N.K.Assumi
14 August 2008 at 11:41
What are the conditions in order to amount to contract under section 25 (3) of the contract Act? Should there be a fresh offer and acceptance to constitute a contract under sec tion 25 contract Act?
KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA
12 August 2008 at 22:56
In a suit filed by the plaintiff, Whether the court can grant injunction against the plaintiff and in favour of the defendant? If so, under what provision? Please help me
KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA
12 August 2008 at 11:29
In a suit for grant of perpetual injunction against the defendant restraining from interfering with the possession, while dismissing the temporary injunction, having come to the conclusion that the petitioner/plaintiff failed to prove his possession and the respondent/defendant had established his possession and had been making construction in the SSP by obtaining valid permission from the competent authority, Whether the court can direct the respondent/defendant to give an undertaking to demolish the structures raised by him, if at ultimate trial the plaintiff proves his case?
Raja Sundarraman
11 August 2008 at 18:25
Respected Learned Friends, I invite your valuable opinions as to a foriegner purchase purchase land in India. Is the Right to propert enshrined in our Constitution made avilable to a citizens of a foriegn country who was formerly a citizen of India?
rajesh chanda sharma
10 August 2008 at 19:52
I have applied for an information from DIOS siddharthnagar ,comprising copy of an order/note sheet ,he is denying to provide the same in writing, on the ground that,it is a confidential document
is he right?
Sanjeev Mohan
10 August 2008 at 06:27
Sir,
here the question involved is the admissibility of a digital photograph. whether the C.D produced along with the Photo be treated as Primary evidence? Please refer sitations (AIR,SCC)
Srinivas.B.S.S.T
09 August 2008 at 23:50
In an appeal where there are 26 appellants and sole respondent. The sole respondent died. One of the appellants filed petitions under or22 rl4, or22 rl9 and section5 of limitation act to condone the delay. In all the affidavits accompanying with respective petitions, she sworn the affidavits but it was no where mentioned that she is also swearing the affidavit on behalf of the rest of the petitioners/appellants. Can we say that as she has not sworn the affidavit on behalf of rest of the petitioners/appellants the same is not maintainable? Can I have any citation if possible.
Gururja Rao
09 August 2008 at 20:20
Hi all,
I need a legally valid draft House rent agreement tremination notice u/sec 106 of T.P. Act, Can any body provide it. The tenent premises is at Hyderabad, A.P, and the monthly Rent payable by him is Rs 4000/- Per month. The premises under occupation of tenent need to land lord for his personal requirement, further land lord is also resident of Hyderabad,A.P.
Please help me it is Urgent.
Thank you both sir, The Tenancy was oral. at the time of inception of tenancy the teneant paid Rs2,800/-PM,which is excluding electricity and water charges, every year the tenacy was extended orally.please advise me in the said circumstances can i issue him notice terminating his tenancy u/sec 106 of T.P.Act,if you think I can kindly provide me a draft notice, awaiting eagerly.
parikshit rajvaidya
09 August 2008 at 10:55
Dear sir
We a private limited company have purchased a property having plant in the state of UP through registered sale deed. The property includes Land and machinery.
That means the land is being used for industrial purpose.
Thereafter our company has been merged under scheme of amalgamation and merger with another company and Hon'ble HC approved the said scheme.
Now the matter is thate in the state of
UP how such land can be mutated in the name of company in which our comapny got merged.
Actually we have got impression that under UPLR Act no industrial land can be mutated.
Kindly how the property can be mutated.Pls give your valuable suggestions.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Evidence Act
what is "burden of proof" & "onus of proof" ?