rajashekhar
02 September 2019 at 00:03
dear sir planitiff filed suit for bare injunction for perpectual along with temporary injunctionwith allegation of interference in possession and court granted temporary injunction in favour of plaintiff .now can defendent restrain construction of plaintiff with a prayer for amendment of temporary order already issued for status quo till disposal of suit with a direction to plaintiff not to alter property by construction by filing application under order 39 rule 1a
rajashekhar
02 September 2019 at 00:01
dear sir planitiff filed suit for bare injunction for perpectual along with temporary injunctionwith allegation of interference in possession and court granted temporary injunction in favour of plaintiff .now can defendent restrain construction of plaintiff with a prayer for amendment of temporary order already issued for status quo till disposal of suit with a direction to plaintiff not to alter property by construction by filing application under order 39 rule 1a
Banuvara Raja
01 September 2019 at 16:27
I will be getting married shortly. But there is a problem. Its the to be mother in law. She said she wants to test me. Earlier to this her daughter said the same and she ended up having sxe with me. Now I am in doubt, my to be mother in law also wants to have sxe with me? In this case how to handle this? Please guide. Many thanks.
Anonymous
31 August 2019 at 12:22
I am from Assam, my tenant has been staying for last 30 yr a shop rent.
On the heart of main city paying rent only RS 1500per month and agreement is doing for 1Year.
I have asked to increase it to Rs 4000pm and renewal of agreement within 11 month.
But the tenant has not agreed and threaten me to do what can I do.
So i want to know what are the option available before me??
Hussain
31 August 2019 at 11:40
I had taken a loan from fullerton India indore. I defaulted on emi from last 6 months due to my mom hospitalisation. They then initiated a loan settlement process of 44000 in which I paid 20000 but was unable to pay the remaining balance amount. Now they say that 20000 will be put in penalty amount and a legal procedure would be initiated in Delhi High court and police would arrest me.
Anonymous
31 August 2019 at 03:36
वादी ने विनिर्दिष्ट अनुतोष अधिनियम की धारा 6 के तहत कब्जा प्राप्ति का वाद प्रस्तुत किया और विकल्प में भी स्वत्व के आधार पर कब्जा प्राप्ति का अनुतोष माँगा, विचारण में वादी ने अपने बयानो में बेदखली की दिनाँक वाद पत्र में अभिलिखित बेदखली की दिनाँक से भिन्न बताई, विचारण न्यायालय ने वादी का धारा 6 का वाद तो मियाद बहार मानकर खारिज कर दिया परन्तु वादी के पक्ष में वैकल्पिक अनुतोष के लिये कब्जा प्राप्ति की डिक्री जारी कर दी । (मैं प्रतिवादी हुँ )
निम्न बिन्दुऔं पर citation नहीं मिल रही है�
(1) धारा 5 व धारा 6 अलग अलग उपचार प्रदान करती है इसलियें दोनो धाराऔं को एक ही वाद में संयॊंजित नहीं किया जा सकता है ।
(2) न्यायालय अभिवचनों से भिन्न, बयान में बताई गई बेदखली की दिनाँक को cause of action नहीं मान सकता है ।
(3) धारा 6 व 5 के तहत संयुक्त रूप से दायर किये गये किसी वाद में यदि वादी धारा 6 के वाद में असफल हाे जाये ताे उसके पक्ष में धारा 5 के तहत स्वत्व के आधार पर भी काेई डिक्री पारित नहीं की जा सकती है और यदि उक्त प्रकार की काेई डिक्री पारित की गई है ताे वाे सही नहीं है।
Banuvara Raja
30 August 2019 at 23:23
Instead of paying at lower court where warrant is issued our advocate has gone and paid in state commission. We hv paid half which is 1 lakh. Rest of the amount should we pay? Rest of amount is 1 lakh.
mahender
30 August 2019 at 08:49
Hello Sir,
Original suit filed @ District and Sessions Court, Hyderabad and case is pending since 14-03-2019, its been 5 months now and we have not granted Injection order temporary or permanent. Case status still shows at summons. Please suggest what to be done to get Immediate Injection or some sort of relief to stop illegal possession/construction from respondents.
Case History: We petitioner are legal heirs of said property which belongs to our Grand Father/ Father, respondents have created a illegal decree with fake signatures of our ancestors, now legal heirs of respondents have made development agreement with builder.
Appreciate expert advice and inputs of above case to get Injection order ASAP
regards,
Mahender
Neelang Shah
29 August 2019 at 13:52
in my society in Mumbai car pARKING SLOTS HAVE BEEN ALLOTED ALONG WITH FLATS AND REGISTERED IN THE FLAT DOCUMENTS.
sO FAR NO CARGES WERE LEVIED for parking. The society hhas now come out with a notice that it has been decided in the MC that for second car the society shall charge Rs.1000/- per month. No charges for 1 car.
I have a letter from from one of the owners that he has allowed me to park my second car in his parking as he does on t have a car.
Can the society charge me for parking my second car in the other owners car parking
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Writ pettion in high court
My father has a property.Two tenant is there.Eviction case is running
for both case.Both tenant have made construction extended to PWD area.
We have done so far is
1)Sumitted 3 lettet to local municipality
2)144 from District court
3)GD to Local Police station
4)RTI to PWD , asking they have issued permission for this or not.
PWD says , they have not issued any permission
While the case is pending , one of the Tenant break the wall and occupied and Extra room.
Another Tenant ,Open old wooden window and Door of the exiting house and block the portion with
Brisks and concreted.
My father want to revert this property revert as it was.
Can i file a single writ petition asking
1)Order municipality to Break illegal construction.
2)Oder Tenant to release extra occupied room.
3)Place the old wooden window and Door as it was.