prem
03 March 2012 at 18:10
I had issue 2 cheque of re 50000 & 100000 to a company on 17/11/11 and 19/11/11 Respectively.Due to some finiancial problem boath chque return.I had made a payment of Rs 20000 by cash and Rs 50000 by cheque on 19/01/12 and 10/02/12 (I had the recipt of 2nd party which i pay.)Now the 2nd party send me notice for cheque return of Rs 50000 & 100000 please tell me what i do ? i pay him 80000 the rest amount or will i have to pay the payment of Rs 150000.
Prem
9934366606
R.Sai Krishnan
03 March 2012 at 13:31
respected Experts
would be obliged if the experts can provide me checklist and the documentation for the registration of co-operative housing society
Poonam
03 March 2012 at 12:28
can any pls tell is there any case law related to section 201 of companies act 1956 where directors are held liable for gross neglingence pls its urgent
Prithviraj
02 March 2012 at 01:10
I am Civil Engineering Graduate, I have 15 years of Experience in Construction field both in execution and design. I am Registered as PWD Class 1 civil contractor for 7 years, can i register in the same department as Consulting Engineer.
Advocate Rajamahendra Varma P
01 March 2012 at 22:45
Wrong post. Purpose solved. Thanks.
B@75BHAIBABU
01 March 2012 at 19:41
sir
i sent a email to a physiotherapist company about their products.they sent product along with their cost through email.as i liked one product whichwas about 36000 but not within my budget i replied-sir i wish to purchase the product @20000s.if possible please reply.company head replied me-you are a drunkard shameless and workless timewaster.sir as i am hurt i wish to take legal action against him.is it possible?if yes how and under which law
i shall remaimn obliged if i may kindly be replied
VIVEK SINGH
01 March 2012 at 11:38
Dear sir,
what is the difference between Ist party insurance and 3rd party insurance of a scooter.
Thanks!
Pi
29 February 2012 at 23:09
Hi Experts,
I need your expert advice and suggestions.
I have an contract in my employment letter on which I had signed while joining my current employer in 2007:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In consideration of his/her employment with the Company, the receipt of salary and other employment benefits from the Company and other good and valuable consideration and for the reasons set out in clause 5 hereinabove, the Employee, during his/her employment with the Company and for a period of three years after he/she ceases to be an employee of the Company for any reason whatsoever, shall not,
(i) take up employment with any other person, firm, company, body corporate or organization of any other kind whatsoever, engaged in or proposed to be engaged in any activity.
(ii) involve himself/herself directly or indirectly, alone or in association with others, whether as principal officer, sole proprietor, director, agent, partner, joint venturer investor, lender, lessor, consultant, advisor or otherwise or have an interest, in any business,
(iii) carry on either by himself/herself or in association with any other person any business or be associated in any manner with any business, which in the opinion of the Company, is similar to or competitive with that carried by the Company. Such opinion of the Company shall be final conclusive and binding on the Employee."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does this mean after termination or leaving current employer I cannot join any client with which i worked during current employment ? I had an offer from one of the client, proposed work will not be in the same business line. Will it be legal ?
Please advice.
Thanks
Pi
Bhawani Mahapatra
29 February 2012 at 17:48
What is the difference between LICENSE & LEAVE AND LICENSE ? Pl. elaborate with reference to sections of Laws.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Msme act 2006
if A is giving a supply contract order to B. A and B are government undertaking establishments, B in turn add 4 private firms as constrium members and given the supply order equally to 4 firms and all the firms are indicated in the purchase order, Now there is a delay in payment in the contract. one of the constrium member say x is now filing delayed payment interest under msme act 2006 with first respondant as B and second respondent as A.
All cheque payments given by A is only to B. Under the circumstances , is it correct whether adding second respondent as A is legally correct?