M Ramesh
01 December 2013 at 19:43
My client has only a xerox copy of a particular document, which he wants to rely on, in the Writ Petition. The Advocate needs to certify each annexure as `True Copy' while filing the Writ Petition.
Can the Advocate certify as `true copy' relying on the xerox copy.
What does the `true copy' exactly mean? Is it that the annexure is a true copy of the document, which the petitioner is in possession? or that it is the true copy of the original? Please clarify.
v kumar
01 December 2013 at 10:38
I was travelling in train no. 22912. One of the suitcase was stolen by thief after broking chain beneth my berth of sleeper coach in running train. At that time TTE said that you can lodge FIR at your destination station. Hence I lodged FIR in station after I was reached there.
I lost of Rs. 66000/-. Who will settle the claim.
Rajat sahotra
30 November 2013 at 21:10
The owner of vehicle lodged FIR qua theft of vehicle.
Thief caused accident with the stolen vehicle and killed someone.
In claim petition under MV Act thief was ex parte.
Insurance Co say that there was breach of policy as the thief was not having any valid DL as he has failed to come and produce any DL- Adverse inference to be drawn to this effect.
More so thief was not an agent of owner who is to be indemnified by insurance.
whether insurance is liable to indemnify for the accident caused by thief and pay compensation?
Bhuvan
30 November 2013 at 14:10
Hello Experts,
I have a case pending in District Court for which i have signed the vakalatnama and i got interim order. i want to take stay on the same in High court but as party in person, as my lawyer is asking fees much greater than what he is taking in District court (I am not saying that my lawyer is doing wrong. fees is out of my limits)
My question is:
Can the vakalatnama signed by me in district court cause problem for party as person in High court?
Member (Account Deleted)
29 November 2013 at 23:41
I AM A HOME LOAN CUSTOMER OF ICICI BANK.I HAVE BEEN MISGUIDED BY ICICI BANK SALES PERSON WHO MISGUIDED ME AT THE TIME OF SIGNING SANCTION LETTER WITH A TOP UP LOAN SANCTION LETTER.LATER ON WHEN I CAME TO KNOW ABOUT THIS TOP UP LOAN, I ASKED THE SALES PERSON ABOUT THE SAME HE SAID THAT IT WILL BE USED FOR INSURANCE POLICY. I TOLD THE SALES PERSON THAT I WAS UNAWARE ABOUT THE POLICY SO PLEASE CANCEL AS I DON'T WANT IT BUT HE KEPT ON FORCING ME THAT THIS IS COMPULSARY. HE ALSO EXPLAINED ME THAT THIS POLICY WILL HELP YOU IN CASE YOU FAIL TO PAY HOME LOAN DUE TO HEALTH PROBLEMS,LOSS IN BUSINESS AND IN CASE OF DEATH IT WILL PAY OFF YOUR OUTSTANDING DUES. I TOLD HIM THAT THIS TYPE OF CROSS SELLING IS NOT ALLOWED BY RBI AND ALSO TOLD HIM THAT IF THIS IS THE CONDITION I WILL NOT TAKE THE LOAN. AFTER THIS SALES PERSON TOLD SIR PLEASE DONT CANCEL THE LOAN I WILL CANCEL THE POLICY. ON 28/11/2013 I RECEIVED AN SMS FROM ICICI PRUDENTIAL STATING POLICY NO AND POLICY NAME, I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY POLICY KIT TILL NOW. WHEN I READ ABOUT THIS HOME PROTECT POLICY TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON ICICI PRU WEBSITE I CAME TO KNOW THAT THIS POLICY ONLY COVERS DEATH(NATURAL DEATH IS NOT COVERED) AND NOT ANY OTHER PROBLEM WHICH I WAS TOLD ABOUT THIS POLICY BY BANK. IN THIS CASE I AM MISGUIDED IN 2 WAYS. FIRSTLY THE POLICY IS FORCIBLY GIVEN TO ME AND SECONDLY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF POLICY COMMUNICATED TO ME WERE FALSE. WHEN I CONTATCTED MY BRANCH THEY ARE SAYING THAT IT WILL NOT BE CANCELLED AT ANY COST AS IT IS ATTACHED WITH LOAN. I ALSO APPROACHED ICICI BANK CUSTOMER CARE FOR MY PROBLEM FIRSTLY THEY SAID INSURANCE IS NOT MANDATORY BUT AFTER TALKING TO MY BRANCH THEY ARE SAYING ITS MANDATORY IN YOUR CASE. I ALSO APPROACHED ICICI PRUDENTIAL TO CANCEL INSURANCE POLICY THEY ARE SAYING THAT FOR CANCELLING THIS POLICY OR EXCERCISING FREE LOOK PERIOD YOU NEED NOC FROM YOUR BANK AND ICICI BANK IS NOT GIVING ME NOC FOR CANCELLING THIS POLICY. I AM VERY FRUSTRATED WITH THE BANKS BEHAVIOUR AND REQUEST YOU TO GUIDE ME HOW CAN I GET OUT OF THIS PROBLEM.
SURESH OJHA
29 November 2013 at 19:42
Respected Sir,
I want to submit article on Taxation but why filing up the requisite information
could not understand the meaning of "Source of Link" kindly enlighten, so that
Article can be forwarded.
Inconvenience cause to you is deeply regretted.
With regards
Suresh Ojha
Advocate
Dr.R.K.Chakravarty
28 November 2013 at 18:15
Can an Army war-widow, having got re-married in year 2000,apply in RESERVED CATEGORY of war-widow in DDA DRAW of Apartments 2010? She filed affidavit as war-widow/widow in present dates(after re-marriage & not as married lady)& got an Apt.
(1) Isnt this illegal,as affidavit should show her present married status of 2010 &
(2) Is'nt she depriving some other, STILL A WAR WIDOW's (not remarried)right.
(3) What & where action can be taken against this MISDDED of DDA & the Lady & in General Public Interest? Can a PIL be filed for future carefulness on the part of DDA & other similar Organisations,like NOIDA,GDA etc etc
ashutosh
28 November 2013 at 18:02
My father was living separate and also divorce case was running before his death. my mother was taking compensation from court for survival. before death loan taken by him from bank but after his death bank pressurised for recovery and also by local govt. office. before any decision by court he was passed away.
how can we responsible for loan during taken divorce case ??
please give suggestion...
P.ESAKKIMUTHU
28 November 2013 at 15:12
In the matter of Presumption of death, what is the exact date of death ? whether it is the date on which the person disappeared 7 years ago or the date on which the competent Court declared him to be dead after 7 yrs of disappearance .Please clarify with reference to any decision of court,if any
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Refusal of trash collection by society
the society has stopped collection of trash on the grounds that it contained diapers of a bedridden old women inspite of paying mainetainace charges
can it do so ?
if not what is the solution?
thank u