and the builder is to get 40 % of constructed portion. Then after construction some 400 sq ft of constructed portion has to allotted to land owners but it could not be separated with a flat and hence both parties entered into an agreement and the builder has given an affidavit stating that a sum of Rs. 5,15,000/- has to be paid by the builder to the land lords. The affidavit duly executed on a Rs.20/- N.J.Stamp papers and signed before an Notary Public. Later disputes arose and one of the land owner filed a consumer case against the builder. But the builder was set exparte and exparte order passed since no counter was filed. Now he filed an Appeal before state commission. In the mean time there is a delay of 400 days in filing the appeal and 258 days delay in representing the appeal. The important points is that the property as developed to sell the same to third party hence it is for commercial purpose. One of the party has not signed and he is not a party in the Complaint hence mis-joinder of party.
My quarry is that whether this case can be tried at Consumer Court since the complainant is not a consumer and there is no deficency in service. Is there is any rulings available in this regards?
thanks in advance
Yours
DK Shankar
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
31 October 2009 at 02:32
What is Doctor of Relation BacK ?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Title suit
Respected experts,
I filed a Title suit against a person constantly claiming my land situated adjacent to him. We do not live there. In the w/s he disclosed that by the deed he is claiming belongs to my diseased father who is having three sons and four daughters, who too are necessary party, and the suit is bad for non -joinder of necessary parties and disclosed their names also. Now judgment passed in my favor, goes like this “Suit is and the same be decreed in favor of plaintiff against contesting defendants and against ex-parte decree against uncontested defendant.” No appeal has been filed, and 6 months has been passed Later we came to know the claiming had got this land in his family partition. Now my concern is that, can the ex-parte defendants (who are living adjacent to the land in suit and is having full knowledge of the suit) bring any fresh suit? Can a person join any suit suo- motto, if the property in question is related to him, and he is having the full knowledge about the suit? What is the limitation in recalling the ex-parte in this case? Thanks to all.