raghavendra
07 May 2010 at 16:56
sir,
1. is grand son or grand daughter can claim the partition over maternal ancesteral property?
2. my problem is one of my friend mother is no more, but her father ( his grand father) has property in bangalore, can my friend ask or file suit for partition against his maternal uncles?
3. in such a case how i can ask the property with his uncles?
3. what is female right over ancesterl property?
4. sir,there any impediment to ask property to the female who married before 1990 ?
5. what will be court fees for partition?
6. what is the court fees for declaration of property?
3. please provide me relevant law and some importnt citation, which would in favour of grandson right over the maternal grand father properties after his mother died.
4. can he get the property?
thank you
pratik
07 May 2010 at 12:18
1)Explain the meaning of forbidden by law, gratuitous act & non - gratuitous act,implied act.
Pls explain me if possible with the examples.
2) Difference between vindictive damages & exemplary damages as per the indian contract act.witht the suitable examples or any case laws.
pratik
07 May 2010 at 12:12
Section 13 & 20 Transfer Of Property ACt, 1882.
Pls explain me the below mentioned para in detail with the easy examples pls experts explain me and if any notes available then pls post it .
Section 13 of the transfer of property act, 1882.
Transfer for benefit of unborn person.- Where, on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created for the benefit of a person not in existence at the date of the transfer, subject to a prior interest created by the same transfer, the interest created for the benefit of such person shall not take effect, unless it extends to the whole of the remaining interest of the transferor in the property.
Section 20 of the transfer of property act, 1882.
When unborn person acquires vested interest on transfer for his benefit.- Where, on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created for the benefit of a person not then living, he acquires upon his birth, unless a contrary intention appears from the terms of the transfer, a vested interest, although he may not be entitled to the enjoyment thereof immediately on his birth.
Meaning of vested interest as per section 20 of the transfer of property act, 1882.
Any case laws than pls put forward.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
Pls explain me.
Anonymous
07 May 2010 at 08:00
sir,
I had been issued three cheques by a courier co. as repayment of the money I had paid them to get their franchisee of which one of the cheques was disbursed while the other two bounced, after chasing the co. they again issued two cheques after deducting Rs 3000 without any reason after a period of six months but this time too the cheques bounced, What legal action can be taken against the co. Are there any ngo who are associated with such problems as I dont't have enough funds to fight back with the co. in a court.
Anandan
06 May 2010 at 22:52
whether maps downloaded from internet like google maps be admissible in the court of law as evidence, for showing the boundary, area development, etc. whether there is any recent case laws relating to electronic media.
Sanjay
06 May 2010 at 17:18
I applied for a Car Loan, and my bank after a few days, showed me a CIBIL report, having 3.5lac of Personal Loan, (which I had not taken at all), and furhter there was 2 credit card mentioned in my name, (which was again not availed by me). I did pay and avail my report (I got it on 15th March 2010) to check the Banks name etc, and then I communicated with the Banks, and each back replied to me back saying that they have corrected the mistake. ( Communication includes emailing to the nodal officer, and even sending a legal notice).
Further to the communication by the banks, I asked for a new CIBIL repor on 27th April 2010, and I have not got the report tilldate.
Now when one of the banks, sent a proof ( they generated my credit report) on 6th May 2010, to my surprise, I see that there has been a 10lac & 1.7lac written off amount which was not there in the previous report generated on 15th March. It says that an amount of 10lac is written off form Credit Card, and 1.7lac of Auto Loan. I have no clue on how banks are reprotign this to CIBIL, where in I have not even availed of the CC or auto loan that they are mentioning.
Please advice on how do I go about getting these sorted out. I am based out of Bangalore. Is there any legal expert who would handle this to get these reporting cleared
Sanjay
Manish Singh
06 May 2010 at 14:50
Dear All,
please enlighten me on this aspect of litigation -
if the High Court mistakenly appoints a person as a valuer of some property treating him as a C.A. but as a matter of fact, that person has renounced his CA authorisation and is not entitled to sign as a CA, then which application should be made to the HC for rectification of the said Order.
will it be u/151 CPC?
also, what should be the format of the application since that person must be the applicant then how it should be made.
Please enlighten.
Anonymous
06 May 2010 at 13:15
Respected Experts,
I want to know the clarifications with regard to the following.
1. SLP (Special Leave petition).
In this the Honourable Supreme court granted Status-quo at the time of filing of a case. Now it is coming for hearing. Even if the petitioner have legal points, can it be closed at this stage. The order in SLP is final or not.
2. Leave Granted. What it means.
3. Civil Appeal. (When the SLP converted into Civil Appeal) At what circumstances.
4. So what is difference between SLP and Civil Appeal.
Please clarify my doubt.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Change of OP 2(MC of CHS) pending hearing
I have filed a case against a builder and office bearers of CHS in District Consumer Forum and the matter is posted for submission of written arguements by OP2 ie CHS. However, recently the General Body elected new MC and hence change in Office Bearers, who had originally submitted evidence on oath before Ho'nble Forum. My query is that if the new office beares are representing in place of earlier people, can I object of their authenticity on grounds like proper resolution of AGM, approval from the Registrar, submission of Indemnity Bond or for any other technical ground ?