HARVINDER SINGH ANAND
30 November 2010 at 17:54
Is the photostate copy of the certified copy of the 'judgement'is admissable as evidence or not?
somnathsingh
30 November 2010 at 17:45
Sir,
A Suit for partition is filed by the sisters against brother demanding the equal share challenging the Will executed by their mother in favour brother only. Prior to that both sisters were given declarations stating that the will is correct and they have no right in the suit property and also taken money under love and affection from their brother. Declarations and the receipts were given by the sisters to brother witnessing their husbands. And thee documents were marked as exhibits.
Advocate “A” is contested for plaintiff (sisters) and Advocate “B” is contested for Defendant in OS (Brother)
Over ruling the above documents the Original Suit was decreed in favour of sisters’ partitioning the suit property in 3 equal shares, keeping the will under suspicious circumstances.
Aggrieved by the partition decree, brother preferred an appeal and it is pending. Now there is good understanding between the sisters and the brother and the sister are willing to confirm the will and the declarations given by them are correct and they have no rights in the suit property.
Is it possible to state in the appellate court by giving affirmation in pleadings what they have denied in the lower court?
Is it possible that Advocate “B” who contested against sisters (Plaintiffs) in OS can file Vakalat in favour of sisters (Respondents) in Appellate court?
What will be the situation of Advocate “B” if the suit is for compromise in between all the parties?
Can the appellate respondent advocate can file these pleadings in the appellate court. Please advice at the earliest.
Regards
Somnath
somnathsingh
30 November 2010 at 16:49
Sir,
A Suit for partition is filed by the sisters against brother demanding the equal share challenging the Will executed by their mother in favour brother only. Prior to that both sisters were given declarations stating that the will is correct and they have no right in the suit property and also taken money under love and affection from their brother. Declarations and the receipts were given by the sisters to brother witnessing their husbands. And thee documents were marked as exhibits.
Over ruling the above documents the Original Suit was decreed in favour of sisters’ partitioning the suit property in 3 equal shares, keeping the will under suspicious circumstances.
Aggrieved by the partition decree, brother preferred an appeal and it is pending. Now there is good understanding between the sisters and the brother and the sister are willing to confirm the will and the declarations given by them are correct and they have no rights in the suit property.
Is it possible to to state in the appellate court by giving affirmation in pleadings what they have denied in the lower court.
Can the appellate respondent advocate can file these pleadings in the appellate court. Please advice at the earliest.
Regards
Somnath
Anonymous
30 November 2010 at 14:33
Dear all experts,
i wish filing a PIL against tamilnadu state transport corp, regarding that, in the local buses inside mentioned and painted that, this side ladies seat, here disable person seat, and aware of thievs, so on so now passangers are not only travel ladies and also travel all men also, but all of the passangers took the bus ticket, but why not mentioned or painted here gents seats, its my query, if i will file a PIL, surely will i get succeesed, kindly give me your valuable answer and what are the procedure my side taken before the filing the suit.
Member (Account Deleted)
29 November 2010 at 22:42
CAN WE REDRAFT ALL THE FACTS OF THE CASE IN SYNOPSIS OF SLP ?
Member (Account Deleted)
29 November 2010 at 22:41
IS IT NECESSARY TO REPRODUCE ALL RECORDS OF HIGH COURT PROCEEDINGS AS TRUE TYPED, WHILE FILING AN SLP?
WHILE FILING SLP, CAN WE FILE AN APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM TRUE TYPING AS IN HIGH COURT ?
Member (Account Deleted)
29 November 2010 at 22:37
WILL IT BE SUFFICIENT TO ANNEX THE COMPLETE RECORD OF HIGH COURT PLEADINGS WITH SLP AS A SIGLE ANNEXURE EXCEPT TO ATTACH ALL ANNEXURES SEPERATELY ?
Anonymous
29 November 2010 at 22:05
I am working on adhoc basis for last 12 years have filed the case against my employer and the petition is pending in the C.A.T Last week my head of office has informed that he had received the communication from the employer that I shall not be permitted to work in the Office as I was not given further adhoc extension. I asked for the copy of the order but I was refused and advised that I should contact the administration of my employer .I send the letter but I received no reply
Before the Hon'ble bench of CAT, I filed the petition in the form of Miscallneous Application pleading to make stay on the verbal directions given to me. But the bench didnot entertained my plea and informed that on verbal directions such order cannot be passed. The counsel of the respondents too admitted that that there was no such order
But in reality there was an order which was not given to me but has been informed verbally and the counsel may not be awre of the recent updates
What remedy should I have to adopt in such circumstances
Anonymous
29 November 2010 at 21:57
Sir,
I have filed the Petition in CAT which was allowed and was remanded back to the CAT for deciding the issue of Limitation
I have submitted that Limitation shall be counted from the date of final order given by respondents as they have not notified the result officially and hence they cannot stand on the plea of Limitation. I supported my version with RTI reply which the Hon'ble bench has taken on records
While the respondents have submitted that they have notified the result but was not availble on records
The Hon'ble C.A.T on hearing the both parties and given time to the respondent to produce the actual notification of result
I am employee wkg there in the organisation knew that they had not notified the result and had kept my candidature in dark .This they had declared in RTI Application which I had received the reply
What happened if they produce any false notification before court? Is there any remedy for that?
Whether there is any Judgments/citations which supports my plea that no notification was there and hence the plea of Limitation cannnot be maintained
Thanking you in anticipation
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Sub: Filing vakalat in favour of parties in Appellate against whom contested against in the opposite
Sir,
A Suit for partition is filed by the sisters against brother and father demanding the 4 equal shares challenging the Will executed by their mother in favour their brother only. The sisters were also stated in plaint that son and father were colluded to grasp the suit property. The said will and (declarations) were denied by the father. Prior to that both sisters were given declarations stating that the will is correct and they have no right in the suit property and also taken money under love and affection from their brother. Declarations and the receipts were given by the sisters to brother witnessing their husbands. And thee documents were marked as exhibits.
Advocate “A” is contested for plaintiff (sisters) and Advocate “B” is contested for Defendant 1 (father) and Advocate “C” for Defendant 2 in OS (Brother)
Over ruling the above documents the Original Suit was decreed in favour of sisters’ partitioning the suit property in 3 equal shares, keeping the will under suspicious circumstances.
Aggrieved by the partition decree, brother preferred an appeal and it is pending. Now there is good understanding between the sisters and the brother and the sister are willing to confirm the will and the declarations given by them are correct and they have no rights in the suit property.
Is it possible to state in the appellate court by giving affirmation in pleadings what they have denied in the lower court?
Is it possible that Advocate “C” who contested against sisters (Plaintiffs) and Defendant 1 (father) in OS can file Vakalat in favour of sisters (Respondents) and Father also in the Appellate court?
What will be the situation of Advocate “C” if the suit is for compromise in between all the parties?
Can the appellate respondent advocate can file these pleadings in the appellate court. Please advice at the earliest.
Regards
Somnath