Anonymous
10 March 2010 at 18:00
Que.1.In Our Legal System the Ultimate Judgement in any Case whether it is Civil or Criminal is Jail, then why should anybody be afraid of Jail, Because Payroll system is also that supportive in India?
RAJENDRA
10 March 2010 at 16:52
claim application rejected on reason that
Driver doesent hold a valid driving licence at the time of accident
attach herewith
1. Driver licence
Please advice
Thanking you
Chintan Shah
10 March 2010 at 13:09
Dear collegues,
Mr. X's mother has some land and a flat to her name. There are also some loans and advances that she has given to her relatives. X's mother dies. X has a sister who is married. X's mother doesnot have a will. In this case who will inherit the property and in what share? What is the procedure to be followed for the same? Will the court appoint administrator or executor for the property of X's mother? Or can X himself become the executor?
The second question is a modification to the above:
If X is the only heir, is it necessary to get an order of the court to inherit the property or is it automatically inherited?
I am completely new to the field so please donot mind my doubts... And please do explain in detail..
Thanks in advance,
Chintan
sushil bhatt
10 March 2010 at 11:57
Dear All
Can a sole arbitrator ask the parties to file an affidavit in respect of admission/denial of documents. As per my knowledge, the parties can only file an affidavit before a court only and the arbitrator/arb. tribunal is not a court.
pls advise.
Anonymous
10 March 2010 at 09:42
SIR I AM HAVING TWO FIX DEPOSITS AMOUNTING RS 30,000/- AS TAX SAVER DEPOSIT IN PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK NOW I WANT TO BREAK THE DEPOSIT SO THAT I COULD GET PROPER TREATMENT OF MY DIABATIC FOOT WHAT SHOULD I DO.
vinod bansal
09 March 2010 at 23:02
R/Members
I filed a consumer complaint in distt consumer forum which was allowed & hon'ble forum ordered as "insurance company is liable to pay legaly payable amount to complaint after verifying bills etc.But company paid an amount of Rs. 32000/ which was assess as net loss by surveyor-whereas bills were submitted of Rs. 75000/-.company never verified bills and straight way paid a lesser amount as assessed by surveyor.i received this amount under protest & Now i want to challenge it,how i can challenge it,under section 27 of consumer act or i have to file a new complaint..kindly enlighten me,thanx
vinod bansal
09 March 2010 at 22:52
R/Members
PWD B& R is charging lease money from petrol pumps in Haryana on account of use of (BURM)kacchi land adjoining to highways,i want to know under which rule/act/notification/provision they are charging this amount.kindly enlighten me,thanx
sankar.n
09 March 2010 at 18:26
IS THERE ANY JUDGEMENT OR RULING IN FAVOUR OF THE LENDOR/FINANCIER/LEGAL OWNER TO GET BACK THE VEHICLE(LORRY) UNDER HYPOTHICATION FROM THE COURT WHILE THE RC OWNER IS OBJECTING TO IT AND ALSO CLAIMING TO GET THE VEHICLE(LORRY). THE CASE IS UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE POLICE. THE LORRY HAS BEEN SEIZED BY THE POLICE FROM THE CUSTODY OF THE FINANCIER WHICH WAS LEGALLY REPOSSESSED DUE TO DEFAULT IN THE PAYMENT OF DUES BY THE HIRER/RC OWNER. THE RC OWNER HAD GIVEN A COMPLAINT UNDER 420 IPC AGAINST THE RE-POSSESSION OF THE LORRY BY THE LENDOR/LEGAL OWNER/FINANCIER.
prakruthi
09 March 2010 at 16:54
Recently I came to know that prepaid simcard is banned in kashmir citing security reasons.
What is the difference betwoon prepaid and post paid in legal point of view?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Anand's Apology to Apex Court
HOPE ALL OUR LEARNED BRETHREN MUST TAKE A CUE FROM THIS NEWS ITEM:
BMW CASE
Fearing more action, Anand says sorry to SC
Once a prominent criminal law practitioner and now stripped of his senior advocate designation after being convicted of trying to influence a prosecution witness in the infamous BMW hit-and-run case on the basis of a television sting operation, lawyer R K Anand has given up the fight to restore his honour, and apologised to the Supreme Court.
The tendering of apology and appealing for mercy by Anand came in response to a notice from the apex court to him on July 29 last year asking why the lenient punishment — banning him from practising in the Delhi High Court and its suborddinate courts for four months and a fine of Rs 2,000 — be not enhanced to make it commensurate with the gravity of his misconduct.
The SC had on July 29 said Anand’s offence was “grave” for which the punishment should be stringent than the “lenient” sentence given by the HC and had asked him to show cause why the punishment be not enhanced.
“The action of Anand in trying to suborn the court witness in a criminal trial was reprehensible enough but his conduct before the HC aggravates the matter manifold. He does not show any remorse for his gross misdemeanour and instead tries to take on the HC by defying its authority,” the Supreme Court had said while terming the punishment given to him by HC as “wholly inadequate and incommensurate to the seriousness of his
actions and conduct”.
Faced with the uneasy prospect of getting a higher punishment, Anand in his response tendered “sincere and unqualified apology” for all the acts alleged against him virtually accepting the guilt. He also withdrew insinuations against one of the high court judges who took the decision against him.
Anand said the infamy already inflicted on him through the HC and SC verdicts was punishment enough. The HC had convicted him on August 21, 2008.
VIEWS :
That is the power of Justice, Equity and Good Conscience.