Jasmeetsingh
26 October 2010 at 23:29
Sir,
With the reference to the above subjected my partition case is subjudice before the court of law, and DVA proceeding is also sub judice between my mother & mother .My grandfather has produce a will deed executed by my great grand father in his name. Whether a immovable property acquired by a person through a Will Deed, becomes the sole owner of the property; or in the other word after execution of th will deed of great grand father does the said property remains as ancestral property or becomes a self acquired property of my grandfather for which he is entitled?
With a humble hope of clarfication at the earliest!
Niranjan Nayak
26 October 2010 at 21:48
Sirs,
There is a law that one can gift an ancestral property for a pious purpose. One has gifted his ancestral property to his adopted son. He has a natural daughter who has challenged the gift. The same quantity of ancestral property in the same revenue area is remained for her. but she demands that particular property. On the other hand in the gift deed it is mentioned that the doner donated the land to the adopted son without money in sake of love and affection with a hope that the son would serve them at old age and do all the the son is in the possesion of the lands and has been giving revenue for last 6 years.The same has been muted and patta has been correctedin the client's name. the adopted son has converted the agriculture land to Home stated land.
Can it be treated as pious purpose?
Can the daughter get the share from this particular land even after the change of the kissam(type) of the land to Homestated?
What other steps can be taken to protect the land?
What should the client do not to give the land to the natural daughter?
What other judicial procedure is there?
For your better perusal sirs, both adoptive parents are in favour of my client and even not interested to give that land to their daughter, what best they can do at their end for their adopted son?
Please guide me.
Anonymous
26 October 2010 at 21:24
author : Anonymous
Posted On
26 October 2010
In continuation to my above query....
Dear Sirs,
It is mentioned as Witness summons under form 33.
Complainant CW 1 (Evidence is recorded.)
mother in law CW 4
Husband CW 5 &
myself CW6.
Please inform How do I approach the court in remaining absent & am ready to appear whenever court asks.
What is point in making all people wait & waste resources.
Regards.
Anonymous
26 October 2010 at 21:09
Hi,
My query is regarding Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act,1988.
Can any person claim his right for any such transaction done before this act was introduced?
Thanks...
Anup Hadgaonkar
26 October 2010 at 19:54
the insurance company cheted with me, can i file the complaint before the C. Forum
Anup Hadgaonkar
26 October 2010 at 19:48
'A' executed Agreement to sale in favour of 'B' in the year of 1995. But dueto non compliyencess of document from 'A', 'B' is uable to purches the same. in the year of 2005, 'A' transfer the same to the 'C' back of 'B'. that 'B' comes to know the same trancfer, in 2009, and immedieatly 'B' file the suit for specific performance of contract.
So my Q.1 is, wether the suit is within the limitation.
Q.2 is, when the limitetion period starts and ends?
Q.3 is non compliencess of required document frome the 'A', is the foult of 'B'.
Q.4 is, upto what extent the same agreement will in execution?
Anonymous
26 October 2010 at 19:43
sir,
The facts of the case are that we are residing in a flat and are one of the owners. One Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao who are co-owners of an flat who are having a duplex apartment wanted to extend their duplex house by extending into the common area and they approached the association of flat owners on 31st january 2010 asking for their permission.
After several delibrations some of the owners objected to it. But they started constructing the illegal and unauthroised structure on 5th Feb 2010. We approached the Ghmc and complained to them about the illegal construction.
The Ghmc issued a notice U/s.452A of HMC act on 9th Feb 2010 to stop further construction. They did not heed to the notice and we gave further complaints to the Ghmc but no further action was taken, as they are close to one of the ministers and the minister has asked the Ghmc not to intervene. The minister also came to our flats and tried to influence some of the owners.
So, some of us approached the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh and asked the court to intervene and stop further construction and demolish the constructed portion. The Hon'ble High Court on 5th March issued a stay to stop further construction and asked the official rspondents the GHMC to see to that no further construction is made pending disposal of the writ petition. An wire order was also given to them on the same day.
But, Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao ignored the order and continued the work and our representations to the Ghmc that there is a violation of the court orders was not attended to.
So, we filed a contempt case against Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao and the Ghmc.
Meanwhile, Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao applied for regularisation of the illegaly constructed structure under U/s 455/A of HMC act 1955.
But the Ghmc rejected the proposal as it does no satisfy the rules in force anditimated it to them on 21st May 2010. As Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao did not comply to removing the illegal structure the Ghmc issued a notice U/S 636 of HMC act 1955 to them on 1st June 2010.
Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao then approached the Hon'ble Junior civil judge,city civil courts against the GHMC by hiding the facts and obtained a stay order against the demolition. The standing counsel of the Ghmc got it vacated on 2nd July 2010 after submitting the relevant matterial papers.
On 5th July 2010 when the contempt case came for hearing before the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao denied that they have constructed after the court order but the Ghmc represented by the Asst. City Planner in their counter affadavit submitted that there was a violation of the orders and that they would immediatley get the illegal and unauthroised construction demolished. The Hon'ble judge posted the case for further hearing on 26th July 2010.
Again in the first week of July 2010, Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao approached the IIIrd Addl. Chief judge, city civil courts seeking a status Quo against the orders of the VIth Junior civil judge who has vacated the stay in favour of the Ghmc. The IIIrd Addl. chief judge issued the staus Quo.
The Ghmc standing counsel are either not concerned or able to get the status quo vacated till date. Everytime it comes for hearing the case is getting posted for another date for reasons best known to the judge.
When we ask our lawyers whom we have engaged to argue in the High Court to move a motion they say that the High Court is not taking up any motions on a contempt case.
When we approached the Zonal Commissioner GHMC, he is advising us to get implicated int he case which is under the IIIrd Addl. chief Judge, city civil courts and also to put a further contempt case against Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao for seeking relief in the lower court when the matter is pending in the High Court.
Is it no the duty of the standing counsel of the Ghmc to get the status quo vacated. We are perplexed by the attitude of the Ghmc who have given it in writting in the Hon'ble High Court that they would demolish the illegal construction and the subsequent actions of their standing counsel.
Please advice.
thank you
Anonymous
26 October 2010 at 19:22
sir,
The facts of the case are that we are residing in a flat and are one of the owners. One Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao who are co-owners of an flat who are having a duplex apartment wanted to extend their duplex house by extending into the common area and they approached the association of flat owners on 31st january 2010 asking for their permission.
After several delibrations some of the owners objected to it. But they started constructing the illegal and unauthroised structure on 5th Feb 2010. We approached the Ghmc and complained to them about the illegal construction.
The Ghmc issued a notice U/s.452A of HMC act on 9th Feb 2010 to stop further construction. They did not heed to the notice and we gave further complaints to the Ghmc but no further action was taken, as they are close to one of the ministers and the minister has asked the Ghmc not to intervene. The minister also came to our flats and tried to influence some of the owners.
So, some of us approached the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh and asked the court to intervene and stop further construction and demolish the constructed portion. The Hon'ble High Court on 5th March issued a stay to stop further construction and asked the official rspondents the GHMC to see to that no further construction is made pending disposal of the writ petition. An wire order was also given to them on the same day.
But, Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao ignored the order and continued the work and our representations to the Ghmc that there is a violation of the court orders was not attended to.
So, we filed a contempt case against Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao and the Ghmc.
Meanwhile, Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao applied for regularisation of the illegaly constructed structure under U/s 455/A of HMC act 1955.
But the Ghmc rejected the proposal as it does no satisfy the rules in force anditimated it to them on 21st May 2010. As Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao did not comply to removing the illegal structure the Ghmc issued a notice U/S 636 of HMC act 1955 to them on 1st June 2010.
Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao then approached the Hon'ble Junior civil judge,city civil courts against the GHMC by hiding the facts and obtained a stay order against the demolition. The standing counsel of the Ghmc got it vacated on 2nd July 2010 after submitting the relevant matterial papers.
On 5th July 2010 when the contempt case came for hearing before the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao denied that they have constructed after the court order but the Ghmc represented by the Asst. City Planner in their counter affadavit submitted that there was a violation of the orders and that they would immediatley get the illegal and unauthroised construction demolished. The Hon'ble judge posted the case for further hearing on 26th July 2010.
Again in the first week of July 2010, Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao approached the IIIrd Addl. Chief judge, city civil courts seeking a status Quo against the orders of the VIth Junior civil judge who has vacated the stay in favour of the Ghmc. The IIIrd Addl. chief judge issued the staus Quo.
The Ghmc standing counsel are either not concerned or able to get the status quo vacated till date. Everytime it comes for hearing the case is getting posted for another date for reasons best known to the judge.
When we ask our lawyers whom we have engaged to argue in the High Court to move a motion they say that the High Court is not taking up any motions on a contempt case.
When we approached the Zonal Commissioner GHMC, he is advising us to get implicated int he case which is under the IIIrd Addl. chief Judge, city civil courts and also to put a further contempt case against Mrs & Mr.V.S.Rao for seeking relief in the lower court when the matter is pending in the High Court.
Is it no the duty of the standing counsel of the Ghmc to get the status quo vacated. We are perplexed by the attitude of the Ghmc who have given it in writting in the Hon'ble High Court that they would demolish the illegal construction and the subsequent actions of their standing counsel.
Please advice.
thank you
raghavendra
26 October 2010 at 18:10
sir,
i am residing in house since 50 years but land is in some other person name ,i am paying tax to muncipality for this house ,but nothing mention in the katha about this house , now that land owner sold that house to other , this new owner is also not inturrupting for my residence , now how can i have the titte over the property
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
landlord forced to leave the house without any notice.
can i file a FIR AFTER TWO MONTHS, against my landlord, who forced me to leave the house, he also threatned me, and increased the rent without any notice. what should i do against him.