mohan sehgal
19 May 2014 at 21:06
Due to working place bootlenecks...I had to rent-in a working shed nearby my parent registered unit to comply with fullfillment of orders...Raw material for necesarry processing etc. are sent to the second registerd primeses and then returned back to the main parent-unit for further processing etc.s etc. and finally cleared after paying approprirate excise duty... whether the IInd unit file any Excise Return although It is keeping all appropriate Inward/Outward records
amar
19 May 2014 at 11:29
If one is starting private locker business where people can keep their valuables/important documents
Is there any need to take permission from RBI ???
Thanks in Advance
pctulsian
18 May 2014 at 11:46
WHAT IS THE POSITION OF BUYER OF A PROPERTY (NOT-MORTGAGED AS PART OF GUARANTEE) OF A GUARANTOR-
1.if he has not received any notice of recovery from the bank
2.if he has simply received notice of recovery from the bank
3.if he has received notice of recovery from the bank under SARFAESI ACT
4.if he has received notice of recovery from the bank under DRT ?
pctulsian
18 May 2014 at 11:10
WHAT IS BUYER'S POSITION WHO PURCHASED HOUSE(NOT MORTGAGED AS PART OF GUARANTEE) FROM A GUARANTOR TO WHOM NOTICE OF RECOVERY FROM BANK HAS ALREADY BEEN SERVED IN RESPECT OF A DEBT DUE FROM A PRINCIPAL DEBTOR ?
Sanjeev Hota
17 May 2014 at 23:05
Mr Shyamsundar is partner in a firm with Mr Harish. His partner Mr Harish, took a vehicle loan from Tata Capitals to purchase a SUV vehicle. Mr Harish who had purchased the vehicle has not been able to pay instalments overdue for one year now.
1. Can Tata Capitals recover the loan taken by Mr Harish from his partner Mr Shyamsunadar?
2. What action can Tata Capitals take to recover the loan from Mr Harish?
3. Can a case be booked against Mr Harsish by Tata Capital (if yes what kind and which sections)
4. Is Mr Shyamsunadar in anyway liable as regards the liability of Mr Harish with Tata Capitals
Sonali
16 May 2014 at 10:50
We have filed an petition under section 397 & 398, and want to withdraw the petition, the bench officer has asked to file an application under unconditional withdrawal. I want to know the format in which the application will be file. kindly advise about the format. thanks
somesh
14 May 2014 at 19:04
Dear Experts
Bankers has issued notice in paper for sale of property in e - auction for next month.
please suggest how to stop or whether we can take stay from court how much charges shall advocates charge for the same.
please help i m in great difficulty.
Member (Account Deleted)
13 May 2014 at 11:53
Under RTI Act 2005 I had submitted a query on providing details of the customers who were the beneficiaries of Rs 90,000.00 hacked from my pension acct. They are known customers of their the same bank in around their head office at Mumbai. Info was denied stating it pertains to info on third parties. I appealed to their first appellate auth. They upheld the CPIO's reply. Both the officer are from the same office i.e Zonal Office of the bank at Hyderabad where as the concerned Br also located here at Secunderabd, AP.
My question is to whom should I file my second appeal? to the State Info or Central Info Commission?
Member (Account Deleted)
12 May 2014 at 20:46
31. Recovery/Refund of overpayment of pension to the Government Account.
(Ref. DGBA. GAD. No.H-10450/45.03.001/2008-09 dated June 1, 2009 and DGBA. GAD. No. H-2434/ 45.05.031/ 2009-10 dated September 15, 2009)
Government of India have advised us that the over payments of pension made by the banks are not credited back to Government account by the banks in lump sum but are remitted in installments as and when recovered from the pensioner. As this causes loss to the Government, all agency banks have been advised that whenever any excess / overpayment is detected the entire amount thereof should be credited to the Government account in lump sum immediately. We have reiterated instructions issued vide our circular dated April 18, 1991 and June 1, 2009 for recovery of excess payments and lump sum refund of excess/ overpayments respectively.
Would you please explain "As this causes loss to the Government, all agency banks have been advised that whenever any excess / over payment is detected the entire amount thereof should be credited to the Government account in lump sum immediately"
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Fema-fdi
Dear Friends, first of all I want to confirm the existing FDI limit in retail. As per my knowledge the same is as under: 1. Single Brand retail: 100 FDI allowed(49% sutomatic route in excess of 49% with Central Govt. Multiple Brand Retail- No FDI is allowed even with Govt. approval. Now my query is: A Ltd deals in whole sale trade and has FRI of about 30%. It wants to operate in retail sector with multiple brands but can'nt do retail sale under FDI policy. However A ltd has a private company in the same gropu in which there is no FDI.But Directors and Indian shareholders are same in both the company. Can this Private company can do retail/online/e commece business with customers directly after buying the goods from A Ltd. as its wholesale/distributor.Please advise. Thansk
& Regards, P.C. Joshi