4WhatIsRight
28 August 2017 at 23:21
We are two brothers living in a two storeyed building constructed in single foundation.
We got the property apportioned and mutated in our individual names.
Front portion numbered as plot 1A and back side portion as 1B.
We have built a 6 feet high wall on roof/terrace.
Recently my brother erected a mobile tower on his side.
As the chances of radiation are there, I am unable to use my roof.
I asked my brother to remove the tower but he is adamant, he says that it is on his side and I have no business to object.
I am not in favour of allowing this mobile tower on roof as it hinders roof usage.
Local police says that they have no role to play.
kaur
25 August 2017 at 14:02
I am plaintiff in the case and filed my affidavit in chief and also submitted application to court to call defendant no.3 as witness to prove certain documents and his handwriting for which opposite party counsel objected to this and court did not allow my application and dismiss the same. Experts please guide me what remedy available whether to approach High Court .
Mohammed Rizwan Shaikh
23 August 2017 at 02:58
Respected Experts,
The Legal Heirs of the deceased (Muslim) have filed Testamentary Petition for the Letter for Administration in the High Court of Bombay. The Legal Heirs did not include the wife and widow of the said deceased in the Testamentary. Petition. The Legal Heir suppressed the true facts before the Honble High Court. The deceased holds several properties in Mumbai wherein in the said petition they even suppressed the same. They just included only two properties excluding the Court matters which were filed in respect to various lands in Mumbai. The legal heirs were well aware that out the 2 properties which have been mentioned in the Schedule of the Property, one property has already been gifted to the widow several years back. In the said petition, they legal heir claimed to be the next of the kin whereas the truth is that the deceased disliked/ disowned them when he was alive. Several complaints have been filed with the Government Authorities against the legal heirs by the deceased. The wife/widow of the deceased wants to intervene in the said Testamentary Petition by filing Caveat and Affidavit in Support of Caveat to claim her rights in the share of the deceased which has been suppressed by the legal heirs.
Question:
1. After filing of the Caveat and Affidavit in Support, what relief can be claimed by the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction Court?
2.Can the widow seek stay over the property which has already been gifted by the deceased?
3.Can the widow file Partition Suit to claim her share in the properties left by the deceased?
4. What will be the outcome of the Testamentary Petition or the Suit?
5. As the legal heirs have suppressed the true facts and lied before the High Court, what action can be taken by the widow and by the Court?
EXPERTS !!! Your advice in this regard, shall be very very high appreciated
Regards,
Mohammed Shaikh
Pavan
22 August 2017 at 10:48
I have transferred 5 lac Rs. by NetBanking to seller for products and for security purpose i have taken security cheque of 5 lac Rs from that seller.
My question is :
1) Is only security cheque is safe? (Because later he may cancel cheque, close bank account or present wrong signature etc)
2) Is there any other safe way ?
Simmi
10 August 2017 at 00:34
My ancestors residence is in bihar and we used to live there. We migrated to Delhi after 1993. But since last 15 years I'm living in Delhi and completed my schooling as well as graduation from here. We used to go to bihar and cast certificates were issued on the behalf of my grandparents from the tehsildaar. Is it legal? My cast is there in the central list as well as state list of both bihar and Delhi. Is there anyway I can get the OBC certificate made in Delhi as I need a centrally issued certificate. How can I get it made. I have a certificate issued from bihar (Anchal adhikari office). Please help its very important. Thank you.
Anonymous
04 August 2017 at 15:39
Respected Experts
My question is under MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT.
I am running a GROCERY business at a shop in which we are tenant since 1963. First tenant was my father who died in 2005 and after that the new owner (owner since 1981) has filed a case against me for bonafide requirement. I have won the case at district level and now the case is pending with Bombay high court.
My question is whether I can run a bakery business and other food items in this shop i.e. whether bakery items covered under grocery business or not. Please note that the owner is running a sweet shop including bakery in this premises only.
Thanking you in advance
jitender
04 August 2017 at 12:44
Hi All,
I opened Capital gain account in SBI Sector 55 Noida , which was linked to my old dormant SBI saving account. Bank confirmed me your account will be transferred to this branch and will be active soon. I submitted request for transfer and transferred Rs 1000 to Saving account no. But bank said it will take more than month to transfer and they have sent request to branch.
Unluckily i was not having login and no active phone no was attached to my bank account. So i was not getting update. Bank issued a passbook which had two account no one was printed and other was hand written. I asked my Saving account no so bank employee wrote a wrong account no on my passbook detail page.
Now i deposited a cheque which was on my name and wrong account no. Despite of mismatch in name bank transferred the amount to wrong account. Other party withdrawn the amount and spent it. Bank is saying we are trying to get money from other party and will refund amount as soon as we received.
Other party returned 15 % of money and later refused to pay money. Police refused to file FIR of bank against third party. I went to police and police refused to file my FIR against bank. 15 % amount which bank has recovered is not transferred to my account.
i sent multiple mails to SBI AGM , DGM and chairman but no one replied. Online filed complaint got auto closed.
i am not aware this case should be filed in consumer court or District forum.
Need advice from expert what to do in such case.
Anonymous
02 August 2017 at 10:07
Uncle cheated illitarate grandfather. Grandfather admitted that his brothers son have right in property acquired by him under kulkayda. All documents proving that land is his personal property. Can we prove that admission was wrong? Case decreed in 1994. Appeal in 2002 rejected. In 2005 appeal as decree obtained by fraud admitted.
Manuj
27 July 2017 at 22:47
Sir, my business suffered a big loss three years back leaving me in heavy debts. I cleared most of them selling all my assets and little savings that I had. Then I was left with nothing. I tried various businesses but all failed due to lack of funds. I am 45 . I tried to get a job but did not have a service record so did not get a suitable job. Situation went from bad to worse. I am not able to take care of my family. My father at 73 is taking care if us with whatever little means he has. I don't give up that easily but few remaining creditors have made my life hell. I neither have any means nor any hope of repaying them in the near future. Few months back, a close friend of mine suggested me to legally file for bankruptcy, but I never could even think of it. But now, situation is beyond my control. My family is merely surviving. Is applying for bankruptcy possible. If yes, how can it help ?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Rwa and colony gates
With the increase in population, there is a continuous surge in external persons/ traffic entering residential colonies to either illegally park their cars, take short cuts to avoid main roads,and just hang around in large numbers ending up dirtying and misusing Private property.
In many cases internal space is taken away by outsiders who permanently park their cars overnight, illegally create permanent jhuggis,food stalls,and sleeping rights by rickshaw pullers, taxi drivers etc.
To avoid this misuse, RWAs put up colony gates and where ever feasible keep them closed. However MCD and the Courts have never been in favour of the RWA keeping gates closed, and given rulings to keep gates open, under the ground of ease of movement, and objections by some residents.
My query is -Under what grounds and law can RWAs appeal in the Delhi Court to keep some of their Colony gates closed ?