sridhar pasumarthy
20 September 2012 at 18:26
Respected Experts,
Father died working as an employee in postal department leaving his only son as his heir. Son, who is a major, has been suffering from epilepsy(Seizure Disorder). Now, the department authorities require the son to approach court and get a guardian appointed for him to receive pension, as he is a disabled person.
My queries are :-
1. Is the procedure suggested by the postal authorities is correct according to law?
2. If so, under what provision of law, appointment of a guardian can be sought for and in which forum?
3. Any other remedy open to the son?
Kindly suggest. It's urgent.
Thanks for reply in advance.
AK K
20 September 2012 at 15:19
Hi Everyone,
I know that the meaning of FIR is "First Information Report". My question is
1) How long is the validity of the FIR?
2) Can the culprits close/void the FIR and do something against me in collusion with the police?
Kindly suggest.
Manoj Jain
20 September 2012 at 14:02
Dear Experts
I am living in a property with my family since 1980, but not having any Rent Agreement or Rent receipts till date with landlord,but I have all proofs of my residence in form of School/ College certificates, Birth/Death Certificates, Bills from Electricity, telephone & Assessment in Nagar nigam ,now the landlord want to remove property forcefully, is it possible or what are the legal actions which i can opt in the situation.
saroja
20 September 2012 at 11:56
"A" expired leaving behind his wife and minor son. Wife sold A's self acquired property on her own and also on behalf of minor son.
In this case court permission not taken to sell minor's share
In my opinion,restriction (getting prior permission of the court for disposing any immoveable property of a minor) on the natural guardian in respect of property of a minor applies only to the separate or absolute property of the minor and does not include the minor’s undivided share in the joint family property.
Pls advice whether court permission required or not ?
Regards,
Saroja
smarty
20 September 2012 at 11:47
Dear Sir,
I am a married woman living in Ghaziabad (UP) India my marriage was done in 1984 and my father was expired in 1995 and mother was expired in 2012 my parents have left the many property which was used by my two brothers and I am financially very week. I want to take my share in my parents property but i can not bear huge court fees. So kindly give me advice how can I claim my share in my parents property.
Ramesh
20 September 2012 at 11:41
Dear Experts of the Forum,
My family gave some land to( Military Estate Officer) Army on lease in the year 1963,under a lease agreement. Lease amount is also been paid till 1987. Now suddenly,the army claims the land (under Lease to ARMY through 'MEO') as their own, citing Inam abolition act condition { as per Act.;One can becomes owner, if he is an occupier of the land (under his position) by constructing building, as on 1-11-1973; but this rule is applicable to only private persons and not, to Govt. organization like INDIAN ARMY}.
High Court of AP, upheld our cliam and denied the claim of INDIAN ARMY('MEO'). But now ('MEO') ARMY is approaching the SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.
Our family is disgusted with this act of ('MEO')INDIAN ARMY.
Please guide us, what should we do?
Thanking You ALL, Expecting an early reply; PLEASE.
rajan nair
20 September 2012 at 07:15
1) how is the camp sittings of state consumer forums done?
2) is it based on the requests of the parties of the relevant cases?
3) Is it mandatory to hold certain no.of camp sittings on different locations apart from the permanent place of the forum?
4) How does one know,details of such camp sittings if any?(whether published through some websites or through paper notifications)
rahul gogri
20 September 2012 at 03:41
I/M THE OWNER OF A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WHICH IS A SRA PROJECT,
WE WANT TO INSTALL A AIR CONDITION OUTDOOR UNIT ON THE BACK ENTRY OF OUR SHOWROOM WHICH HAVE A COMMON COMPOUND TO ENTRY FOR THE TENANT BUILDING,
MY A/C CAN BE IN INSTALLED AT THE HIEGHT OF 7.5 FEETS FROM GROUND... BUT THE TENANT ARE RAISING THE OBEJECTION FOR THE SAME . ASKING FOR THE REASON THEY DO NOT REPLY.....
THEY SAY WE DONT HAVE A REASON WE HAVE OBJECTION THATS WHAT THEY SAY,
THE A/C DOES NOT HAVE HARM TO ANY ......AND I DONT HAVE ANY OPTION OTHER THAN THAT PLACE TO INSTALL MY A/C.....
PLEASE TELL ME HOW COULD I GO FORWARD TO THAT........
Ramkrishna
19 September 2012 at 22:47
I HAVE ENGAGED A LAWYER TO FIGHT AN ENCROACHMENT CASE IN 2010 AND THERE IS W.P AND C.C PENDING IN THE HIGH COURT AND I HAVE ALREADY PAID HIM IN FULL.
MY LAWYER RECENTLY DIED IN USA.
THE C.C HAS COME UP FOR HEARING.
HOW SHOULD I GO ABOUT THIS IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCE.
THE JUNIOR LAWYER IS NOT CAPABLE OF HANDLING THIS MATTER.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Will matter
sir, I have put two query two days ago.but you cannot explain the second query.
(1)can the first witness who is the attested witness on the will also a scribe on the will can prove the unregistered will indiviualy because according to law atleast one witness can prove the will.This witness accept in his cross examination he seen the testator sign on the will when both(two ) attested witnesses are present and after sign by testator both witness sign on the will as a attesting witnesses. because the testator ask both the witnesses sign on the will as a attesting witness His witness is complete.second winess also accept the signature of testator and he accept his signature on the probate petition his witness is goingon.both the partition suit and probate case are consolidated.