Parthasarathi Loganathan
01 April 2010 at 18:50
LAYMAN'S NEWS
As the historic Right to Education law comes into force today, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, in an unprecedented move, addressed the nation on the law. “The government pledges to give education to all children. It will make our children capable citizens,” the PM said.
“I call upon all state governments to join this national effort,” he added.
LAWMAN'S VIEWS
At the same time it should not allow politicians to mis(use) this law in the name of announcing Education related sops in their Election Manifestos
The issue is will it not pave way creation of more Educational Institutions mortgaged to private players in the name of this law?
Neeraj Kaushal
01 April 2010 at 17:18
if i have a citation , of AIR or another law books how can i find them on internet, free,
Smruti Shah
01 April 2010 at 15:43
Dear All,
Kindly send me a formate of Costing and forwading agreement.
Thanks in advance to all,
Smruti Shah
Anonymous
01 April 2010 at 14:43
can a company having proportional representation under its articles have voting in the 2nd AGM after the appointment of directors if the company receives a candidature for directorship before that AGM?
Varsha Pathak
01 April 2010 at 12:24
Hi All Learned Experts,
I want to put the query about legal remedies available where a person gave friendly loan to his friend they made borrowing agreement.After sometime he got check n presented in bank it was bounced and then his account was closed...How this fellow persue case against him also he did not gave any notice to him in this regard.
Remedy in N.I. act or in civil Law ?
Please advice me.
Thanks
Varsha Pathak
Shikha
31 March 2010 at 21:32
I'm going to graduate in a few months, and I'm confused with regards to the following:-
1) After i have enrolled as an Advocate can I represent my family at court, as their attorney?
2)My involvement with some of the business owned by my family would that debar me from being en-rolled as an advocate?
Thank You in advance
Praveen Kumar
31 March 2010 at 15:13
ICICI Bank debited my savings account with an amount of around Rs. 48,000/- (as I have a salary account with them) in February 2010. On asking for the reason they said that they were dues on a credit card in my name. I then submitted proof that I closed the said credit card more than 3 years back i.e., in August 2006 along with the letter, receipt and copy of the draft. Then the bank reversed the debit and gave me back my money. I asked the bank the following questions:
1. How come the bank does not know that it has already closed the card?
2. If they wanted to debit the money, how come they did not even inform me?
The bank has not given any reasons. In fact it is mandatory for a bank to inform at least the savings bank account holder (if it thinks that the credit card holder is no longer in the same address) that it is going to do so. It is therefore very arbitrary. Is it therefore very dangerous for a bank to have such sweeping powers (of debiting people's savings accounts) without even knowing how to use them and more so how come they are not accountable.
What cases can I file in the consumer, civil and criminal courts?
jiwan
30 March 2010 at 22:50
Dear All,
Under the statistics dept law , if we could not file annual return in prescribed time , we have to pay penalty u/s 8
as :- he shall for each such offence be punishable with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees and in the case of a continuing offence to a further fine which may extend to two hundred rupees for each day after the first during which the offence continues.
ques. he issue notice us for filing return (for 2007-08 ) upto 30.04.09 , but we could not file this return on this time,and now he asking for penalty .
1- which amt.of penalty we have to pay ?
2- what is mean of first offence ,dept has issue only one notice
Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi
30 March 2010 at 21:57
Sir,
A party had given 2 cheques as security against goods sold by my client, all details were written by the party. written amount is same as to the bill amount.
now the question is that the party had given assurance that he will paid all amount of arriers in bill as soon as possible and then return the cheque back.
more than 80 days passed from the last day of assurance.
my client had, after long time awaiting present both the cheques to bank, where it was returned with an endorsement that" stopped payment.
pl suggest which type of proceedings should we have to follows????????
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
LCI = 60K Plus Members
Why the emblem of LCI (appearing in the top middle of this page) still contains 50K. Can this be changed to 60K Plus Members