Mohamed Ali
01 January 2010 at 12:21
A Sunni hanafi family partition suit was decreed in 1960 by the Additional court,
our grandmother who is 3rd plaintiff in suit was entitled for 1/17th share as per decree,
She died 26 years after decree in 1986.
She had 1 predeceased son with 3 children’s and 2 daughters’s who survived her.
While filing Final decree petition in the year 1989, the 3 children’s of predeceased son were wrongly brought on record as Legal heir’s of 3rd plaintiff along with her two daughters
Now in the year 2008 daughters have filed an Interlocutory Application under Section 151 of CPC, in front of the trial court to strike out from record those 3 children’s of predeceased son who are not entitle for any share in 3rd plaintiffs share as per Mohameddan law. It is well Known that as per Mohameddan law Orphaned grandchildren are not entitle for any share in grandparent’s property.
Orders on our IA: The Judge has dismissed our IA aying, whether these Orphaned grandchildren entitle for any share in 3rd plaintiffs property cannot be settled in this pending Final decree proceedings as per order 1 rule 8, further saying Final decree proceedings is for only allotment of shares as per decree.
Judge failed to assess that when one is not a legal heir as per law, he cannot be a legal representative he can be strike out from record as Final decree proceedings is a continuation of partition suit.
Question: Our advocate is now filing writ petition in the high court to challenge lower court order,under order 22 rule 5 along with judgements on Mohameddan law for orphaned grandchildren and judgements on competency of final decree court..
Is he proceeding in a right way, is he using correct section of CPC, If any other please suggest. Whether highcourt gives dirction to trial court to strike LR’s wrongly added ?
Order 22 Rule 5. Determination of question as to legal representative.
Where a question arises as to whether any person is or is not the legal representative of a deceased plaintiff or a deceased defendant, such question shall be determined by the Court:
1[Provided that where such question arises before an Appellate Court, that Court may, before determining the question, direct any subordinate Court to try the question and to return the records together with evidence, if any, recorded at such trial, its findings and reasons therefor, and the Appellate Court may take the same into consideration in determining the question.]
Anonymous
31 December 2009 at 20:06
Dear Expert Members,
I am law graduate and in person contesting my case of service matter but due to certain unavoidable circumstances(CRITICAL ILLNESS)of my parent I will not in position to contest my case which will ready for final disposal in the Hon'ble Tribunal
I want to seek the adjourment of my case for next hearing
Please inform in what way I can seek the adjournment
Whether I have to file the M.A ?
or written communication to the Respondents/Pleader for adjournment?
Or intimation to the Registrar for adjournment
Please inform as I will not be in postion to send any representative on that date
Anish goyal
31 December 2009 at 18:29
It is general rule that order II R2 does not apply to the execution proceedings. My question is that if the decree holder applies for the one relief only in execution or if claims only a part of total decree,
1)whether his such part application for execution is valid?or
2) only 2nd application for rest of claim is not allowable?
3) both the applications of execution will go irrespective of splitting?
Please cite the case. Thanks
george
31 December 2009 at 17:52
sir,
We failed to pay tax to the state revenue deptt.on a large extent of land .the land was taken by the govt as unclaimed land. Now can we claim the land back and claim for patta.please advice
Anonymous
31 December 2009 at 15:21
Respected Experts,
I am in need of Apex Court findings as against (1) Section 5-A of A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act,1971 and (2) Rule 27 (4) of A.P.ROR Rules, 1989.
Pls.provide me if possible.
Thanks.
sushil bhatt
31 December 2009 at 11:25
Dear All,
Can anyone pls suggest me any judgement of High court/ Supreme Court in respect of Arbitration matter, wherein section 11(6) is invoked without complying the clauses pertaining to other mechanism of resolution of disputes before invoking arbitration clause?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
TDS Tax Returns
A person is working in Mnc. His all tax has been deducted from salary by way of Tds. There is no his tax liability upto 31.03.2009.But he did not file return by 31st July,2009. Now he wants to file return. will he pay interest u/s 234 for delayed submission of return.