Soma
24 November 2009 at 00:00
Judgment of a consumer case was passed on 28.08.2008.
OP did not comply with that.
Now execution case filed..
In fact I found that no consumer case actually lies against them. It is a simple case of sale of land. one agrees to sale 2 decimle land to other and enters into and simple AGREEMENT FOR SALE.. However the complainant(purchaser) managed to get a judgment against the seller.
It is a simple case of transfer of property over which CDF has no jurisdiction.
However no appeal was preffered...Now execution case filed..
What remedy I have?
Revision petition in State Forum possible?
WRIT against the judgment possible?
Objection as to jurisdiction in the execution case itself lies?
Any other remedy?
Anish goyal
23 November 2009 at 20:31
Whether section 87 of ipc can act as am exception to section 494 of IPC
Anish goyal
23 November 2009 at 20:29
There is a judgement by supreme court on the point that power to transfer the civil case 4m one state to other state is only with supreme court. Section 23(3) has been made redundant by 1976 amendment. Can any expert provide of the citation 4 that judgement. Thanks
Rima
23 November 2009 at 16:30
Can any respected lawyer provide me a sample PUT UP PETITION ?
Anonymous
23 November 2009 at 14:17
sir,
I had purchased a land through registered document on 1-10-1991 from land owner
on 10-10-1990 another person applied for court decree for said land and he got it on 31-10-1991 which document is valid one, he has mutated by ror act on 6-7-1998
on site we are the occupants but on records his name entered from 1998 what can i do now
he is telling that land is his only
Advocate.S.A.Siddiq
22 November 2009 at 18:24
Dear Sir
kindly show garnishee order passing by Civil Court or Magistrate.
Debashis Mandal
22 November 2009 at 15:47
Respected Experts,
I have a question to ask - for last 40 years we reside in a rented house, which was initially taken on rent by my late grandfather, my grandfather had 5 sons, out of which my father was elder son, becomes no more & me & my mother residing in that house, my another uncle is also residing separately in that house with his family & another uncle is not residing into that house but keeping his possession in one room by keeping the room under lock & key, & rest of 2 uncles are not having any possession into that house & also they r not residing into that house.
After my grandfathers death our present landlady is now issuing rent bill of the house by mentioning 6 names in the place of my grandfather, they r my mother, my name & my other 4 uncles names. But in reality the rent is being paid by only we (me & my mother), my uncle who is residing in that house & the uncle who is keeping his possession in a room. Other 2 uncles r not paying any amount as they r not residing in that house.
Now the problem is my uncle who is residing with us into the said house, wants to have that room which is under lock & key for his use, but my uncle who is keeping his possession into that room is unwilling to give it.
Now the question is –
1. Now my uncle who is keeping the room under lock & key can he do it legally? As no specific space is not mentioned into the rent bill.
2. If my uncle who residing into that house will break up the lock & without any notice to the possessor uncle take the possession of the said room, as because my that uncle who is keeping his possession into that room is not residing into that house, then on presumptive basis can that uncle take any previous legal safeguard?
3. Finally, if such odd thing is happened, then what legal steps my uncle (who is keeping the room under lock & key) can take? If he has not taken any previous safeguards.
4. As we are also residing into the said house, can any legal problem may come to us if such things happened?
Pls. suggest me the appropriate action.
Thanks,
Debashis
raghavan
22 November 2009 at 00:49
sir,
i want to know whether Right to Information Act is applicable on Cooperative societies. whether they are bound to give information on a particular aspect. some say byelaws, annual reports could not be disclosed.if not what informations could not be disclosed by them
warm regards
raghavan
Debashis Mandal
21 November 2009 at 16:45
Respected Experts,
I have a question to ask - for last 40 years we reside in a rented house, which was initially taken on rent by my late grandfather, my grandfather had 5 sons, out of which my father was elder son, becomes no more & me & my mother residing in that house, my another uncle is also residing separately in that house with his family & another uncle is not residing into that house but keeping his possession in one room by keeping the room under lock & key, & rest of 2 uncles are not having any possession into that house & also they r not residing into that house.
After my grandfathers death our present landlady is now issuing rent bill of the house by mentioning 6 names in the place of my grandfather, they r my mother, my name & my other 4 uncles names. But in reality the rent is being paid by only we (me & my mother), my uncle who is residing in that house & the uncle who is keeping his possession in a room. Other 2 uncles r not paying any amount as they r not residing in that house.
Now my question is –
a. Is there any legal provision by which the landlord can include 6 names in a single rent bill?
b. The above mentioned 6 persons – are now collectively becomes tenant or individually becomes tenant? When any specific space for any person is not mentioned or defined into the rent bill.
c. When out of 6 persons 2 persons are not paying any bill amount & also not having any possession into the house, then can we delete or request to the landlord to delete their names from such rent bill? Whether for doing so their previous permission is needed or not?
Pls. send me the suggestions.
Thanks
Debashis
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
cheque
can i claim the amount of cheque from the legal heirs of the drawer of the cheque.
The Drawer of the cheque has died before the maturity date of the cheques.
The cheques were post dated and the date on the cheques is a date after the death of the drawer.
i.e if darwer died in june 2009 the date is of july 2009.
I dont have any document in support of cheques to prove that why they are issued.
moreover please tell me what the drawer legal heirs can do to evade themselves from this liability.