Dear Sir
We had filed one recovery suit few years back. After filing of the suit some payment was made. We also filed replication. Now at the time of final arguments the opposite counsel has raised objection that we were required to file amended pleadings stating the new amount outstanding.
Please supply some citation stating that not filing amended pleadings doesnt mean that we the other party is not liable.
Regards
Anonymous
09 September 2010 at 11:15
dear sir ,
i want to change my surname from 10th and 12 (cbse) marksheet . i m from ajmer region.
in marksheet , thakur is written as surname but originally we are chadhar and want to replace with thakur .
how can i change my surname ?
what procedure have to i apply ?
and what documents are required to make the change ?
please sir describe it in detail.
I have received an exparte ad-interim order im my favor directing the defendant to immediately take action to stop leakage from her flat.
She has not taken any preventive measures yet. Can I approach the police with the interim order so as to force her to comply with the orders ?
mahendrakumar
09 September 2010 at 06:33
Inspite of search at various legal sites,I could not locate the full text of state commission judgement (Presumably of Maharastra) in the case "James Longuin D"Souza V/s Principal Rural Medical College"
can anyone provide the full text or any useful weblink to locate the same?
A friend lost his left hand due to pure negligence in a government hospital. He was admitted at 3am, but the operation to re-attach the severed hand, which was to be done within 3 hours, started only when the government doctors strolled in at 10am.
There must be many such pending open unaddressed cases against a govt hospital. Would it help to publish an article in the newspaper, and trying to collate as many such cases, and approaching the court for redressal?
We do not want this to happen to anyone else.
Anonymous
08 September 2010 at 22:22
EXPLAINATION REQUIRED IN RESPECT OF
"DAMNAM SINE INJURIA & INJURIA SINE DAMNAM.
Anonymous
08 September 2010 at 22:19
Can any body explain the meaning of
"PAISUM NON FACTUS".
Anonymous
08 September 2010 at 16:22
DRT verdit in case i found: the bank did not maintain the accounts properly
in the loan account and there is no explanation from
the bank so far as maintaining of the acount is concernred
and it is clear in all the bank cases and the account copy
will fasten the liability but in this case the account copy
itself is incorrect and people will believe the account copy
of the bank and this account copy seems to be totally
incorrect inview of the several pay slips filed
by the defendents which are marked
as EX B13 to EX B18 containing many books.
In these CIRCUMSTANCES THEACCOUNT COPY
CANNOT BE BELIVED AND THEREFORE THE OAhas to be
allowed only for the amount of Rs. 1128685/- with simple interest 6%pa.,
from the date of OA till realisation.
This recovery certificate is being issued
since it is public money and there is no document
to show how much amount acually due to the applicant bank.
The bank never proved the amount due.
It is the intial burden on the bank according to the
Evidence Act Sec 101 to 103 and the intial burden is not
discharged by the bank.
Therefore, the bank cannot base on the demerits
of the defendents case
How the defendents cameout fromthe clutches of bank? They win the case DRAT?
Surprising banks if not prpoerly maintain how the coustmer saved? customer is GOD to the bank, but now no bank feels the same, moreover behaves and using abusing language. NPA became more fraud and it became GOLDMINE to the bank officials
The party submitted the account through an CA and moreover party paid excess of Rs.4 lakhs. The bank manager in his cross accepted that the bank failed to credit some amounts tothe account. The fixed deposits Rs.1.25 lakhs not credited to theaccount and states there is no record. FDRs no."s,amount,dated stated the defendents. Those are pledged tobank. The bank states orginal account book misplaced/not found/lost. Typed a/c copy produced. So many credit vouchers not reflected in the account. So how far DRAT help tothe defendents? possible
Also the bank financed and account inthe name of ALT (ITS name of the building)but the mortaged property inthe name SKT. Suit filed inthe name of ALT. VALID?
JAIME
08 September 2010 at 15:34
After change of Lawyer by opponent can the opponent file objection to joinder of parties before the matter reaches the argument stage?
money suit
"A" borrowed an amount of Rs 1,00,000/-(one laks )only with the rate of interest 10% per month untill the re payment of the credited amount from "B". for the last 18 month "A" is not retuning the money and says that court would not accept the rate of interest(10% per mpnth) so better wasting money in court settle it out side the cout and charge interest rate as per annum. is it correct that the creditor wont get the agreed rate of interest.is there any norm in indian law to regulate the rate of interest in private/personal money borrowing case/matter