Prateek Biyani
14 November 2009 at 17:35
Sir, plz clear me the difference between Order, Dcree, and Judgement.Can appeal be filed against each of them ?
What is interlocutary orders?
Can the parties by agreement decide any place their juridiction by agreement which is neither their residence place, work place or cause of action ?
plz clear the above points in simple language.
thanks in advance.
Bhartiya No. 1
14 November 2009 at 16:56
Respected experts,
We r two persons 'A' and 'B' living in different locations. Both have some lands situated in each other's locality. Some portion of land of'A' is situated adjacent to 'B's house and some portion of land of 'B' situated adjacent to 'A's house. Both are agree and wants to exchange the respective portions of land. Consulted local lawyer on this, they say that both have to do separate registry in each other's name, which is costing a lot. Can it be done thro' exchange deed? If possible pls send exchange deed. Can they exchange in any other cheaper way? THanks and regards.
P.S.Subbaraman
14 November 2009 at 07:45
Whether a illegitimate child born to a Christian entitled to share in the property ?
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
13 November 2009 at 23:15
What is the clear interpretation of this Rule 7A and where it is helpful to use it or what type of suits ?
In Order XX, after rule 7, insert the following rule, namely:-
"7A. formal Order.-
A Court, other than a Court subordinate to the District Court exercising insolvency jurisdiction, passing an order under section 144 or an order against which an appeal is allowed by section 104 or Rule 1 of Order XLII, or an order in any case, against which an appeal is allowed by law, shall, if a party applies for a copy of formal order or the Court so directs, draw up a formal order embodying its adjudication and the memorandum of costs incurred by the parties."
queryking
13 November 2009 at 20:37
what is the procedure to file a civil suit against the Municipality
queryking
13 November 2009 at 20:35
One document (which ought have been registered), the defendnat has produced the same before the court, as the plaintff raised his obejction, the document has not been marked, but while giving the judgment the court has relied on the document and gave verdict against the plaintff. whether court is having power to llok into the unmarked document and can rely on it? is there any citation reagrding unmarked document cannot be looked into?
O. Mahalakshmi
13 November 2009 at 20:32
There are A, B & C brothers. A & B worked hard in the fishing boats field and earned more money and at that time C who is the youngest brother maintaining the boats and cash. Then 'C' himself purchased properties like Agricultural Lands, Plots and some other boats on his and his wife and son's. But A & B are illeterate. Can A and B get any share from 'C's property.
Kindly advise me.
queryking
13 November 2009 at 20:13
One document (which ought have been registered), the defendnat has produced the same before the court, as the plaintff raised his obejction, the document has not been marked, but while giving the judgment the court has relied on the document and gave verdict against the plaintff. whether court is having power to llok into the unmarked document and can rely on it? is there any citation reagrding the unmarked document cannot be lloked into?
edgar sylva
13 November 2009 at 18:05
I was a Trustee of a 108 year old Trust till I demitted office in 2007.
At the AGM of 2008 (Sept 08) the members reappointed a firm as Auditors for the 2008/09 accounts.
They had been doing the audit for nearly 4 months but suddenly on 26 Oct they have resigned without completing the audit.
Is this legal; can they just walk out like this when appointed by the General Body.
( members think they found out something wrong and did not get proper answers from the present Trustees, so they resigned).
ppboy
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE ---- PRINCIPLE OF HIGHEST IMPORTANCE --DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS OF LAWYER AND JUDGES--SUBJECTIVE MOODS, PREDICTIONS, EMOTIONS AND PREJUDICES OF JUDGES HAVE NO PLACE IN IMPARTING FAIR AND IMPARTIAL JUSTICE.
[PARA 19,20]
1998 SUPREME APPEALS REPORTER [CIVIL] PAGE 407.
M/S CHETAK CONSTRUCTION LTD.V/S OM PRAKASH &OTHERS.