santosh Pawar
02 April 2014 at 19:25
Sir,
My uncle has filed a partition suit in the hon’ civil court, Pune in 2004, as per compromise decree in hon’ Highcourt in the year 2000 , Bombay between my uncle and my father for our ancestral agriculture property in Pune. As per compromise decree it was agreed to give 1/4th share to my uncle and partition is to be carried out by mutual consent between my father and uncle through collector or its subordinates. My father expired in 2006 and till date we were not made party in the partition suit as legal heir of my father. Recently hon’ civil court passed order in partition suit and has sent letter to collector and tahsil office for execution of decree as per the civil procedure code 54 and we came to know about the letter from tahsil office.A 60 mtrs road passes from land and also 4 nos. of electricity high tension tower are erected on said land after the decree in 2000.
Sir, my question is, what is civil procedure code 54 and is it possible for us to object to partition, as land which is affected due the reservation has to be deducted before partition, otherwise we will suffer. Sir, please guide how to proceed in the above matter.
VINOD KUMAR MALSARIA
02 April 2014 at 15:39
Map of building not passed by authorities beacuse builder have not apply for this. builder construct 12 flat on land and sale out without approved Map and allot the parking lots in unsufficiant area.
One flat owner construct the another door in front of building.
there are no any approved map which are proved parking area & gate ,window
Can any flat owner file the Case in court against builder.
rajashekar
02 April 2014 at 13:44
dear sirs,my father was a govt employee.but he passed away while he is in duty,
he have got married another lady after my mother's death,my step mother have 3 girls children.they all married.
after my father's death now m going to claim dues from the employer.
now my query is
do my step mother have rights to get share from that dues?
but i heard that karnataka high court said on oct 30th 2013 second wife's children don't have rights to demand in compensation,but they have rights only in property.but second wife can get pension
is this true?
also fact is my step mother left my father before 20 years,she filed case to get (i don't know it in english sorry)jeevana amsha (kannada) in that time.
she is not in my family also.
what can i do?
also i didn't know about her till my father's death.
please advise me
sonal
02 April 2014 at 12:38
Hi guests
as i qouted my query earlier,i want to know employee is absconding with comapny phone and joined compititor.
we not having proof that he has our phone or he is in possesion of company assest..if we get that proof can we file suit under specific relief under sec 21 (3) asking court to direct him perform duty,submit phone also ask claim for metal harrassment..
with this can we file injunction suit that he should not joined copitor fr next 2 yrs mentio in appointment letter...pls advice can i proceed with these two option...should i file 2 suits one of injunction and second of specific performance?
i beg you guest last time help me plsss begging you all
Regards
DIPTIRANJAN PATRA
02 April 2014 at 01:28
in election different things like boat,animal,vehicles etc are requisition by order of Collector & DM as per power conferred on them U/S 160 of RP ACT 1951. in the said act in section 167 it provides that whoever disobey the order issued U/S 160 of RP Act shall liable to be punished for imprisonment of up to one year. so in case of any violation detected who shall issue the warrant of arrest under the said penal provision.
armaan kapoor
02 April 2014 at 00:45
Dear sir,
The original agreement that I am relying upon in a civil court wherein I am plaintiff. is misplaced. I hav only one witness to prove my agreement. Pls guide me as to what I can do to prove my case.
Mustafa Bhat
01 April 2014 at 19:49
Sir,
Appeal seeking to set aside order passed by Lower court 15 months before in RCR.
Grounds for appeal.
1) Court was to address by way of framing charges.
2) Does not proceed in a manner as provided in CPC.
3) No efforts in deciding matter on merits. Shortcut by dismissing case on the basis of default in paying the cost imposed by court.
4) The applicant was well within his right to seek adjournment. The lower court in one go decided the adjournment prayed besides dismissing the on the ground not pressed.
5) No were reflected in order whether any withdrawal application has been made by applicants Counsel.
6) The Court could have vacated interim directions on that days rather than dismissing the case.
7) The applicant was busy with & was out of station & his counsel was ill & was not available in court for full year.
Condonation Ground to be taken
Affidavit in support of appeal.
Hon’ble court may please set aside the order passed by lower court & hear the parties a fresh on merits of case.
RCR was filled by my divorced wife( to whom I divorced in 2009 as per Muslim personal law as we are both Muslims)in 2010,were in they got stay for my second marriage,i was already married on the day of stay, they then filled contempt petition,later court in 2012 dismissed the case along with along all CMPS & stay if any stand vacated as not pressed by the plaint.
Now in 2014 they (Plaintiff) have applied in higher court to set aside the order of lower court.
RAKESH KUMAR
01 April 2014 at 12:51
Dear Sirs,
This is a type of short story. There were two friends, let's say, "A" and "B". "A" was the Sole Proprietor of a business and he had availed Bank Overdraft facility with the Bank and "B" was the Guarantor for the said OD facility provided by the Bank. "B" had availed a Home Loan from the same Bank and "A" was the Guarantor in the Home Loan. Now, "B" refused to renew the OD facility and as such, the OD facility was terminated by the Bank. What would be the remedy available to "A", if he wants to withdraw his Guarantorship from the Home Loan provided by the Bank to "B"? Can he sue "B" legally for the loss of business owing to termination of OD facility?
Please guide me by providing your esteemed advice.
Thanks and Regards
sonal
01 April 2014 at 12:23
Dear guest
i know limitation for filing summary suits is 3 years. i run a business and my client is not gvng money.. i am emailing him but he is saying i dont owe you any thing..he is not acknowledging debt.
can i file recovery case?
is ackmowledging debt imp? please guide?
alos in one of my cases 3 years have ben pasesd..2 months over now,,can igo for recovery suit?
please begging for help..guide me guest..
regards
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Email as evidence
Is there any case law in which evidence is Email?or landmark judgment by supreme court?