Anonymous
16 July 2011 at 21:57
Under which provision a civil contempt for disobey of judgment of District Judge by the lower court can be filed before him.
Anonymous
16 July 2011 at 21:23
hello sir/madam this is raju from hyd..my qyery is that my father worked as sub_inspector of police in ranga reddy dist.who took a loan amount of 1.3 lakhs in 2004.the period for the loan payment z 31st july 2007..n my father retired form the service on same day...but he did not pay the loan...and who died in 2008...now we are getting notices from the court...we dont have any properties..we r just living on the pension amount...wt do u suggest me ....what should i do ?
thiyagarajan.s
16 July 2011 at 19:30
dear sir
right now i am in rental house for past 15 year but now the landlord want to vacate me out from that house i need sufficient time for that than how will i get stay order from court because my landlord want to reconstruct for commercial purpose what will i do please give idea to me
he try to take violent activities
so please tel how to face this in legally
Anonymous
16 July 2011 at 19:13
My name is RAMU V and my father name is VENKATAREDDY M.But my father original name is M CHINNA VENKATA REDDY .i've two brothers their names are LAKSHMAN V and BHARATH V.
The problem is in my and first brother records father name is venkatareddy m and in my second brother records father name came as only venkatareddy.and also my father name in ration card and voter id venkatareddy but in bank a/c's and electricity bill was as M CHINNA VENKATA REDDY.
Give me suggestion to change father name in records of three brothers as M CHINNA VENKATA REDDY , And our initials should changed to M it describes our home name ...
Anonymous
16 July 2011 at 17:30
Dear Friends ,
By virtue of Andhra Pradesh state Inam Abolition Act 1955 (Telangana Area), can a Central Government Organisation becomes owner of an Agricultural Land; who has taken this particular land on LEASE from the Inamdar?
The Central Government Organisation says they are the owners, because they are in the position of the land on 1-11-1973 ( the vesting date, as per the above Act.)!
Thanking you ALL expecting an early reply PLEASE. Matter is little URGENT nature Please !
shah dipesh
16 July 2011 at 14:30
i have lended some money to one person by cheque. it is in the balance sheet as unsecured loan and was paying me regular interest. but now he has stopped paying interest and also refusing to give money back. now what should i do to recover my money and if possible please let me know the section under which i can proceed.
Basavaraj
16 July 2011 at 12:42
Dear Members,
Could you please provide me the Bombay High Court judgment dated 13-0-7-2011.
I went through the High Court website, but I could not get it. A division bench of Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice Girish Godbole
Please Help m out:
Subject matter: Court upholds BMC ban on hookahs in eateries
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Wednesday upheld a circular issued by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) banning the use of hookah and other tobacco products in restaurants and eateries.
A division bench of Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice Girish Godbole was hearing a public interest litigation filed by an NGO, "Crusade Against Tobacco", alleging that hookah parlours were selling tobacco products to minors and violating several other rules prescribed under the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COPTA).
Following directions of the court, the BMC, on July 1, 2011, issued a circular, saying "licensee shall not keep or allow to keep or sell or provide any tobacco-related products in any form, whether cigarette, cigar, bidis or otherwise, with the aid of a pipe, wrapper or any other instrument in the licensed premises". The circular also said that the commissioner may permit smoking area in an eating house with a capacity of thirty persons or more. "The smoking area shall be used only for smoking and no other service or any apparatus designed to facilitate smoking shall be provided. No person below 18 shall be permitted in the smoking area," the circular said.
Owners of several restaurants with attached hookah parlours moved the high court. Their counsel S U Kamdar argued that the circular implied a total ban. "They have banned much more than curtailing. Act does not totally ban hookah. Under the rules, if one provides a separate smoking place, it does not become part of the restaurant,'' said Kamdar.
The judges said there is no merit in the arguments advanced on the behalf of owners of hookah parlours and directed the state government to inform all municipal corporations across Maharashtra to implement the circular within a month.
Petitioner's lawyers Zal Andhyarujina and Sanjay Kadam argued that restaurants do not follow the rules for segregation of smoking and non-smoking areas, thereby exposing non-smokers to air pollution. "There is no effective mechanism to filter out major from minor persons," argued Andhyarujina. He said merely raiding would not solve problem but a constant surveillance on a daily basis was required. The court has adjourned the matter to July 28, 2011 to see the compliance of its directions.
The judges directed the government to inform all municipal corporations across the state to implement the circular within a month.
I will be great full if anyone send this advance.
Alok Mishra
16 July 2011 at 10:40
Respected Members
i am working with a mining company, having mines at Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan and Jharkhan.
i have to do a legal audit of mines, can any one please provide me a check list on Mining laws for these states.
in particular, i need what all documents should one have before mining, monthly compliance/return, quarterly comppliance/return, half yearly and yearly compliance/return to be filed and with whom.
Anonymous
15 July 2011 at 21:40
My relative is retired from government service some seven years ago. He is old, alone and single without any family or offspring. His only savings is the modest dwelling unit where he presently lives and the land is under dispute. He got this land for construction of house after becoming a member in a cooperative land and housing Society of employees of a central government organisation. He got allotment (thru draw of lots from about ten vacant plots) that was one of the recovered from the initial allottee who has been given postal notice to the address that was available in the Society’s records and newspaper advertisement for the intended recovery of the plot allotted to him. He started constructing the house raising bank loans. He had almost constructed the modest house, the original allottee managed to get a verdict from the Registrar of Cooperative Society that the allotment made by the Society to him is not valid. He approached the District Court and the verdict was not in his favour. Therefore, he approached the High Court and the Hon’ble High Court had directed him to remit a sum equivalent to the present market rate of the land to the Society which is presently managed by the Special Officer as the Society is not having an elected managing committee of members of the Society. The amount spelt out is far higher and hefty, absolutely beyond his means. Had it been the rate prevailing at the time of allotment (made some eight years ago) he could have somehow managed to pay the same to the Society. With no option on hand he approached the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court, thankfully, had stayed operation of the High Court order. Considering his age he wants to give a general power of attorney to one of his nephews who can handle the case further. Question is: whether can he give a GPA to any one at this juncture? Is it permitted by law?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
recovery of loan by co-operative bank
in the year 2004 i took a loan of 75,000/- as cosumer loan. the cheque was drawn in favour of a shopkeeper who was ( as per him)an agent even i had an account in the said bank. he issued acheque in favour of me as agreed previously but was returned by the shopkeepers bank and i endup getting nothing. the bank went to cooperative court and a judgement was given in bank's favour showing me as absent at all hearing. as per the courts direction Rs2500/- was deducted from my salary but was stopped after 24 months as per rule 60 of civil procedure code. the bank doesn't agree to it and says that the action is wrong.
pl give me the rule to over rule civil procedure code( if any) and possible action open to the bank.