shamataneja
30 November 2011 at 12:04
after enforcing the decree and taking back the possession .is the Chambers Summons maintainable?
My opponent has taken out the chamber summons to take back the possession. But I have already executed the decree and now possession is in my custody
varma
25 November 2011 at 10:22
sir, In High court my father lost his case i.e house in 300 sq yd land in year 2008.But recently we came to know that during filing the case i.e our opposend submit valuation of market is 3 lakhs instead of 12 lakhs & paid cout fee accordingly.At that time due to ignorance we donot raise that point.Final decree also pssed in favour of opposend in june/2008.Now my father also expired.Now My question is
1)Whether I can challenge in court due to undervalued of stampduty, put the decree a side & cancell the order
2)What is the time period to challenge the undervalued stamp duty after final decree is passed
3)Not only me,Any 3rd party i.e outsiders who knows this truth of undervalued stamp duty can challenge in court after once final decree is passed & IN how many days 3rd party can challenge in court after final decree is passed against undervalud stampduty of court fee.
Jolly James 9447287658
18 November 2011 at 20:23
my grand father died in the year 1962. He had one son and 4 daughters. My mother died in the year 2008. Which provision I can claim share over the property.Wether Marumakkathayam is applicable in the above matter. case from kerala
deepak
07 November 2011 at 10:39
jugement issues,1)do plaintiffs prove their right,title & interest oversuit prop.2)do plaintiffs prove that defend.are in permissive possession of the suit prop.3)do defend.prove that they are posseessing sit prop. in their independ. capacity as tenant?4)do plaint. prover that they own the entire material of the suit shop?5)whether plaint. are entittled for the reliefs claimed?6)what order & cost?Findings answer,1)yes,2)yes,3)no,4)yes,5)yes,6)as per inal order.ORDER,suit stands decreed with costs. defend. are hreby restrained by order of injun. from working or conducting saloon business in suit shop having shop xyz. H.C.FIRST Appeal for stay,order is pending.notice U.XXIrule 22&32(1) served for exition.can i get possession of the suit permissive? 2)i ask for civil prison & attachment ofsuit property?
varma
04 November 2011 at 11:44
sir,
I requested to all experts (Advocates: prabakaran sir,makkad sir,ajay setti sir,ramachandran sir, shonee kapoor sir....) PLZ reply for my query for below link which I posted on 3/11/11 but I did not get full answer..
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Design-a-suit-245186.asp
varma
01 November 2011 at 15:19
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Absolute-true-owner-235501.asp
In above link as i did not get exact answer I am continuing for above link..
sir,
any of my neighbour i.e 4 side of my house not showing interest in involving in this legal litigant.So I decided to go with outside defendnt.Now
1)Any one can design a suit for me for my above link query for how to become me as plantiff praying in court for relief of permanent injuction which involves indirectly me as absolute owner(only relief suit but not declaratory title suit) for my property against defendant.
NOTE:My plan is here I want to suit on defendant(dummy).After suit defendant does not respond for court summon.Then I will pray for EXPARTE decree for permanent relief by showing all my proofs & declared decree in my favour
mahendrakumar
09 October 2011 at 15:46
a consumer case is at the stage of cross exam of op.
it is expected that the op would not be telling truth on certain matters .
how can we as a complainant counter the lies with documents obtained through rti replies?
1) can we counter the wrong statements with this documents during cross exam?
2) should we seek the permission of the forum to admit this as additional evidence?
3) how do we mark this new evidence if required?can we give a copy of this to the OP and forum then?
4) exhibits A1 to A5 were submitted by us and examined by the op earlier.so during the cross exam,can we ask the forum to mark these additional evidence(if needed as it would depend upon the answers of the op during cross exam) for countering the op's replies as exhibit A6 and A7
eventhough,consumer forums are not bound to follow any strict technicalities,experts opinion on the above would be highly appreciated.
Dr.Firdos Ahmed
04 October 2011 at 20:23
Gime me openion regarding power of High Court over rulling of Wakf Tribunal.
AJAYA KUMAR DASH
30 September 2011 at 10:11
Respected Sir,
My grand mother who had purchase two peaces of land an area Ac.1.083 & Ac.1083 decimals from one Khata and one Plot vide two registered sale deed on dt.13.06.86 with specific boundary and sketch map from all 8 nos co-sharers / owners through their general power of Attorney Holder who is also one co-owners. On the same day said Power of attorney holder had executed registered sale deeds in favour of other 10 persons from the same one Khata and plot . But in each and every sale deeds of nos of difeerent vendee inadvertenly wrong khata number was mentioned although the plot no, area and boundary was correctly mentioned.
My grand mother died in died in 27.04.1996 and after her demise the legal heirs my father and uncle are continuing in peaceful possession as owner thereof and has already filed a suit in the year 2004 in hon'ble trial court for suit for declaration with a relief for correction of Khata number in the sale deed and the same is pending for defence evidence.
We came to know that in the year 2011, Three( 3) other different subsequent purchaser / vendee who purchases in the year 1990 from the same partial six(6) nos out of 8 (eight) of co-owners without partition by metes and bound by virtue of other registered sale deed from the same boundary and sketch map which was attached in my grand mother sale deeds , after filing 3 nos of different suit for permanet injuction in the same hon'ble trial court against my father and uncle and interim order is passed to maintain status quo of this suit land in our absence.
Further all the 3 nos subsequent purchasers / vendees filed separate application under CPC order 1 rule 10 to implead as party in the suit for declaration of correction of khata no filed by my father and uncle.
Therfore you are hereby requested to be kind enough to furnish me the and relevant judgement for :
01. Dissmiss the application for Impleadment as party in suit for declaration.
02. Dissmiss the interim status quo order in suit for permanet injunction.
Thanking you,
With Regards,
A.K.Dash
A/56, Sahidnagar,
Bhubaneswar - 751007
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Limitation act
Dear Colleagues,earlier advocate on record filed the Misc Civil Appeal challenging the order of status quo in which there is delay of 400 days.The delay is because of negligence of earlier advocate but in appeal memo he has mentioned that he could not get knowledge of status quo order and got the same at late stage.Appeal memo and delay application is already filed. At this juncture i have filed my v.p. by taking noc from earlier advocate.NOW I have following querry.PL. ENLIGHEN ME ON.
1)Whether i have to stick up with stand taken by earlier advocte?
2)Change in stand will practically amount to replacing earlier application, which court may/may not allow.
3) Any citation in the present facts?
4)Any citation for condoning delay of 400 days in filing Misc. Civil Appeal?