Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   20 April 2010 at 10:54

"WIll"


my question to all experts, one of my sister
is planning to challenge "will" left by my mother, rest of us brother and sisters are do not have any doubts (obviously its in our favour), but the sister who is claim'g her right in self earned property of mother, wants to spoil our precious time , as forensic examination takes over an year, one of the witness to will is dead ,now other witness and the deed writer himself is alive ,it's a 35 will year old unregistered will.
how can we save our time. what are legal provisions that can help us , in this regard!

p sushama rajan   20 April 2010 at 10:44

Diishonour of Cheque - Court order not favourable -

Respected Sir,
My father, a senior citizen aged 71 years, lost his civil case against Mr.Pari, who issued two cheques for Rs.11,50.000 which was dishonoured in the year 2003. The case went on from 2004 to 2009, after which the judge dismissed the case. My father solely relied on this money which was his retirement benefit which he gave Mr.Pari. Now he is in a mental agony and is depressed, as he feels that this was the only source of his living. Kindly advise as to what can I do as his only daugher to help him . Your advise is highly valuable
Thanking you
yours sincerely
psushamarajan

Anonymous   20 April 2010 at 10:42

release deed be revoked......!


IS IT POSSIBBLE TO REVOKE RELEASE DEED,FOR RELINQUISHING RIGHTS IN PARENTAL PROPERTY, IF YES, THEN WHAT IS THE PROCESS.....? ALSO, IS THERE ANY TIME LIMITATION FOR REVOKEING RELEASE DEED....?

G. ARAVINTHAN   20 April 2010 at 07:21

Rent Control

A rent control proceedings was initiated by Landlord through his Agent through a Registered Power of Attorney.

The said agent have no knowledge as to the relationship between landlord and tenant. Is the proceedings valid?

G. ARAVINTHAN   20 April 2010 at 07:20

Rent Control proceedings by agent

A rent control proceedings was initiated by Landlord through his Agent through a Registered Power of Attorney.

Wherein the Power Agent died during the pendancy of proceedings.

Is it possible for the Landlord to continue proceedings by appointing a different person as an Agent?

rajesh   20 April 2010 at 00:32

property selling

i m selling my property which is in litigation on AS IS WHERE IS BASIS,purchaser telling me that a case which is in killa court mumbai should handle by me.he is agree to pay compansation if any.actully my devloper was came in agreement with me and he taken some amount from 8 people,i also signed that doccument but he ran away with incomplete building,now he is no motre and property is captured by third person.so now we 5 person are accused .so wt i should write in agreement for my safety.actully that devloper also not paid my amount for which i was made agreement with him.


Anonymous   19 April 2010 at 22:41

kindly advice....!


dear, all,
just want to ask if any suit for claiming share in property by sister is withdrawan in revenue court is eligible to be filed in civil court or not......! kindly , mention relevant section / subsection/ provisions , in this regard.

Anonymous   19 April 2010 at 14:45

impersonation or forgery pl clarify?

Certain tenants have brought up rental which are under valued receipts, claiming that those were issued by the owner's daughter who is not the actual owner.

Owner's daughter states that those signatures do not at all match those of her. She stands by her claim and is contemplating legal action.

My query is Sir,

1. Whether this amounts to Forgery or Impersonation & Forgery

2.The receipts in contention is filed in courts as proof as them being tenants and the owners issuing the same.

3.Does rental receipts issued by other than owner or land lord of the house is legally binding? or

4. Does it stand ground as there is no GPA or written consent to so and owner present in the premises of the rented portion.

Pl specify if there is any Sec or Order in the CPC to substantiate it.


Thanks Sirs.

Rajesh Singh   19 April 2010 at 13:37

Right of Customer

A customer booked product from a shop at half price which was winding up. Later learnt that product is of china made and refuse to accept part of the order. for the whole order part payment is made by the customer for which chacha bill is given by the shopkeeper and warranty is verbal not by the company its only by the dealer and shopkeeper.

What is the Stand of customer can he reject , part of the order.

Can shopkeeper force the customer to take the goods in whole.

Anonymous   19 April 2010 at 11:58

What is the options"D" have?

Respected Experts,

Plz. Give me a suitable solution for the below mentioned problem.

“A” is the Builder and “B” is the land owner. Both of them have executed an un-registered Memorandum for Development Rights on dt. 31-04-2006 for a project, as per the terms and conditions, as mentioned therein. Accordingly the Builder has paid some advance amount to the land owners in this connection. But the said amount has shared by “C”, after their mutual agreement, since the developer has offered to share some extent or partnership in the above project to “C”, as they are business friends.

Later, the said project went in administrative litigations in clearing the file before the Government, the Builder is not interested to continue the same. Towards full and final settlement of his payment, “C” has introduced and offered “D” with 30% of premium in the total project and was not informed about the litigation. Having faith and confidence on “C”, ”D” has invested some amount and settle the issue of the Builder.

After payment made by “D”, the Builder has handed over the Original document ie., Memorandum for Development Rights dt. 31-04-2006 (un-registered) to “D”. The said fact is known to the land owners and “C”.

Now everybody has dropped from the above project. Even now, the land owners or “C” did not come up settlement of the amounts of “D” and simply prolonging the matter without any solution, even after several demands made by “D” either personally or through the mediators.

In this:-

(1) The above said document is not in favour of either “C” or “D”.
(2) “C” also invested some amounts, but no document is in favour.
(3) Now “C” has taken total responsibility in clearing the issue of “D”, but playing game without clearing the issue.
(4) Now how “D” can recover his money from them. He is having only the original document in his possession.