Anonymous
05 January 2010 at 19:30
Resp. Sir/ Madam
whether the RTI Act 2005 is applicable to the co-operative sugar factories in Maharashtra?
Thanx n Regards
Anonymous
05 January 2010 at 15:42
Plz.give me the definition of "unregistered sale transaction" in detail, as per legal terminology.
Rajneesh Madhok
05 January 2010 at 14:46
The RTI application had been made and the information collected from the Punjab State Electricity board.
Now the new formula had been made that the case had been filed on the applicant. Kindly suggest what is the way out. Whether the CWP can be filed in High court now as we have prove that from the last two years the money had been deposited in the account of PSEB and there is deficiency on the part of PSEB
Rajneesh Madhok,
B=xxx/63, nehru Nagar,
St. No. 2, Railway Road,
Phagwara (Pb)
In the court of Shri****. PCS, Addl, Civil Judge
(Senior Division), ******
1. U***S/o B**S/o P
2. A***S/o K***S/o B** through attorney H**S/o A** both residents of G**. The : P**, Dist J**
*****Plaintiffs
Versus
1. Ki** S/o N** S/o K**
2. N** S/o K** both residents of Railway Road, Opp ****, P***, Dist K
3. K***E***W**, G.T. Road, G** through K**
4. P.S.E.B. G** through its S.D.O. G***. The, P**. Dist. J**
Defendents
Suit for partition of abadi land with mates and bounds as comprised in Khewat No. **Khatuani**, KHhasra*** situated in the area of village A**, The P**, Dist J**, bounded as:-
East”- G.T. Road,
Wst: Railway Line,
North:- D.E.C.
South: Bulding of Nagar Panchayat, G**. The: P**.Dist J** shown green in the site plan marked by the words ABCD.
IN THE ALTERNATIVE
Suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from erecting/ transferring electic line already existing and is shown in blue colour in the sit plan to the electric poles W,X,Y and Z shown red in the site plan illegally forcibly.
AND
In the alternative
Suit for mandatory injunction directing the defendant no. 4 to remove the electric poles W,X,Y,Z in the site plan.
Sir,
The plaintiff respectfully admits as under:-
1. That the plaintiff No 2, A** S/o K** r/o Vo;;age G, The P**. District J has apponted his son H** as his lawful attorney and the resent suit on behalf of plaintiff is being verified, signed and filed by H** Attorney on behalf of plaintiff No. 2, A**/
2. That originally the property indispute was jointly owned by the plainfiffs, U** * K**, S***. The LRs of Shiv Sngh have sold proerty ot defendant No. 1 & 2 without getting it partitioned and the plaintiff No. 1 &2 are owners of 27 marlas 6 Sarsahi each and the defendeant No 1 &2 are the joint owners of land measuing 27 marlas 5 Sarsahi each and defendant no 3 is in Separate possession of the same and he has constructed house/ building in the said property.
3. That the defendents no 1&2 with connivance of defendant No 4 have tried to transfer the electric line where the electric line is already in existence and shown blue in the site plan and got installed electic poles shown red W,X,Y,Z. The defendents want to transfer the already existing line through these poles i.e. W,X,Y,Z shown red in the site plan illegally , forcibly.
4. That the proerty in suit is still joint and is still to be partitioned. The plaintiffs are in possession of the poperty on the Southern side of the property of the defendants and after partition they are entitled to get 8 marlas. If the defendants succeed to transfer the electric line through the property of the plaintiffs , which may be allotted to the plaintiffs afer partition then value and utitility of the property will be diminished and the plaintiff shall have to suffer an irreparable loss and special inujury which cannot be compensated in terms of money at the later stage.
5. That the plaintiffs approached to the defendants and requested them not to transfer electric line without getting the land partitioned. But the defendants who are of adamant nature refused to do so hend finding no other way the plaintiffs have filed suit for partition by mates and bounds.
6. That the cause of action arose to the plaintiffs and against the defendants about a week agao when the defendant No. 4 has installed poles at point W,X,Y,Z in the land in dispute illegally, forcibly.
7. That no litigation is pending or decided between the same parties to the suit, on the same subject matter by any court of law.
8. That the property in dispute is situated in the area of village A, The: P, District J which is within the civil jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. Therefore the Hon’ble court has got the jurisdiction to entertain, try and decide the present suit.
9. That the value of the suit so far the suit for declaration is concerned is Rs 200/- for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction, and for the relief of relief of mandatory injunction the value of the suit is fixed for Rs 200/- and the value of suit for the purposes of permanent relief is Rs 130/-. Therefore, total court fee i.e. Rs. 20/- +Rs.20/- +Rs 13/-= Rs 53/- is affixed on the plaint.
10. It is therefore prayed that a decree for partition of abadi land with mates and bounds as comprised in Khewat No. ***, Khatauni No.***, situated in the area of village A**. The P**, District J** fully detailed and described in the head note of the plaint, as shown green in the site plan attached as marked by the words ABCD ma kindly be passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants. It is further prayed that a decree for permanent injuction restraining the defendants from erecting/ transferring already existing and is shown in blue colour in the site plan through the electric poles W,X,Y,Z shown red in the site plan illegally , forcibly may kindly be passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants in the interest of justice. It is further prayed that a decree for mandatory injunction directing the defendant No. 4 to remove the electric poles W,X.Y,Z. shown red in the site plan may also kindly be passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in the interest of justice and equity.
Any other relief which has not been specifically prayed for and this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper, the plaintiffs are entitled to, may also kindly be granted in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants in the interst of justice and equity.
Verification Plaintiffs
Verified that that the contents of
The plaint in para No. 1 to 5 are true and correct U***
To the best of my knowledge and lpara no. 6 to 9 are legal A***
And para no. 10 is that of prayer clause. Attorney H****
Verified at P** Through
Dated: *** Sh. I.***Advocate
P
In the court of Sh. H***, PCS, Addl. Civil Judge
(Senior Division), P
1. U** S/oB**S/o P***
2. A**S/o K** S/o B***
Through attorney H** S/o A** both residents of G**, tehsil P, District J
******Plaintiffs/ applicants
Versus
1. K***S/o N** S/o K**
2. N***S/o K** residents of Railway Road, Opposite ******, P***
District K**,
3. P.S.E.B. G***, through its S.D.O Punjab State Electricity Board, G**, Tehsil P**, Dist**J**
*******Defendants/ Respondents
(Suit for partition by metes and bounds of the land in dispute, suit
for mandatory injuction)
Applciation U/S 39 rule 1 &2 read with section 151 CPC for issuance of ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents from erecting/ transferring electric line already existing which is shown in blue colour in the site plan to the electric poles W,X,Y,Z shown red in the site plan attached from the land as comprised in Khewat No. ***Khatauni No ***, Khasra No. *** situated in the area of village A**. Tehsil **. Dist J, bounded as:-
East :-- Road
West:-- Railway Line
Nort:-D.E.C.
South:-Building of Nagar Panchayat, G, T, P, Dist J
As shown in the site plan as green and marked by the words ABCD, illegally, forcibly or through any other way, till the pendency of the main suit.
Sir,
The applicant/ plaintiffs respectfully submit as under:-
1. That the plaintiff/ applicant has today filed above captioned suit in this Hon’ble court, in which no futher date has so far been fixed as yet.
2. That the contents of the plaint may kindly be read as part and parcel of this application for detail of facts and circumstances.
3. That the respondents have started threatening to the applicants that they will illegally, forcibly pass through the electric line through the poles shown W,X,Y,Z in the site plan in green colour and poles shown in red colour in connivance with each other. If the respondents succeed in doing so, then the value and utility of the land as detailed above maintained and in note of the plaint. Application, then the applicants shall have to suffer and irreparable loss and special injury which cannot be compensated in terms of money at the later stage.
4. That the applicants have a good prima facie case and balance of convenience also lines in favour of the applicants and against the respondent.
5. That the provision of issuing the notice to the respondents may also kindly be dispensed with taking in view the urgent nature of the matter under issue.
6. It is therefore prayed that the ad=interim injuntion restraining the respondents from erecting/ transferring electric line already existing which is shown in blue colour in the site plan to the electric poles W,X,Y,Z shown red in the site plan attached from the land as fully detailed in the head note of the application situated in the area of village A**. Tehsil**, ** as shown in the site plan in in green colur and marked by the words ABCD illegally, forcibly or through any other way, till the pendency of the main suit, may kindly be passed in favour of the applicants in the interst of justice.
Verification:- Verified that the contents of the application Plaintiff/ Applicant
Above are ture and correct to the best of knowledge .
Verified at P Through
Sh. I, Advocate
P
Rima
05 January 2010 at 11:59
In the district consumer forum one case filed against me.
I appointed an advocate to defend my case. Regularly paid fees. Judgment passed against me and my advocate got a copy of that.
However my advocate never communicated me that we have lost the case.
Subsequently execution case started but I was unware (later I changed address)about it.
When the Consumer Forum issued warrant I came to know the whole fact but in the mean time one year passed.
I appeared before the forum and applied for certified copy of the judgment of the original case. I applied for bail also.
The forum though granted bail but informed me that on the next date I have to specifically tell the forum that whether I will comply or not on next date that is on 7th January. If I dont then the Forum will proceed wiht trial under section 27 of C.P. Act against me.
Now I have file Appeal in State Commission with condonation of delay petition. Date fixed on 27th January for admisssion.
If on 7th Jan I appear before the Dist. Forum and plead that I have filed Appeal in State Commission and ask the forum to wait till rejection or admission of the appeal, whether the forum will allow me time?
Whether again Forum can issue W/A against me?
Whether the forum can proceed with trial under s.27 of the C.P. Act even if the appeal is pending?
Please guide me what exactly shall I plead before the Dist. Forum on 7th Jan?
Whether I shall suppress the fact that appeal has been filed?
Haider Adv.
04 January 2010 at 19:52
dear seniors,
i appered in a civil suit for the defendant. In this case Plaintiff field an application without any soported affidavit which is necessary for filling Application in civil Procedure so i field an objection against the Apllication on above Mentioned Ground, but court decided the Application in favor of the Applicant, so i want to Know whose remedy availabe against in this Inter locatery Order
Revison / Appeal / Writ
Anonymous
04 January 2010 at 17:45
A decree was passed on dt. 21-02-19985. From the day on wards, i have been defending the case with the other parties for the same property. I want to know that while calculating the limitation period, i think the defending time is to be excluded from the limitation period of 12 years or not.
Chandan Garg
04 January 2010 at 16:14
Whether a steel manufacturing company who took land on lease from the state government under land acquisition act is exempted from payment of property tax ??
Q.2. what is the status for same company in case of the land purchased by it in regard to property tax??
queryking
04 January 2010 at 11:27
Namaskar to everybody,
here is my query,
The 3rd defendant died, his LRs are brought on record, they remained exparte, the 2nd defendant quoting the one of the LR as his witness, can h the 2nd defendant examine other defendant as his witness?
suresh jakhotiya
04 January 2010 at 04:26
Dear Sirs
Can you please give me a citation of amending a Judgement on account of arithmatical mistake by the same court.
Best regards
Suresh
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
cheque bounce for goods purchases
I am an entreprenuer running a furniture store. One of our clients bought some furniture from us and paid us an advance by way of cheque for initial booking of goods.
We made a part delivery of sofas to him against another cheque which was issued by him on his firms name. My goods were delivered to him and subsequently the cheque bounced. Since then the customer is promising to pay the balance but has not paid as yet. In the hope that he will complete the transaction I have not sent him a legal notice. How long can I keep the cheque before I send him a legal notice, as I want it to be the last resort?