Is there any provision in CPC of getting help from central forces (such as RAF or army) in case local police authority does not able/capable of delivery of possession?
Anonymous
29 January 2018 at 10:45
Hello Experts,
I have seen my property regsitration papers yesterday. In Payment Challan MTR 6 which i have seen the details of property including my buyer Name its me and seen there is validity of CHallan like 28/08/2015 and valid till 31/03/2099. ?
I wants to know that meaning?
and what will after 2099? is proprty ownership still mine or it would be changed.?
Your Co-operation in this matter highly appreciable.
Thanks in advance.
Kamlesh Shah
+91 97692 52358
Anonymous
29 January 2018 at 02:05
Sir our land is 143 and we have the document for it but we are getting notice that the signature of officers are not in correct sequence date. Ur 143 is not correct. What is our fault. It is the officer mistake. Is it our crime
Daleep singh
29 January 2018 at 01:48
Our property is 143 but officer make mistakes in signature
Anonymous
28 January 2018 at 22:29
1.One private finance company has put my name in place of guarantor and sending me notice to repay the car loan taken by some un known person.
2. When I came to know, I reply to the advocate of company that I never give any gurantee to the said person.
3. Meanwhile I received a notice from finance company about appointment of an arbitrator I replied that I am not a party as I never give any document or my concern for any loan or guarantee. but just after 5 to 7 days I received a letter from arbitrator that he put hearing of above case at *th feb and ask to appear me in personal or trough counsellor. If I not appear before him he will pass an ex party order.
My questions are
1. Should I appear before arbitrator even I am not a party as I never give any gurantee of above said loan?
2. If arbitrator pass any order against me than how and where can I challenge his order?
3. Can I deny to appear before him?
4. What action can I take against finance company and borrower also?
5. How can I take stay against arbitration procedure?
6. any other remmedy?
7. What I have to do now?
krishna
28 January 2018 at 20:33
Information: As per initial survey revenue record(1958),survey no:353/1 is of 4 acres owned by 3 members .
survey no: 353/2 is of 8 Acres owned by 6 members (1.Mr.Ram, 2. Mr.B, 3.Mr.Dasaradh, 4.Mr.D, 5.Mr.E, 6.Mr.F) but each person share is not mentioned in that record.
then, Re-survey done in 1967. In between 1958 to 1967 there is no survey record.
As per Re-survey record(1967),survey no:353/1 is sub divided into 4 sub divisons of 1acre each (353/1,353/2,353/3,353/4) survey no:353/2 is sub divided into 8 sub divisons of 1acre each (353/5,353/6,353/7,353/8,353/9,353/10,353/11,353/12).
it is clearly mentioned that S.No 353/10 is owned by Mr.Putra son of Mr. Lakshman in re-survey revenue record(1967).
Case: Mr.Dasaradh has two sons Mr.Ram and Mr.Lakshman. Mr.Ram has 3 sons, namely Mr.ramesh, Mr.suresh, Mr. Naresh. Mr.Lakshman has 1 son ,namely Mr.Putra. In 1974, Mr.Ravana bought 1 acre of land from Mr.ramesh son of Mr.Ram. in that sale deed it is mentioned that out of 8 acres in s.no 353/2, 1 acre of land sold by Mr.ramesh son of Mr.Ram to Mr.Ravana. there is no specific detail about the 1 acre survey number in that sale deed.
S.no: 353/10 is mutated into the name of Mr.Putra's wife and it is in the enjoyment of her. due to old age of Mr.putra's wife , she left the village and staying with her children in city. by taking this advantage Mr.Ravana son is trying to occupy the land of Mr.Putra's wife by showing the sale deed mentioned above. now, Mr.putra's wife went to the court , and got the interim injuction order against Mr.Ravana's son. Mr.Ravana's son submitted sale deed in the court and claiming S.No 353/10 because of no clarity about 1 acre land survey number purchased by Mr.Ravana.
Will Ravana's son get succeded in this case?
Rajesh Joseph
28 January 2018 at 18:18
I have given some money to one of my friends one year back. He is now in Dubai. Whenever I ask money he give some excuses. Now he do not respond, he blocked me in whatsapp. I have transferred amount to his bank account and I have his confirmation on receiving money. Please let me know whether I can file a case in a police station or court? Please advice
Anonymous
28 January 2018 at 05:30
In Os,After Judgement dependent file IA (under limitation act) after 6months. IA Also dismissed. Now dependent file CRP in High Court. What happen in that CRP
Muralikrishna
27 January 2018 at 14:41
The brief facts of the compassionate grounds of appointment, which is temporarily stopped with the HC’s Injunction Order, is clearly discussed here under, and requested the forum experts to guide us with ur valuable suggestions :
After the death of the deceased employee, the daughter of the deceased ie., the petitioner approached the employer for compassionate appointment. Mean the time the illegitimate son entered for the same. And tampered the records and it was proved as tampered, in the court. The Court entitled only the death benefits as partially to the illegitimate son and to his mother, and issued the Succession Certificate only in favour of legally wedded wife and to her daughters.
Family Pension is granted to the favour of the petitioner’s mother (ie., legally wedded wife). All this issues clearly expressed to the employer and the petitioner further approached the employer. Then the employer issued a intimation letter to the Petitioner, and directed the petitioner to submit the Succession Certificate along with her original certificates like Study Certificates, NOCs etc., Petitioner handed over all her originals to the employer. Employer conducted the enquiry process also.
At that instance, the illegitimate son filed a WP in HC, seeking the compassionate appointment, and made the legally wedded wife and her daughters as co-respondents. Hence, the present petitioner also filed a WP in HC as she only the eligible for that appointment, and requested the HC to direct the employer not to appoint the illegitimate son (ie, who was not obtained the Succession). The HC issued an injunction order to stop the appointment, until the matter is proved. Now this issue is pending in HC since a decade.
Now and then the petitioner’s financial condition is in BPL. Years together she is awaiting for the employment. She failed to get any other employment also because she surrendered all her originals to the employer and She crossed about 45 years, still she is bachelor only hoping her employment.
The employer is simply saying ... the petition is in pending in the court, so we can’t do any thing at this instance. (under subjudice HRC also failed to render the justice in this issue).
Recently the illegitimate son, (who intentionally made disturbance in this employment issue) was expired (dead).
For appropriate, immediate relief what sort of procedure the petitioner (she) should follow ??
Hoping once again, experts may extend their valuable guidelines / suggestions in this concern.
Stay order
Respected Sir/Madam
I Sub Court after Judgment, Defendant file IA ( Set side petition)under limitation act 5, that petition dismissed, because they do not show sufficient cause, and day by day delay reasons. Now In High court stay order can passed in CRP if possible for Defendant in suit and petitioners in I A and CRP.