Anonymous
24 July 2010 at 15:44
Sir,
I was having ICICI Bank Credit Card and was having the some amount indue in 2006.The collection agent coming every month and regularly collecting the Credit Card Due Amount.He asked me to settle it and told me to pay 6000 rupees for closing of account.I paid the amount and the agent was written the backside that the "Amount Collected towards the closing of A/C.".
The above thing was happened in February'2006.And I was informed to their department regarding that.They did n't taken any action on the agent and now harassing me like any thing.
Now ICICI Bank Credit Card Department is harrassing me for payment of the amount due again( Rs:58000) and they are saying the amount was due and account was not closed.
I already submitted the receipt copy of the payment at their office in hyderabad.
Now ICICI Bank Legal Dept is saying whatever the agent written on the receipt does not have the validity and he was told me that sending the legal notice.
How to proceed further on this.
Thanks
Anonymous
24 July 2010 at 15:26
Respected Experts,
My land was encroached by the neighbor, as per the suggestion of local lawyer my father reported it in Police and filed a suit of u/s 144 and 145 Cr.P.C in SDM Court which was closed without any judgment since no one took interest.. After some yrs. he didn’t pursued the case due to health reasons. None of my brothers and sisters lives here except my retd. Father. Now to recover the encroached portion of land back, as per suggestion of Hon. Experts of LCI and local lawyers I am filling civil suit for Declaration with recovery of possession and mandatory injunction. So, is it necessary to mention or give reference about the proceedings and incidence of u/s 144 and 145 Cr.P.C in SDM Court in the plaint or will be discussed in argument if he raises that issue? We both have purchased from the same seller and lands situates in the same plot (his area in his sale deed is 0.075 Acre but after encroachment he is in 0.09 Acre and mine is rest of the land i.e. 0.32 acres but reduced to around 0.30), so how it will be decided that he has done encroachment?
Plz. Suggest.
Thanks and regards.
Anonymous
24 July 2010 at 15:22
Respected sirs,
A public officer while passing order and validating a report of his subordinate, acted maliciously, when the person refused to entertain him. The manner and method as well as circumstances itself proves the intention. I have the documentary proofs. Rest cross examination of public servants will do. Their report contradicts earlier report on the same matter submitted by same public servants 10 months earlier. Also they have manipulated the record and have mentioned wrong dates of the event, at one date that officer even had not joined the office. Here do I need or is it mandatory to enlist the name of witnesses in the complaint itself? I fear they may influence the witnesses, by taking advantages of his official position; also no one is ready to depose against the officer.
Can both the writ and criminal case be filed concurrently or maintainable? I have filed the regular appeal in higher authority, since HC is very far from here. But I will try to file writ if allowed.
Plz suggest.
Thank u all with regds.
Anonymous
24 July 2010 at 13:41
Sir, my mother,younger brother and myself(elder)share a piece of land.Before the demise of my younger brother he had transfered his share to his wife.Thereafter,she constructed a houz in the front portion of land and had been residing there. I alongwith my mother stay at hyderabad.My and my brothers share is 175acres and mother's is 75acres.I want to dispose my and my mother's share but since the share is not demarcated she claims the front portion to be hers and refuses to go back since there is a variation in prices of front and behind portion.please guide if partition suit will be helpful and who could get the front share?
Anonymous
24 July 2010 at 13:06
dear sir
i have purchase a land with a power attoney holders after the sale deed now the owner say power attoney is forgery filed a civil suit and as take a injunction and a declaration will it affect my sale deed
what is declaration and it is a exparty order
pratik
24 July 2010 at 00:28
Advanatges & Disadvanatges of filing of insolvency petition & the time limit to file it. Also who can file it.
A Book On which detail detail detail detail detail detail detail detail detail detail detail detail detail detail detail detail Information is given on Provisional Insolvency act, 1920. PLS
Thanks In Adavnce.
pratik
24 July 2010 at 00:21
If the decree or order or judgment of the court is disobeyed by the opposite party who has to obey than the opposite can file a execution petition with 12 years as per the specifi relief act OR he can file a (contempt petition or contempt writ )as per the contempt of court act. Also tell me whether contempt petition is proper or execution petition is proper or what is more advantage(S)& if than also the order or judgment or decree are not obeyed than the penalty provision or any prosectuion (JAIL TERM) is there or not pls tell me with the section.
In short the after passing the judgemnt if the parties does not obey than what are the penalties or any kind of punishment. Also what is time time limit to file a contempt petition or writ.
Thanks In Advance.
kamal dhawan
23 July 2010 at 18:05
Recently Govt. of U.P. released a list of nearly 1042 . Doctors whose services have been terminated since they were absconding / absent unauthorisedly for a long time and not traceabe. Being untraceable, disciplinary action could not be taken against them and fresh recruitment could not be made. Therefore in consultation with U.P.Public Service Commission and approval of Hon\'ble Governor in exercise of power under article 311(2) their services have been terminated by Govt. of U.P. I am a consultant Gynaecologist and a class I officer working in U.P.Govt. PMHS and posted in a District Hospital . I am a postgraduate (Gold Medalist) and have rendered uninterrupted service for 30 years and served in many cities and hospitals of the Govt. My name is also included in the list of terminated doctors. While I have made representations to concerned authorities and the outcome is awaited, meanwhile prominent dailies of Allahabad and Kanpur have sensationalised the news of my termination which has added to my grief. I suspect that my inclusion in the list of terminated doctors is not an ordinary mistake but a pre meditated action of my superior officer and others acting in consert with her/him by giving false information or specious feedback when information about missing doctors was being collected. Kindly advise whether a writ petition against my wronful termination could give me following relief: 1.A compensation equivalent to my remaining service of about 5 years or more? 2.An order for an enquiry to fix liability on those who have furnished false information or specious feedback knowing it to be false. 3.Voluntary Retirement from Service if I choose to demand. Regards - View Group
Legal Fighter
23 July 2010 at 17:50
Can execution u/s 27 of CPA be filed for the second time if it was not decided on merits for the first time?
Details of the case are :
I filed execution petition before consumer forum without mentioning any section and prayed for execution of order alongwith penalty. While deciding, the forum just passed order u/s 25.
Now I want to file seperate execution application u/s 27 of the CPA. Will this be maintainable?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
The decisions of the Superior Courts of Justice in England .
The decisions of the Superior Courts of Justice in England are authoritative precedents recognized by English Law. In our country, Article 141 of the Constitution says that the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India. By this, it is made clear that all courts in India are bound to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court even though the said decisions are contrary to decisions of the House of Lords or of the Privy Council. Privy Council decisions are binding on the High Court so long as the Supreme Court does not overrule them. [PANDURANG KALU Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (AIR 2003 SC 733)]. The Supreme Court under Article 141 of the Constitution is enjoined to declare law. The law declared by the Supreme Court is the law of the land. It has been held in the case reported in BENGAL IRON CORPORATION Vs. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER [1994 (1) Supp. SCC 310] that no doubt a statute is binding, but it is the satute as interpreted by the highest court which is binding on all other courts.
Query : What do u mean by House of Lords & Privy Council in detail because this words are also used under the indian evidence act . So pls elaborate it if possible with the example(S).
Becasue as per the abovementioned article the law of House of Lords & Privy Council also binds to the Supreme court it means it is the highest one among the indian constitution of india & also the apex court.
So pls tell me the meaning along with keeping in mind the indain evidence act also.
Thanks In Advance.