Dear Sir,
I am planning to buy Resale Under Construction Property (3 BHK Apartment) in Gurgaon. I am buying the apartment from the agreement holder (buyer) of the original allottee (which means on my other side - i am signing off the sub agreement)
Example : Original Allottee/Seller (OA) Signed/Entered the Agreement to Sell(ATS) with Mr X & on the basis there ATS i am signing/entering the Sub ATS with Mr X for the purchase of same property.
This property is not transfered in the name of Mr. X yet & Mr X is not is Legal Owner of the said property but in his agreement with Original Allottee, its clearly mentioned being an property investor he can sell this property further & takes sales consideration value from prospective buyer (i.e me in this situation).
Please Suggest me is the Sub - Agreement to Sell valid in Court if be needed wherein Mr X is a Agreement Holder of Original Allottee ?
Please Reply Soon,
Regds
Gaurav Marwah
durga
21 April 2013 at 19:51
I am a management student and require your help in my academic project. I would like to know what are the laws to punish in case of non compliance with anti money laundering guidelines in Banks as per banking regulation act or any other act if existing.
Thank you for the help rendered.
Greetings,
My father was expired in 22-OCT-2010, and on compassionate grants I got a govt job as Junior Assistant in the same Panchayat Raj Dept,Andhra Pradesh on 30-05-2012.
In 2006 my father has faced a disciplinary action for not having supervision on his staff who misappropriated panchayat funds which was under verification since then, recently in month of March-2013 , I received a notice from District Panchayat Officer , so as I was a heir , I have to pay the half of the misappropriated amount.
All things like Pension etc etc where passed in last year only.
And most importantly in which category this case falls under, Civil Case or Constitutional case???
bnick
21 April 2013 at 17:20
We want to put a commode [toilet) in the house. Do we need to give money to the landlords for putting up a coomode ? Our floor landlord is separate and the the ground floor is seperate.
respected, thanks for replying to all my previous queries.
now, i am representing a 68 year old woman . we have filed an application under DVact for recovery of due maintenance amount. similarly, we claim in it an enhancement of maintenance amount, as the respondent husband gets 2 pensions per month respectively rs.5000/ each.we prayed that a maintenance amount should be directly deducted from the pension accounts of respondents and will be credited to applicants account.we seek the directions of the hon'ble court to the concerned pension department and bank.now, my query is whether the hon'ble court has such powers under the DV act to pass an order directing deduction of maintenance amount directly from the respondents pension account? if yes, under which provision? please reply. thank you!
narayan sharma
21 April 2013 at 10:50
Is in the court room any witness or any person can join the hearing with revolver when revolver beared person or witness come in front of p o and accused gives the information to p o than what effect must be in the eye of law.
This is a query related to non-supply of information sought under RTI. The PIO of ordnance factory board Calcutta was approached under RTI for certain information but he failed to provide information. The appellate authority was approached. He too failed to provide information. A second RTI was addressed on a slightly different matter to PIO of the ordnance factory board Calcutta. This too has not been replied. Lodging a complaint with CIC i.e second appellate authority is itself a very time-consuming process . Sometimes CIC attends to complaint/appeal after a period of two years or more. Apart from the usual mechanism of making second appeal to the CIC, there is is also an alternate provision of giving notice under section 80 CPC to the concerned public authority through concerned secretary in the concerned ministry in the government of India. Subsequently, pursuing the matter to the consumer court wherein a number of consumer courts have entertained such cases on account of failure of PIO or appellate authority to provide information being deficiency in services. In addition, after serving a notice under section 80 CPC, one has still got an option to invoke article 226 of the Constitution and file a writ petition so that court directs the public authority to carry out its duty. Now the question is concerned RTI applicant is located in Sultanpur District(UP) whereas the office of PIO is in Calcutta. Supposingly, the concerned PIO is not moved even after serving of notice under section 80 CPC, then there may be a requirement to move to the consumer court. As it has been noticed by courts that a number of times the public authorities don't even reply to the notices also. Here lies the problem area. Normally, the case is to be filed in the jurisdiction of the court where the office of the opposite party lies which in this case would be Calcutta. So the whole aim of the exercise will be defeated. Is there any provision whereby the case can be lodged in Sultanpur District(UP) or Lucknow district consumer forum on some grounds. Even when the decision of number of district consumer forum in giving relief to RTI applicant is laudable, there is no relief for RTI applicant who is in transferable job or sitting at a distant location from office of public authority. Kindly suggest a way out. Also it has been learnt that it the RTI applicant or any antibody on his behalf can draft a notice under section 80 CPC, there is no formal requirement that the notice to be served by an advocate only. The same can be served by RTI applicant also. Request advice appropriately. Can on some grounds a writ petition can be filed after waiting and seeing the response of the public authority to the notice in Lucknow High Court instead of filing the writ petition in Calcutta High Court. Kindly Suggest some grounds. If a lawyer has to be engaged
in Calcutta district consumer Court/Calcutta High Court for filing consumer court case/writ petition, the whole aim of seeking information under RTI act will be defeated where in RTI applicant will have to incur exorbitant cost in engaging in a lawyer. Kindly suggest the problem resolution
Anonymous
20 April 2013 at 17:50
Do we need to give the landlord money for building a commode in the house. Our floor landlord is separate and ground floor is separate. But the landlords do nothing for maintenance, everyyear we spend for repairs from our pockets.
Nature79
20 April 2013 at 17:03
Hi ,
This is in regards to ongoing pursuance with BSNL/Department of Telecommunication whereby we have been sending RTI & appealing thereafter but have not got any proper response and now they have quashed the appeal stating the information asked in "Interogatory" in nature.
Below are details of RTI filed.
5th Jan 2013 - I filed RTI with PIO/Deputy Director Ministry of Communications & Technology CGO Complex Delhi asking for providing call details of my mother's BSNL mobile number (prepaid) from /between 25th Dec 2011 till 20th Jan 2012 (specially between 2nd Jan 2012 till 20th Jan 2012).
On the grounds that she was murdered by suspected people in night of 5/6 jan 2012 and call details there of would help us trace the culprits.
Since there's been no help from local police investigating the case nor from local courts which failed to direct police on this.
On this there were directions from Director
of concerned Ministry to provide information to me in letter dated back in Jan 14th 2013.But we got no response from addressed authority .WE send direct correspondence to addressed authority but still got no reply.Then we filed appeal on 7th March but we got reply from S.O (AS III) Dept of Telecom Sanchar Bhavan stating information sought is "Interrogatory".
While in another RTI send to local BSNL office in Hardoi (UP) on 5th Jan 2013 they replied the sought records have been erased/cant be retrieved now.We filed Appeal on this also and are still awaiting reply.
While on back end we have approach local courts again in Jan 2013 as well as got directions issued by DGP Law & order in Dec but no action result has come out despite directions from DGP office to Local Police & from Court to Local police.
Further to add I already send request to BSNL /Trai in local offices here in Lucknow/Hardoi to save such call details of mother's mobile back in Nov 2012 since they may be required/requested at later stage.
Please advice am i not entitled to such information and what are remedies in this through RTI.
Complaint/disciplinary action against employee of central administrative tribunal
An employee of a Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), working as a closed staff of a Member of a Bench of CAT misusing the name of CAT and its member to influencing the local police and administration in a personal matter against me. The member too, recomending and presurising the higher officers of police and administration for employee's interest.
In this situation what can I do? How and in which manner and whom I can register a complain against the employee for Departmental Action.