ankit gupta
01 December 2010 at 16:28
dear readre
please tell me
the application of consumer protection act 1986 with insurance law.
regards
ankit gupta
Harsh Katara
01 December 2010 at 14:32
Sir my father has got notice u/s.138(b) stating that a cheque has been issued dated 10/10/2010 for settlement with bank amounting to roughly Rs.61,835 & that cheque has been bounced because of insufficiency of funds, & they are asking 4 payment within 15 days & threating to file suit u/s.138 of Negotiable Instrument Act,1881 in fact my father never gave such cheque.. it was only in d begginning that he gave cheques during sanction i.e at the time of taking Personal loan of Rs.40,000/-.Further details of notice cheque bounced date was 14/10/2010 & the client who issued notice came to know about bouncing of cheque on 01/11/2010 & notice date is 27/11/2010..as my father is jobless he is unable to pay even instalments..so if any1 could help me in this situation!!
Anonymous
01 December 2010 at 12:55
1. DOES THE LAW PROHIBIT A PERSON FROM ARGUING HIS OWN CASE IN DISTRICT COURT (CIVIL CASE) IN THE ABSENCE OF ADVOCATE. IF YES, THEN WHY THE COURT ASKS FOR THE PRESENCE OF ADVOCATE.
2. CAN A PLAINTIFF CROSS EXAMINE DEFENDANT IN DISTRICT COURT (CIVIL CASE) IN THE ABSENCE OF ADVOCATE. IF YES, THEN WHY THE COURT ASKS FOR THE PRESENCE OF ADVOCATE.
3. CAN THE DEFENDANT AFTER GETTING LEAVE TO DEFEND FROM ADJ, AND FILING W S, RAISE MORE ISSUES AT THE TIME OF ARGUMENT IN CIVIL CASE.
KINDLY GIVE YOUR EXPERT OPINION WITH THE HELP OF RELEVANT SECTIONS OR THE CASE LAWS IF POSSIBLE. THANKS IN ADVANCE.
HARVINDER SINGH ANAND
01 December 2010 at 12:23
The original judgement in the court file is not available,certified copy has also been lost and only xerox copy of the certified copy is available.Is such a document maintainable in the eye of law as secondary evidence?
Anonymous
01 December 2010 at 11:17
my query is
if the whole will is typed but only date on which the will is made is written by pen by the typist,
can i challenge the will on this basis????
because i daubt that the will is typed before that date of registration
and whether a housewife having no source of income can make the will?
i also want to know that whether it is sufficient ground on which i can challenge the will of my grandmother?
Anonymous
01 December 2010 at 10:57
After a long and continous work several workers from a hotel removed and hotel was also closed . The workers not received their salary .For getting back the salary what is the remedy for the hotel workers? whether they come under labour law?
Thank you.
Anonymous
30 November 2010 at 22:39
Respected Advocates,
A revenue officer and some of the revenue staffs have tried to trap me and harassed me for two years with malicious intention on the application of an outsider. The report and entire order sheet proves his malicious intention, which is full of manipulation and forgery.
If I files compensation as well as criminal suit against the revenue staffs, then what is the time limit(after the final report) for it?
Documentary proofs are sufficient; in this condition do need to give list of eye and other witnesses?
If they file false case after filing the suit by me, then will the false suit by them will stand?
Plz. Advice.
Thanks and regds,
Anonymous
30 November 2010 at 20:55
In one trust as per PTR there are two trustees. as per instrument of trust, charity commissioner may appoint trustee if no. of trustees are less than 3 based on application of any interested party. One interested party applied to become trustee, charity commisioner advices present two trustees to appoint another. However as per scheme of trust if no. of trustees are less than 3, existing trustees can perform only day to day activities. Also, existing trustees have already resigned long back. In such circumstances, how interested person become a trustee of the trust. Pls suggest.
somnathsingh
30 November 2010 at 18:50
An Agreement of Sale is entered by father and son in favour of tenant already in possession. Before sale deed is executed by them, son got issued legal notice to the tenant (agreement holder) expressing sole ownership by virtue of will deed executed by his mother (original land lady now expired) in his favour.
The tenant filed “Suit for Specific Performance” making Father and Son as Defendant 1 and Defendant 2. The two sisters of D! got implied as D3 and D4 and challenging the will.
Over ruling the above documents the Original Suit was decreed in favour of Plaintiff (tenant) against D1 and D2 for executing the Sale deed for 50% of the suit property. Confirming balance 50% ownership to sisters by invalidating the alleged will. The sisters are not willing to sell the property.
Aggrieved by the Specific Performance decree, brother preferred an appeal and it is pending.
Is the (Respondent) Tenant can demand to execute sale deed of the sisters shares by giving considerations.
If the appeal is pronounced in favour of appellant confirming sole ownership in this case can Tenant demand to execute sale deed of the remaining 50% unregistered belonging to sisters after this share was own by the brother in Appeal.
What will be the situation of unregistered portion suit property, if the brother states that he will execute the sale deed for the entire property in the lower court pleadings and wins in appeal.
Since the tenant has not preferred any appeal against the lower court decree. Is he eligible to put the abovementioned demands in the appellate court. Please advise.
Regards
Somnath
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Final Decree relating to Immovable Property
In a suit for partition relating to immovable property, does the final decree ipso facto transfer the title of the property to the parties to whom such property has been alloted by the court, or is any further documentation/process required? If so, what are they? Any insight on this point would be greatly appreciated. Thank You