pratik
15 April 2010 at 14:16
1)Difference between city civil court, Munsiff Court, small causes court & district court.
2)the limits under which the plaintiff or defedants can apply for the appeal.(in short what are the limits to appeal on the abovemetioned various courts.)
Pls explain the abovemetioned with the help of a good examples .
thanking u all experts in advance.
AMITS
15 April 2010 at 13:23
Firsly, My good wishes to all the learned legal brains who are makeing this interactive platform meanigful!(spcly. to mr. makkad, a.v. vishal,rao sir,hatts off to you guys, keep the good wrk . going), I Have a query n seek ur advice on the following issue :-
(1)we are total 9 brother$sisters , our father late. CM died in dec. 1978 and mother smt. JD died prior to him in jan. 1978.
(2)A B C D E F G H I are (9 CHILDREN)
out of which eldest sister of all childre A
died in 1984(cancer). she has 6 children (all alive).
(3)now, due, to some personal dislikeing and jealousy second sister (B)filed a suit in revenue court in 1994
claiming her share 1/9 in ( PROPERTY NO. 1 WHICH WAS) agricultrural land and which was acquired by state houseing board in 1994 although notice for acqusition were served in 1980, but due to stay order, possession was not taken by houseing board,till 1994 agricultural activities were going on. this was self acquired property by mother (JD). and after the death of mother in jan. 1978. all the 5 sisters had given affidavits surrendering their right and stateing no objection in the property in presence of their father, thus on the basis of the affidavits and death certificate for agricultural land mutation was done in favour of 4 brothers.in 1978. we have the dispatch no register no. but unfortunately ,we are not been able to get the certified copies even under RTI acts. provision as we have been told that the authorities are not bound to provide records older then 20 yrs.mutation stll is in 4 brothers name during these 32 yrs.now , in 2007 an agreement between 4 brothers and houseing board was done and 25% land was given in compensation (residential $commercial), now due to devlopments in city the cost of land grew up and went up in crores (approx.50 crores)
now, in 2009 the second sister (B) gave an affidavit duely signed and thumb impression for withdrawl of case in revenue court by changeing her lawyer, on the basis of her affidavit the sub division magistrate, dissmissed the case on basis of affidavit and vakalatnama of the second lawyer. now, the second sister (B) is haveing 5 children , 1 died in 1994(disease), remaining 4 includeing 1 sister,the eldesdest son of her is a practiceing lawyer ,and politician.and was behind all these legal battles going on since 1994, he is supported by his siblings, as a result of withdrawal case he was furious and got very angery as he knew the land costs in crores of rupees,thus she pressurised his mother with help of his 2 brother and 1 sister and made him signed papers for fileing a fresh suit in civil court for dividation ("baabat:-TAKASAMA AIVAM HISSAB FAIMI")
AND SAID THAT the case was withdrawn by fraud in revenue court, also, complained collector and chief secretary of the state about sub division magistrate, collector asked s.d.m. and he responded that decision was given under rules and law. collector was satisfied.now summons of the fresh suit was served to all the sisters and brothers and children of eldest sister who died much earlier. now, all the remaining 3 sisters have relinquished their rights through a registered relinquished deed.and the six children of eldest sister have given an affidavit stateing that they do not want any share,
it cannot be done through registered deed as they are liveing in seperate places, thus affidavit was given on their behalf.now, lawyer of four brother have initially given affidavit on behalf of sisters that all of them signed a affidavit in presence of their father releaseing their rights in property and allowing mutation to be done in favour of their brothers. through this affidavits they also admitted that all the sisters signed affidavit 32yrs back includeing the sister who is now claiming her share .
besides this they also admitted through affidavit that there was a "will' by her mother which was known to all the brothers by 1980 which also states that she wants to give her self earned property to her 4 sons.now the witness to will were two persons one of them died few yrs back and other is son of the eldest sister . also the deed writer is witness and he is alive . but the son of the second sister(B) WHO IS CLAIMING her share wants an temporary injunction so that brother can not dispose off property.
also, it has come to the knowledge of the 4 brothers that he is planning to claim that the will is fake.....! and he has also given an application in the houseing board to not issue'patta' till the case is decided. houseing board has issued only 'provisonal patta' for the land.(given as compensation. what can be done next towards not getting temporary injunction and to stop him from wasteing time in challengeig will, and doing other act. just to add one more thing; houseing board authorities have given many registered notice since 1994 to second sister (B)asking her to present personally and keep her objections but she never turned up
to houseing board office ,as a result board authorities gave her final chance to appear before the board authorities but she again not appeared. and as a result board authorities had dissmissed the application to stop giveing compensation.
actually, the second sister (B) always had
very good relation with all her brothers and sisters but her one son was jealous of her maternal uncles, as a result he forced her to sign her , every time , she is very old lady in her late seventies and can't get up from her bed she would never be wanting to get financial benefits at this point of her life,but her greedy son who is a lawyer as told earlier is misuseing his profession to blackmail us so, that, we could negotiate with him, and for money s sake his brothers and his sister is also supporting him....! kindly help us through your valuble suggestions to make our way through this legal issue. i am son of one of the 4 brothers.
regards
to all the learned lawyers..........!
mahendrakumar
15 April 2010 at 08:54
during the proceedings of a case at the district forum,the counsel to O.P raises that the case is not maintainable at the forum due the judgement of higher forum.
a) is to binding on the O.P counsel to bring the case details like citation and case no etc?
b) or just a mentioning is enough?
S.B.adil rahman
15 April 2010 at 07:19
Kindly tell whether the Office of the Chief Information Commissioner is a criminal court (since it orders imposing the penalty)or tribunal or has the status of a civil court?Section 19 of RTI Act vests the power of a civil court to the Information Commissioners with regard to summoning of the documents and witnesses like that of a civil court but does it make immune to the whole of Information Commission to question its functionings? Does it have the pwoer of contempt? Kindly enlightene me.
Anonymous
14 April 2010 at 23:15
Respected members,
A person ‘A’ sold a land to “X” in 1969. Son of ‘A’ sold the same land to ‘Y’ in 1972. Both ‘X’ and “y” were doing job outside. No one neither ‘X’ nor did ‘Y’ know about the land sold to both. After 30 yrs ‘Y’ started construction on the land. ‘X’ stopped him. Both went in civil suit. After 10 yrs suit decided in favour of ‘X’. Thus ‘Y’ got cheated. In deed of ‘Y’ it is written that if vendee get ejected or in any way dispossessed due to fault in my right/title, me and my legal heir will compensate the loss incurred. In this case what remedy available to ‘Y’ where both 'A' and his son has died. Can ‘Y’ ask compensation from the heirs of son of ‘A’? Plz. Advice.
Thanks and regds.
Dushyant Pandya
14 April 2010 at 18:01
Looking for presentation or material regarding "Career on Contract Management"
KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA
14 April 2010 at 18:01
Whether Hire Purchase Act, 1972 came into existence by way of publication in Official Gazette of the Central Government of India, If so, on which date it was published?
I am need of the above information as I have to argue a case related to Hire Purchase Agreement on 21-4-2010.
Please do the needful,
Advance thanks
KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA
14 April 2010 at 17:58
Whether Hire Purchase Act, 1972 came into existence by way of publication in Official Gazette of the Central Government of India, If so, on which date it was published?
I am need of the above information as I have to argue a case related to Hire Purchase Agreement on 21-4-2010.
Please do the needful,
Advance thanks
Anonymous
14 April 2010 at 16:07
sir i am a young just graduated lawyer.
a client approached me to file a eviction suit against his tenant.
the tenant is supposedly using the house for commercial purpose with out permission.
The rent is presently 10000 per month. He wants to file a case in RC for rents to the tune of 30000 as there are 2 registered and 1 unregistered office running in the rented portion let out for rent.
How do i give a notice and can i file for claiming rent to the tune of 30000. since the day of registering such office illegally.
pl advice. Is there any sites from where i can get a proforma of the petition to be filed.
thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
similar relief on different grounds
is it possible to maintain a second writ petition or original application seeking similar relief on different grounds which were not pleaded before in an earlier writ petition.
can there be any res judicata applied against the relief claimed under article 14 and 16 in a subsequent petition.